Estudio descriptivo de monitorización de un programa de calidad de sedación por no anestesiólogos

  1. Rafael Cabadas Avión 1
  2. Sonsoles Leal Ruiloba 1
  3. Santiago Vázquez 1
  4. M. Ojea Cendón 1
  5. Ismail Wi Hijazi 1
  6. Aurora Baluja 2
  7. Julián Álvarez Escudero 2
  1. 1 Hospital Povisa. Vigo, Pontevedra
  2. 2 Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago. Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña
Journal:
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas

ISSN: 2340-416 1130-0108

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 111

Issue: 1

Pages: 55-62

Type: Article

DOI: 10.17235/REED.2018.5763/2018 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas

Abstract

Introduction: sedation substantially improves the quality of digestive endoscopy procedures but may result in severe complications. Methods: a joint commission-based multidisciplinary protocol was used to define a protocol for sedation by non-anesthesiologists. ASA 4 patients were excluded, as well as patients with a difficult airway, complex procedures and deep sedation. Quality based on the analysis of 9 indicators were monitored. Incomplete procedures were also monitored in order to assess efficacy. Results: patient safety was established based on a very low incidence of complications and a rate of respiratory events of 1.07. Furthermore, a low rate of hypotension and bradycardia was found, as well as a low rate of pain, either during or after endoscopy and an incidence of unexpected admissions lower than 0.5%. The quality indicators measured reflect the evolution of the results of the program. Conclusions: ongoing sedation program monitoring in endoscopy allows the control of different quality dimensions and the implementation of steps for process improvement.