Deberes escolares y rendimiento académico en Educación Primaria

  1. Valle Arias, Antonio
  2. Pan López, Irene
  3. Núñez Pérez, José Carlos 1
  4. Rosário, Pedro
  5. Rodríguez Martínez, Susana
  6. Regueiro Fernández, Bibiana
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Revista:
Anales de psicología

ISSN: 0212-9728,  1695-2294

Ano de publicación: 2015

Volume: 31

Número: 2

Páxinas: 562-569

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.6018/ANALESPS.31.2.171131 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Anales de psicología

Resumo

En este artículo se analiza la relación entre la realización de de-beres escolares y el rendimiento académico en una muestra de estudiantes de los tres últimos cursos de Educación Primaria. Las variables vinculadas con la implicación de los alumnos en los deberes escolares fueron el número de deberes realizados, el tiempo dedicado a los deberes y el aprovechamiento del tiempo dedicado a los deberes; mientras que el rendimiento académico fue estimado en base a las notas en matemáticas y lengua extranjera (inglés). Se ha tenido en cuenta el posible efecto del curso y del género a la hora de calcular el nivel predictivo de las variables relativas a los deberes sobre el rendimiento aca-démico. Los resultados obtenidos indican que la cantidad de deberes reali-zados de los prescritos y el aprovechamiento del tiempo predicen positiva y significativamente el rendimiento académico en ambas asignaturas, mientras que la cantidad de tiempo dedicado a la realización de los deberes no es re-levante. Finalmente, mientras que el género no resultó significativo en la predicción del rendimiento académico, el curso sí predijo negativamente el rendimiento en matemáticas: a medida que se asciende de curso el rendi-miento en matemáticas tiende a disminuir

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Becker, H. J. y Epstein, J. L. (1982). Parent involvement: A survey of teacher practices. Elementary School Journal, 83, 85–102.
  • Bouffard, T., Boileau, L. y Vezeau, C. (2001). Students’ transition from ele-mentary to high school and changes of the relationship between moti-vation and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Educa-tion, 16, 589–604.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2ª ed.). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cooper, H. (1989). Synthesis of research on homework. Educational Leader-ship, 47(3), 85-91
  • Cooper, H. (2001). The battle over homework. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Cooper, H., Jackson, K., Nye, B. y Lindsay, J. J. (2001). A model of home-work's influence on the performance evaluations of elementary school students. Journal of Experimental Education, 69(2), 181–20.
  • Cooper, H. M., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B. y Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 9. 70–83.
  • Cooper, H., Robinson J. C. y Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987–2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1–62.
  • Cooper, H. y Valentine, J. (2001). Using research to answer practical ques-tions about homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 143-153.
  • Cosden, M., Morrison, G., Albanese, A. y Macias, S. (2001). When home-work is not homework: After-school programs for homework assis-tance. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 211-221.
  • Covington, M. V. (1998). The will to learn: A guide for motivating young people. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Jong, R., Westerhof, K. J. y Creemers, P. M. (2000). Homework and stu-dent math achievement in Junior High Schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(2), 130-157.
  • Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U. y Lüdtke, O. (2009). The relationship between homework time and achievement is not universal: Evidence from multi-level analyses in 40 countries. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 20, 375-405.
  • Deslandes, R. y Cloutier, R. (2002). Adolescents’ perception of parental in-volvement in schooling. School Psychology International, 23(2), 220–232.
  • Epstein, J.L. y Van Voorhis, F.L. (2001). More Than Minutes: Teachers' Roles in Designing Homework. Educational Psychologist, 36(3), 181-193.
  • Finney S. J. y DiStefano C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modelling. En G. R. Hancock, y R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modelling. A second course (pp. 269-314). Green-wich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  • Harris, S., Nixon, J. y Rudduck, J. (1993). School work, homework and gen-der. Gender and Education, 5(1), 3-14.
  • Hill, N. E. y Taylor, L. C. (2004). Parental school involvement and children's academic achievement: Pragmatics and issues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13, 161-164
  • Jackson, C. (2003). Motives for “laddishness” at school: Fear of failure and fear of the “feminine.” British Educational Research Journal, 29(4), 583–598.
  • Muhlenbruck, L., Cooper, H., Nye, B. y Lindsay, J. J. (2000). Homework and achievement: explaining the different strengths of relation at the ele-mentary and secondary school levels. Social Psychology of Education, 3, 295-317.
  • Núñez, J. C., Suárez, N., Cerezo, R., González-Pienda, J. A., Rosário, P., Mourão, R. y Valle, A. (2013). Homework and its relation to academic achievement across compulsory education. Educational Psychology. Doi: 1.1080/0144341.2013.817537.
  • Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Baldaque, M., Nunes, T., Núñez, J.C., González-Pienda, J.A., Cerezo, R. y Valle, A. (2009). Tareas para casa, autorregu-lación del aprendizaje y rendimiento en matemáticas. Revista de Psicodi-dáctica, 14(2), 179-192.
  • Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Núñez, González-Pienda, J. y Valle, A. (2006). SRL and EFL homework: gender and grade effects. Academic Exchange Quar-terly, 10(4), 135-14.
  • Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Núñez, J. C., y Solano, P. (2008). Homework and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) at issue: Findings and future trends. En A. Valle, J. C. Núñez, R. G. Cabanach, J.A. González-Pienda y S. Rodríguez (Eds.), Handbook of instructional resources and their applications in the classroom (pp. 123-134). Nueva York: Nova Science Publishers.
  • Rosário, P., Mourão, R., Trigo, L., Suárez, N., Fernández, E. y Tuero-Herrero, E. (2011). Uso de diarios de tareas para casa en el inglés como lengua extranjera:evaluación de pros y contras en el aprendizaje autorre-gulado y rendimiento. Psicothema, 23(4), 681-687.
  • Ryan, E. M. y Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilita-tion of motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psy-chologist, 55, 68–78.
  • Senechal, M. y LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Develop-ment, 73, 445–46.
  • Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. F. y Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and per-sistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1161–1176.
  • Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework–achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frecuency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372-388.
  • Trautwein, U. y Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievementFstill much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 115–145.
  • Trautwein, U., Köller, O., Schmitz, B. y Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis of 7th grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 26-5.
  • Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I. y Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438-456.
  • Trautwein, U., Schnyder, I., Niggli, A., Neumann, M. y Lüdtke, O. (2009). Chameleon effects in homework research: The homework–achievement association depends on the measures used and the level of analysis cho-sen. Contemporary Educational Psychology 34, 77–88
  • Wagner, P., Schober, B. y Spiel, C. (2007). Time students spend working at home for school. Learning and Instruction, 18(4), 309-32.
  • Walker, J.M.T., Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., Whetselm, D. R. y Green, C. L. (2004). Parental involvement in homework: A review of current research and its implications for teacher, afterschool program staff, and parent leaders. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project. Retrieved from http://www.gse.harvard.edu/hfrp/projects/fine/resources/homework.html
  • Younger, M. y.,Warrington, M. (1996). Differential achievement of girls and boys at GCSE: Some observations from the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17, 299-313.
  • Xu, J, (2006).Gender and homework management reported by high school students. Educational Psychology, 26, 73-91.
  • Xu, J. (2007). Middle school homework management: More than just gender and family involvement. Educational Psychology, 27, 173-189.
  • Xu, J. (2010). Gender and homework management reported by African American Students. Educational Psychology, 3. 755-77.
  • Xu, J y Wu, H. (2013). Self-regulation of homework behavior: homework management at the secondary school level. Journal of Educational Research, 106(1), 1-13.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. y Kitsantas, A. (2005). Students' perceived responsibility and completion of homework: The role of self-regulatory beliefs and processes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 3, 397-417.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet