The law of Gibrat applied in the manufacturing SMEs of Ecuador

  1. Luis Enrique Simbaña Taipe 2
  2. Gabriela Estefanía Vargas Negrete 2
  3. Alexandra Morales Navarrete 2
  4. María Jesús Rodríguez Gulías 3
  5. David Rodeiro Pazo 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Escuela Politécnica del Ejército
    info

    Escuela Politécnica del Ejército

    Sangolquí, Ecuador

    ROR https://ror.org/05j136930

  3. 3 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

Journal:
GCG: revista de globalización, competitividad y gobernabilidad

ISSN: 1988-7116

Year of publication: 2019

Volume: 13

Issue: 1

Pages: 34-49

Type: Article

DOI: 10.3232/GCG.2019.V13.N1.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

More publications in: GCG: revista de globalización, competitividad y gobernabilidad

Abstract

The present investigation analyses the relationship between the size of the companies and their growth in contrast to Gibrat's law, for which it analyses a sample of 2,915 Ecuadorian manufacturing companies in the period 2012-2016. We apply regression by quantiles for panel data in order to establish the effect of variables with business characteristics and financial performance on the company's growth measured through sales and the number of employees. The results show that smaller companies grow at higher rates than larger companies. This evidence allows us to reject Gibrat's law since there is a negative relationship between the size and growth of manufacturing companies.

Bibliographic References

  • Acosta, M., Correa, A., & González, A. (2001). Crecimiento en la pyme canaria: influencia del tamaño, la edad y el sector de actividad. Documento de trabajo, 01.
  • Aivazian, V., Ge, Y., & Qiu, J. (2005). The impact of leverage on firm investment: Canadian evidence. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 277-291.
  • Almsafir, M. K., Nassar, I. A., Al-Mahrouq, M. H., & Hayajneh, J. A. (2015). The Validity of Gibrat's Law: Evidence from the Service Sector in Jordan. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1602-1606.
  • Almus, M., & Nerlinger, E. (2000). Testing "Gibrat's Law" for young firms-empirical results for West Germany. Small Business Economics, 15(1), 1-12.
  • Amores, R. E., & Castillo, V. A. (2017). Las PYMES ecuatorianas: su impacto en el empleo como contribución del PIB PYMES al PIB total. Espacios, 38(53), 15.
  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1990). La econometría de datos de panel. Investigaciones económicas, 14(1), 3-45.
  • Aslan, A. (2008). Testing Gibrat's law: Empirical evidence from panel unit root tests of Turkish firms. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
  • Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Gibrat's Law: are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24(3), 301-324.
  • Becchetti, L., & Trovato, G. (2002). The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms. The role of the availability of external finance. Small Business Economics, 19(4), 291-306.
  • Bentzen, J., Madsen, E. S., & Smith, V. (2012). Do firms' growth rates depend on firm size? Small Business Economics, 39(4), 937-947.
  • Blázquez, F., Dorta, J., & Verona, M. (2006). Concepto, perspectivas y medida del crecimiento empresarial, 19(31), 165–195.
  • Brenner, T., & Schimke, A. (2015). Growth Development Paths of Firms A Study of Smaller Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(2), 539-557.
  • Calvo, J. L. (2004). Testing Gibrats Law Across Regions. Evidende from Spain. In 44th ERSA Conference, Porto, Portugal.
  • Canay, I. (2011). A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data. Econometrics Journal, 14, 368-386.
  • Carrizosa, M. (2010). Gibrat’s law and the learning process. Small Business Economics, 34(4), 355-373.
  • Carrizosa, M. (2007). Firm growth, persistence and multiplicity of equilibria: an analysis of Spanish manufacturing and service industries. (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Rovira i Virgili).
  • Chávez, M. (2013). La influencia del Liderazgo en el Clima Organizacional, análisis de la PYME ecuatoriana (Master's thesis, Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador).
  • Choi, B. P. (2010). The US property and liability insurance industry: firm growth, size, and age. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 13(2), 207-224.
  • Coad, A. (2008). Firm growth and scaling of growth rate variance in multiplant firms. Economics Bulletin, 12(9), 1-15.
  • Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37, 633-648.
  • Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2016). Innovation and firm growth: Does firm age play a role?. Research Policy, 45(2), 387-400.
  • Daunfeldt, S. O., & Elert, N. (2013). When is Gibrat's law a law?. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 133-147.
  • Daunfeldt, S. O., Elert, N., & Lang, Å. (2012). Does Gibrat's law hold for retailing? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(5), 464-469.
  • Daza, J. (2015). La ley de Gibrat en las economías emergentes: el caso de Brasil (Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Extremadura).
  • Delmar, F., McKelvie, A., & Wennberg, K. (2013). Untangling the relationships among growth, profitability and survival in new firms. Technovation, 33(8-9), 276-291.
  • Demirel, P., & Mazzucato, M. (2010). The evolution of firm growth dynamics in the US pharmaceutical industry. Regional Studies, 44(8), 1053-1066.
  • Dini, M., & Stumpo, G. (2004). Pequeñas y medaianas empresas y eficiencia colectiva. México: Siglo XXI.
  • Doms, M., Dunne, T., & Roberts, M. (1995). The role of technology use in the survival and growth of manufacturing plants. International journal of industrial organization, 13(4), 523-542.
  • Donati, C. (2016). Firm growth and liquidity constraints: evidence from the manufacturing and service sectors in Italy. Applied Economics, 48(20), 1881-1892.
  • Falk, M. (2008). Testing Gibrat's Law for European Multinational Enterprises. FIW Research Reports, No. 0.14, FIW Research Centre International Economics, Vienna.
  • Fariñas, J. C., & Moreno, L. (2000). Firms' growth, size and age: A nonparametric approach. Review of Industrial organization, 17(3), 249-265.
  • Fiala, R. (2017). Testing Convergence toward Gibrat's Law for Czech Manufacturing Firms. Ekonomicky Casopis, 65(8), 737-750.
  • Fotopoulos, G., & Giotopoulos, I. (2010). Gribrat's law and persistence of growth in Greek manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 35(2), 191-202.
  • Fujiwara, Y., Di Guilmi, C., Aoyama, H., Gallegati, M., & Souma, W. (2004). Do Pareto-Zipf and Gibrat laws hold true? An analysis with European Firms. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 335(1-2), 197-216.
  • Ganugi, P., Grossi, L., & Crosato, L. (2004). Firm size distributions and stochastic growth models: a comparison between ICT and Mechanical Italian Companies. Statistical Methods and Applications, 12(3), 391-414.
  • Gibrat, R. (1931). Les inégalités économiques: applications: aux inégalitês des richesses, à la concentration des entreprises, aux populations des villes, aux statistiques des familles, etc: d'une loi nouvelle: la loi de l'effet proportionnel. Librairie du Recueil Sirey.
  • Gjini, K. (2014). Small and medium sized entreprises; growth factors. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 10(7).
  • Goddard, J., Wilson, J., & Blandon, P. (2002). Panel tests of Gibrat's law for Japanese manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(3), 415-433.
  • González, A., & Correa, A. (1998). Crecimiento y tamaño: un estudio empírico. Revista española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 27(95), 541-573.
  • González-Val, R., Lanaspa, L., & Sanz, F. (2014). New evidence on Gibrat's law for cities. Urban Studies, 51(1), 93-115.
  • Harris, R., & Trainor, M. (2005). Plant level analysis using the ARD: Another look at Gibrat's Law. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 52(3), 492-518.
  • Heshmati, A. (2001). On the growth of micro and small firms: evidence from Sweden. Small business economics, 17(3), 213228.
  • Hyytinen, A., & Toivanen, O. (2005). Do financial constraints hold back innovation and growth?: Evidence on the role of public policy. Research Policy.
  • INEC, (2014). Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Directorio de empresas y establecimientos.
  • INEC, (2017). Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos. Panorama laboral y empresarial del Ecuador.
  • Ishikawa, A., Fujimoto, S., Mizuno, T., & Watanabe, T. (2016). Firm growth function and extended-gibrat’s property. Advances in Mathematical Physics, 2016.
  • Jácome, H., & King, K. (2013). Estudios industriales de la micro, pequeña y mediana mepresa. (M. d. (MIPRO), Ed.) Quito: FLACSO, Sede Ecuador.
  • Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50, 649-670.
  • Leischnig, A., Henneberg, S. C., & Thornton, S. C. (2016). Net versus combinatory effects of firm and industry antecedents of sales growth. Journal of Business Research, 69(9), 3576-3583.
  • Lensink, R., Van Steen, P., & Sterken, E. (2005). Uncertainty and Growth of the Firm. Small Business Economics, 24(4), 381-391.
  • Levratto, N., Zouikri, M., & Tessier, L. (2010). The determinants of growth for SMEs. A longitudinal study of French manufacturing firms.
  • Megaravalli, A. V., & Sampagnaro, G. (2017). The validity of Gibrat Law: evidence from a panel of selected Indian firms. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 21(2), 1-17.
  • Miralles, M., Miralles, J., & Daza, J. (2017). Empresas tecnológicas y políticas públicas de desarrollo regional en Brasil. Revista problemas del desarrollo, 190(48), 61-82.
  • Miralles-Quiros, M. D. M., Miralles-Quiros, J. L., & Daza-Izquierdo, J. (2018). Growth, profits and foreign ownership in the Brazilian banking industry. Applied Economics, 1-12.
  • Mukhopadhyay, A., & Amirkhalkhali, S. (2010). Profitability performance and firm size-growth relationship. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 8(9), 121.
  • Nassar, I., Almasafir, M., & Al-Mahrouq, M. (2014). The validity of Gibrat's law in developed and developing countries (2008-2013): Comparison Based Assessment. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 266–273.
  • Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2003). Testing Gibrat's Law: Empirical Evidende from a Panel of Portuguese Manufacturing Firms. FEUC. Grupo de Estudos Monetários e Financeiros.
  • Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2006). Testing Gibrat’s Law: empirical evidence from a panel of Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 13(1), 65-81.
  • Pagano, P., & Schivardi, F. (2003). Firm size distribution and growth. The Scansinavian Journal of Economics, 105(2), 255274.
  • Piergiovanni, R. (2010). Gibrat's Law in the "Third Italy": Firm Growth in the Veneto Region. Growth and Change, 41(1), 25-58.
  • Ripollés, M., & Menguzzato, M. (2001). La importancia del empresario en el crecimiento de las PYMEs: Una aplicación al sector de la cerámica española. Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa, 7(1), 87-98.
  • Segarra, A., & Teruel, M. (2014). High-growth firms and innovation: an empirical analysis for Spanish firms. Small Business Economics, 43(4), 805-821.
  • Serrasqueiro, Z., Nunes, P. M., Leitão, J., & Armada, M. (2010). Are there non-linearities between SME growth and its determinants? A quantile approach. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(4), 1071-1108.
  • Simbaña, L., Rodríguez, M., & Rodeiro, D. (2017). Growth determinants in Ecuadorian companies. European Journal of Applied Business Management, 3(3), 120-135.
  • Velásquez, F. (2004). La estrategia, la estructura y las formas de asociación: fuentes de ventaja competitiva para las pymes colombianas. Estudios gerenciales, 20(93), 73-97.
  • Vicéns, J., & Sánchez, B. (2012). Regresión cuantílica: estimación y contrastes. Instituro L.R. Klein (21).
  • Zapata, E. (2004). Las pymes y su problemática empresarial. Análisis de casos. Investigacion en Administracion en America Latina, 296.