Letter-writting manuals and the evolution of requests markers in the eighteenth century

Referencias bibliográficas

• Anon. (1756). The complete letter-writer: or, new and polite English secretary. Containing directions for writing letters on all occasions, ... To which is ... The second edition. London: S. Crowder and H Woodgate. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Anon. (1800). The complete young man’s companion; or, Self instructer: being an introduction to all the various branches of useful learning and knowledge. ... Manchester: Sowler and Russell. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Anon. (1773). The court letter writer; or the complete English secretary for town and country. London: S. Bladon. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. >http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Fisher, G. (1735). The instructor: or, young man’s best companion: ... To which is added, the family’s best companion, ... By George Fisher, ... London: A. Bettersworth et al. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Fordyce, D. (1790). The new and complete British letter-writer; or, young secretary’s instructor in polite modern letter-writing. ... By David Fordyce, M.A. London: C Cook. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Hallifax, C. (1755). Familiar letters on various subjects of business and amusement. Written in a natural, easy manner; and publish’d, principally, for the service of ... The third edition, revised and corrected. London: R. Baldwin. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Hicks, W. (1701). Wits academy: or, the muses delight. Being the newest academy of complements. Consisting of merry dialogues upon various occasions, ... With a perfect collection of all the newest and best songs and catches, ... The eighth edition, with additions. London: W. Richardson. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Tavernier, J. (1759). The entertaining correspondent; or, newest and most compleat polite letter writer. In three parts. ... To which is prefixed, a large introduction, ... Berwick: R. Taylor. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Gale Group. <http://galenet.galegroup.com/servlet/ECCO>
• Akimoto, M. (2000). “The grammaticalization of the verb ‘pray’.” In O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach & D. Stein. (Eds.). Pathways of change. Grammaticalization in English, (pp. 67-84). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Bannet, E. T. (2005). Empire of letters: Letter manuals and transatlantic correspondence, 1680-1820. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Norwood: N. J. Ablex.
• Brant, C. (2006). Eighteenth-century letters and British culture. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Brinton, L. (2006). “Pathways in the development of pragmatic markers in English.” In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (Eds.), The handbook of the history of English, (pp.307-334). London: Blackwell.
• Brinton, L. & Traugott, E. C. (2005). Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M. (1999). “Modifying pragmatic force hedges in Early Modern English dialogues.” In A. H. Jucker, F. Lebsanft & G. Fritz (Eds.). Historical dialogue analysis. (pp. 293-312). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Dossena, M. (2010). “Be pleased to report expressly’: the development of a public style in late modern English business and official correspondence.” In R. Hickey (Ed.), Eighteenth-century English: Ideology and change, (pp. 293-308). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Faya Cerqueiro, F. (2007). “The courtesy markers pray and please in the late 18th century: evidence from the Corpus of Late Eighteenth-Century Prose.” In M. Losada Friend, P. Ron Vaz, S. Hernández Santano & J. Casanova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th International AEDEAN conference. Huelva: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Huelva.
• Faya Cerqueiro, F. (2008). “Who requests whom and how they do it: use of request markers in Late Modern English letters.” In M. J. Lorenzo Modia (Ed.), Proceedings of the 31st AEDEAN international conference (pp. 269-278). A Coruña: Servizo de Publicacións da Universidade da Coruña.
• Faya Cerqueiro, F. (2009). “‘Please in nineteenth-century English: origin and position of a courtesy marker”. In C. Prado-Alonso, L. Gómez-García, I. Pastor-Gómez & D. Tizón-Couto (Eds.), New trends and methodologies in applied English language research. Diachronic, diatopic and contrastive studies (pp. 25-35). Bern, etc.: Peter Lang.
• Fitzmaurice, S. M. (1998). “The commerce of language in the pursuit of politeness in eighteenth-century England.” English Studies,79 (4), 309-328.
• Fitzmaurice, S. M. (2000). “Like talking on paper? The pragmatics of courtship and the eighteenth-century familiar letter.” Language Sciences, 22, 359-383.
• Gold, D. L. (2006). “A little-noticed English construction: Subjectless imperative please to + infinitive.” Neophilologus, 90, 107-117.
• Görlach, M. (1999). Nineteenth-century England: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Görlach, M. (2001). Eighteenth century English. Heidelberg: Winter.
• Hopper, P. & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Hunt, M. R. (1996). The middling sort: Commerce, gender and the family in England, 1680-1780. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.
• Jucker, A. H. (1994). “The feasibility of historical pragmatics.” Journal of Pragmatics, 22 (5), 533-536.
• Jucker, A. H. (2000). “English historical pragmatics: Problems of data and methodology.” In G. di Martino & M. Lima (Eds.), English diachronic pragmatics, (pp. 17-55). Napoli: CUEN.
• Langford, P. (1984). “The eighteenth century (1688-1789).” In K. O. Morgan (Ed.), The Oxford illustrated history of Britain, (pp. 352-418). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Österreicher, W. (1997). “Types of orality in text.” In E. J. Bakker & A. Kahane (Eds.), Written voices, spoke signs, tradition, performance, and the epic text. (pp. 190-214). Harvard: Harvard University Press.
• Palander-Collin, M. (2010). “Correspondence.” In A. H. Jucker & I. Taavitsainen (Eds.), Historical pragmatics, (pp. 651-677). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Porter, R. (1982). English society in the eighteenth century. London: Penguin.
• Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2006). “Eighteenth-century prescriptivism and the norm of correctness.” In A. van Kemenade & B. Los (Eds.), The handbook of the history of English, (pp. 539-557). London: Blackwell.
• Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2009). An introduction to late modern English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. & Faya Cerqueiro, F. (2007). “Saying please in Late Modern English”. In J. Pérez-Guerra et al. (Eds.), ‘Of varying language and opposing creed’: New insights into Late Modern English, (pp. 421-444). Bern: Peter Lang.
• Traugott, E. C. (2000). “Promise and pray-parentheticals.” Eleventh International conference on English historical linguistics (ICEHL XI), Santiago de Compostela, September 2000. In Elizabeth C. Traugott. Papers Available On-line. <http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/ect-papersonline.html>. Stanford University
• Traugott, E. C. & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Van Bergen, L. & Denison, D. (2007). “A corpus of late eighteenth-century prose.” In J. C. Beal, K. P. Corrigan & H. L. Moisl (Eds.), Models and methods in the handling of unconventional digital corpora, vol. 2, (pp. 228-46). Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave.
• OED. Oxford English dictionary. OED Online, March 2000-. Simpson, J.A. (Ed.). March 2011. <www.oed.com>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.