Multiple Goals and Homework Involvement in Elementary School Students

  1. Valle Arias, Antonio 2
  2. Pan López, Irene 2
  3. Núñez Pérez, José Carlos 3
  4. Rodríguez Martínez, Susana 2
  5. Rosário, Pedro 1
  6. Regueiro Fernández, Bibiana 2
  1. 1 Universidade do Minho
    info

    Universidade do Minho

    Braga, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/037wpkx04

  2. 2 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  3. 3 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
The Spanish Journal of Psychology

ISSN: 1138-7416

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 18

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1017/SJP.2015.88 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Resumo

This work arises from the need to investigate the role of motivational variables in homework involvement and academic achievement of elementary school students. The aims of this study are twofold: identifying the different combinations of student academic goals and analyzing the differences in homework involvement and academic achievement. The sample was composed of 535 fourth-, fifth- and sixth-grade elementary school students, between the ages of 9 and 13 years old. Findings showed three groups with different motivational profiles: a group of students with high multiple goals, another group with a learning goal orientation and a third group defined by a low multiple goals profile. Focusing on the differences between groups, it was observed that the amount of time doing homework was not associated with any motivational profile. Nevertheless, the differences were statistically significant between the motivational groups in the amount of homework (F(2, 530) = 42.59; p < .001; ?p2 = .138), in the management of time spent on homework (F(2, 530) = 33.08; p < .001; ?p2 = .111), and in academic achievement (F(2, 530) = 33.99; p < .001; ?p2 = .114). The effect size was large for the amount of homework performed and was also relatively large in the case of management of time and academic achievement.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ames C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Bembenutty H., & White M. C. (2013). Academic performance and satisfaction with homework completion among college students. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 83–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.10.013
  • Bempechat J. (2004). The motivational benefits of homework: A social-cognitive perspective. Theory Into Practice, 43, 189–196. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_4
  • Bong M. (2009). Age-related differences in achievement goal differentiation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 879–896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0015945
  • Brophy J., & Good T. (1986). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3ª Ed., pp. 328–375). New York, NY: Macmillan.
  • Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cooper H., Robinson J. C., & Patall E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001001
  • Cooper H., & Valentine J. C. (2001). Using research to answer practical questions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 143–153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_1
  • Corno L., & Xu J. (2004). Homework as the job of childhood. Theory Into Practice, 43, 227–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4303_9
  • Deci E. L., & Ryan R. M. (2002). Hanbook of self-determination research. Rochester, New York, NY: The University of Rochester Press.
  • Dettmers S., Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Kunter M., & Baumert J. (2010). Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 467–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018453
  • Eccles J. S., & Wigfield A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
  • Epstein J. L., & van-Voorhis F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181–193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3603_4
  • González-Pienda J. A., Fernández E., Bernardo A., Núñez J. C., & Rosário P. (2014). Assessment of a self-regulated learning intervention. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17. E-12, 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.12
  • Grund A. (2013). Motivational profiles in study-leisure conflicts: Quality and quantity of motivation matter. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 201–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.01.009
  • Hair J. E., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., & Black W. C. (1999). Multivariate data analysis. (6th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Harris R. J. (1985). A primer of multivariate statistics. Orlando, FL: Academic.
  • Hong E., Peng Y., & Rowell L. L. (2009). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 269–276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.009
  • Inglés C. J., Martínez-González A. E., & García-Fernández J. M. (2013). Conducta prosocial y estrategias de aprendizaje en una muestra de estudiantes españoles de Educación Secundaria Obligatoria [Prosocial behavior and learning strategies in a sample of Spanish Secondary Education students]. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 6, 33–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1989/ejep. v6i1.101
  • Keith T. Z. (1987). Children and homework. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Children’s needs: Psychological perspectives (pp. 275–282). Washington, DC: NASP Publications.
  • Midgley C., Kaplan A., & Middleton M. (2001). Performance-approach goals: Good for what, for whom, under what circumstances, and at what cost? Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 77–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.93.1.77
  • Núñez J. C., González-Pienda J. A., González-Pumariega S, García M., & Roces C. (1997). Cuestionario para la Evaluación de Metas Académicas [Evaluation of Academic Goals Questionnaire]. Oviedo, Spain: Departamento de Psicología. Universidad de Oviedo.
  • Núñez J. C., Suárez N., Cerezo R., González-Pienda J., Rosário P., Mourão R., & Valle A. (2015). Homework and academic achievement across Spanish Compulsory Education. Educational Psychology. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 35, 726–746. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.817537
  • Núñez J. C., Suárez N., Rosário P., Vallejo G., Cerezo R., & Valle A. (2015). Teachers’ feedback on homework, homework-related behaviors and academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research. 108, 204–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.878298
  • Paschal R. A., Weinstein T., & Walberg H. J. W. (1984). The effects of homework on learning: A qualitative synthesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 78, 97–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1984.10885581
  • Patall E. A., Cooper H., & Robinson J. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1039–1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325185
  • Paulick I., Watermann R., & Nucklës M. (2013). Achievement goals and school achievement: The transition to different school tracks in secondary school. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 75–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.10.003
  • Pérez M. V., Valenzuela M. F., Díaz A., González-Pienda J. A., & Núñez J. C. (2011). Disposición y enfoques de aprendizaje en estudiantes universitarios de primer año [Layout and learning approaches in university freshmen]. Universitas Psychologica, 10, 441–449.
  • Pintrich P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
  • Rosário P., Mourão R., Baldaque M., Nunes T., Núñez J. C., González-pienda J. A., Cerezo R., & Valle A. (2009). Tareas para casa, autorregulación del aprendizaje y rendimiento en matemáticas [Homework, self-regulated learning and performance in mathematics]. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 14, 179–192.
  • Rosário P. Mourão R., Trigo L., Suárez N., Fernández E., & Tuero E. (2011). Uso de diarios de tareas para casa en el inglés como lengua extranjera: Evaluación de pros y contras en el aprendizaje autorregulado y rendimiento [Using homework diaries in EFL: Evaluation of pros and cons in self-regulated learning and performance]. Psicothema, 23, 681–687.
  • Rosário P., Núñez J. A., Ferrando J. P., Paiva O., Lourenço A., Cerezo R., & Valle A. (2013). The relationship between approaches to teaching and approaches to studying: A two-level structural equation model for biology achievement in high school. Metacognition and Learning, 8, 47–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9095-6
  • Rosário P., Núñez J. C., Trigo L., Guimarães C., Fernández E., Cerezo R., … Figueiredo M. (2015).Transcultural analysis of the effectiveness of an intervention program to promote self-regulated learning in Mozambique, Chile, Portugal and Spain. Higher Education Research & Development. 34, 173–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.935932
  • Ryan R. M., & Deci E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.68
  • Schwinger M., Steinmayr R., & Spinath B. (2012). Not all roads lead to Rome Comparing different types of motivational regulation profiles. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 269–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.006
  • Shim S. S., Ryan A. M., & Anderson C. J. (2008). Achievement goals and achievement during early adolescence. Examining time-varying predictors and outcome variables in growth-curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 655–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.655
  • Trautwein U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009
  • Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Schnyder I., & Niggli A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438–456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.438
  • Trautwein U., Schnyder I., Niggli A., Neumann M., & Ludtke O. (2009). Chameleon effects in homework research: The homework-achievement association depends on the measures used and the level of analysis chosen. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.09.001
  • Valle A., Cabanach R. G., Núñez J. C., González-Pienda J., Rodríguez S., & Piñeiro I. (2003). Multiple goals, motivation and academic learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 71–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709903762869923
  • Valle A., Núñez J. C., Cabanach R. G., Rodríguez S., Rosário P., & Inglés C. J. (2015). Motivational profiles as a combination of academic goals in higher education. Educational Psychology. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. 35, 634–650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.819072
  • Valle A., Núñez J. C., Rodríguez S., Cabanach R. G., González-Pienda J. A., & Rosário P. (2010). Perfiles motivacionales y diferencias en variables afectivas, motivacionales y de logro [Motivational profiles and differences in affective, motivational and achievement variables]. Universitas Psychologica, 9, 109–121.
  • Valle A., Regueiro B., Rodríguez S., Piñeiro I., Freire C., Ferradás M., & Suárez N. (2015). Perfiles motivacionales como combinación de expectativas de autoeficacia y metas académicas en estudiantes universitarios [Motivational profiles as a combination of self-efficacy expectations and academic goals in university students]. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8, 1–8.
  • Xu J. (2005). Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 99, 46–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.1.46-55
  • Xu J. (2008). Models of secondary school students’ interest in homework: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1180–1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831208323276
  • Xu J. (2011). Homework completion at the secondary school level: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 104, 171–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671003636752
  • Xu J., & Wu H. (2013). Self-regulation of homework behavior: Homework management at the secondary school level. Journal of Educational Research, 106, 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2012.658457
  • Zimmerman B. J., & Kitsantas A. (2005). Homework practices and academic achievement: The mediating role of self-efficacy and perceived responsibility beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 397–417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.05.003
Fonte de datos: Dialnet