Predicting approach to homework in Primary school students

  1. Antonio Valle 1
  2. Irene Pan 1
  3. Bibiana Regueiro 1
  4. Natalia Suárez 2
  5. Ellián Tuero 2
  6. Ana Nunes 3
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

  3. 3 Universidade do Minho
    info

    Universidade do Minho

    Braga, Portugal

    ROR https://ror.org/037wpkx04

Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 27

Número: 4

Páxinas: 334-340

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Psicothema

Resumo

Antecedentes: el objetivo de esta investigación fue estudiar el peso de variables del alumno relacionadas con los deberes escolares (motivación intrínseca, percepción de utilidad, actitud, tiempo dedicado y gestión de ese tiempo) y del contexto (feedback del profesor y apoyo parental) en la predicción de los enfoques de trabajo en los deberes. Método: participaron 535 estudiantes de los tres últimos cursos de Primaria. Los datos fueron analizados en base a modelos de regresión jerárquica y path analysis. Resultados: los resultados sugieren que la mayor o menor implicación del alumno en la realización de sus deberes escolares está relacionado con el grado de motivación intrínseca y una actitud positiva hacia ellos. También se observa que los estudiantes que gestionan bien su tiempo dedicado a los deberes (y no necesariamente los que dedican más tiempo) son quienes más profundamente trabajan en ellos. Conclusiones: el apoyo parental y el feedback del profesor inciden sobre la implicación de los estudiantes a través de su efecto sobre los niveles de motivación intrínseca (directamente), y de la actitud, gestión del tiempo y percepción de utilidad (indirectamente). También sugieren una relación fuerte y significativa entre la implicación parental y de los profesores en los deberes escolares.

Información de financiamento

Financiadores

  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad Spain

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Barca, A., Peralbo, M., & Brenlla, J. C. (2004). Atribuciones causales y enfoques de aprendizaje: la escala SIACEPA [Causal attributions and learning aproaches in secondary education students: The Siacepa scale]. Psicothema, 16(1), 94-103.
  • Bempechat, J. (2004). The motivational benefits of homework: A socialcognitive perspective. Theory Into Practice, 43,189-196.
  • Biggs, J.B. (1993). What do inventories of students’ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
  • Byrne, B.M. (2009). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Cooper, H. (1989). Homework. New York: Longman.
  • Cooper, H., Jackson, K., Nye, B. A., & Lindsay, J. J. (2001). A model of homework’s influence on the performance evaluations of elementary school students. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 181-199.
  • Cunha, J., Rosário, P., Macedo, L., Mourão, R., Súarez, N., & Fuentes, S. (2015). Parents’ conceptions of their homework involvement in elementary school. Psicothema, 27(2), 159-165.
  • Dettmers, S., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2010). Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 467-482.
  • Dumont, H., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Neumann, M., Niggli, A., & Schnyder, I. (2012). Does parental homework involvement mediate the relationship between family background and educational outcomes? Contemporary Educational Psychology,3, 55-69.
  • Entwistle, N. J. (2009). Teaching for understanding at University: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Epstein, J. L., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2001). More than minutes: Teachers’ roles in designing homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 181-193.
  • Fernández-Alonso, R., Suárez-Álvarez, J., & Muñiz, J. (2015). Adolescents’ homework performance in mathematics and science: Personal factors and teaching practices. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1037/edu0000032.
  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Battiato, A. C., Walker, J M.T., Reed, R. P., De Jong, J. M., & Jones, K. P. (2001). Parental involvement in homework. Educational Psychologist, 36, 195-209.
  • Inglés, C. J., Martínez-González, A. E., & García-Fernández, J. M. (2013). Prosocial behavior and learning strategies in a sample of Spanish students of Compulsory Secondary Education. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 6, 33-53.
  • Karbach, J., Gottschling, J., Spengler, M., Hegewald, K., & Spinath, F. M. (2013). Parental involvement and general cognitive ability as predictors of domain-specific academic achievement in early adolescence. Learning and Instruction, 23, 43-51.
  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I-Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
  • Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., Rosário, P., & Valle, A. (2015). Homework and academic achievement across Spanish Compulsory Education. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 726-746.
  • Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2015). Teachers’ feedback on homework, homework-related behaviors and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 108, 204-216.
  • Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Rosário, P., Vallejo, G., Valle, A., & Epstein, J. L. (2015). Relationships between parental involvement in homework, student homework behaviors, and academic achievement: Differences among elementary, junior high, and high school students. Metacognition and Learning. doi: 10.1007/s11409-015-9135-5
  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parent involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1039-1101.
  • Regueiro, B., Suárez, N., Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., & Rosário, P. (2015). Homework motivation and engagement throughout compulsory education. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 20(1), 47-63.
  • Rosário, P., González-Pienda, J. A., Pinto, R., Ferreira, P., Lourenço, A., & Paiva, O. (2010). Efficacy of the program “Testas’s (mis)adventures” to promote the deep approach to learning. Psicothema, 22, 828-834.
  • Rosário, P., Núñez, J. A., Ferrando, J. P., Paiva, O., Lourenço, A., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2013). The relationship between approaches to teaching and approaches to studying: A two-level structural equation model for Biology achievement in high school. Metacognition and Learning, 8, 47-77.
  • Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8, 350-353.
  • Song, I. S., & Hattie, J. (1984). Home environment, self-concept, and academic achievement: A causal modeling approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1269-1281.
  • Suárez, N., Regueiro, B., Tuero, E, Cerezo, R., & Rodríguez, C. (2014). Family involvement in education as a tool for working towards academic success. Revista de Psicología y Educación, 9(2), 83-93.
  • Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372-388.
  • Trautwein, U., & Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement—still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 116-155.
  • Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., Schnyder, I., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Between-teacher differences in homework assignments and the development of students’ homework effort, homework emotions and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 176-189.
  • Valle, A., Regueiro, B., Rodríguez, S., Piñeiro, I., Freire, C., Ferradás, M., & Suárez, N. (2015). Motivational profiles as combination of self-efficacy expectations and academic goals in university students, European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8(1), 1-8.
  • Van Voorhis, F. L. (2011). Adding families to the homework equation: A longitudinal study of mathematics achievement. Education and Urban Society, 43, 313-338.
  • Xu, J., & Wu, H. (2013). Self-regulation of homework behavior: Homework management at the secondary school level. The Journal of Educational Research, 106, 1-13.
  • Xu, J., Yuan, R., Xu, B., & Xu, M. (2014). Modeling students’ time management in math homework. Learning and Individual Differences, 34, 33-42.