Validación del cuestionario de atribuciones para la detección de coincidencias en trabajos académicos

  1. Muñoz-Cantero, Jesús-Miguel 1
  2. Rebollo-Quintela, Nuria 1
  3. Mosteiro-García, Josefa 2
  4. Ocampo-Gómez, Camilo-Isaac 3
  1. 1 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  3. 3 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

Mostrar afiliacións +
Revista:
Relieve: Revista ELectrónica de Investigación y EValuación Educativa

ISSN: 1134-4032

Ano de publicación: 2019

Volume: 25

Número: 1

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.7203/RELIEVE.25.1.13599 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Relieve: Revista ELectrónica de Investigación y EValuación Educativa

Resumo

Plagiarism as a topic of research in the university context has not ceased to be a constant concern due to its multiple repercussions. This paper describes the process followed in the validation of the Questionnaire of attributions for the detection of coincidences in academic works (CUDECO), whose purpose is to evaluate the relevance that to cite correctly and to detect the causes that lead to commit plagiarism. From a sample of 2,331 students, an analysis of reliability as internal consistency and an exploratory factorial analysis (AFE) of the instrument is carried out. The analysis of reliability leads to propose a readjustment in the questionnaire initially designed. The factorial study suggests a structure configured by five factors: concept of plagiarism and its types (partial and total), causes that motivate the commission of it both internal (specific to the subject) and external (outside the subject) and the attitudes of the peer group towards plagiarism, findings in the line of research previous

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Akbulut, Y., Sendag, S., Birinci, G., Kiliçer, K., Sahin, M., & Odabasi, H.F. (2008). Exploring the types and reasons of Interet-triggered academic dishonesty among Turkish undergraduate students: Development of Internet-Triggered Academic Dishonesty Scale (ITADS). Computers & Education 51, 463–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.003
  • Amiri, F., & Razmjoo, S. A. (2016). On Iranian EFL Undergraduate Students’ Perceptions of Plagiarism. J Acad. Ethics, 14, 115-131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-015-9245-3
  • Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22 (2), 187-203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381034
  • Bennett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (2), 137-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293042000264244
  • Bilic-Zulle L., Frkovic V., Turk T., Azman J., & Petrovecki M. (2005). Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students. Croat Med J, 46 (1), 126-131. Retrieved from http://neuron.mefst.hr/docs/CMJ/issues/2005/46/1/15726686.pdf
  • Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009). Self-plagiarism or appropriate textual re-use? Journal of Academic Ethics, 7, 193–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-009-9092-1
  • Bryman. A. (2016). Social research methods (6ª ed.). Nueva York: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2016/v5i2a1
  • Cebrián-Robles, V., Raposo-Rivas, M., Cebrián-de-la-Serna, M., & Sarmiento-Campos, J.A. (2018). Percepción sobre el plagio académico de estudiantes universitarios españoles. Educación XX1, 21(2), 105-129. doi: https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.20062
  • Cheung, K.Y.F., Stupple, E.J.N., & Elander, J. (2017). Development and validation of Student Attitudes and Beliefs about Authorship Scale: a psychometrically robust measure of authorial identity. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 97-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1034673
  • Comas-Forgas, R., & Sureda-Negre,J. (2010). Academic plagiarism: explanatory factors from students’ perspective. Journal Academic Ethics, 8, 217-232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-010-9121-0
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  • De Winter. J., & Dodou. D. (2012). Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size. Journal of Applied Statistics,39(4), 695-710. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.61044
  • Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: a qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. High Education Research & Development, 26(2), 181-198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360701310805
  • Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students’ attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41 (2), 231-246. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927850
  • Ferreira,M.M., & Persike, A. (2018). As concepçoes brasilera e anglófona de plágio: um estudo preliminar. Signótica, Goiânia, 30 (2), 149-181. doi: https://doi.org/10.5216/sig.v30i2.46558
  • Finn, K,V., & Frone, M.R. (2004). Academic performance and cheating: moderating role of school identification and self-efficacy. The journal of educational research, 97 (3), 115-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.97.3.115-121
  • Gómez- Espinosa, M., Francisco, V., & Moreno-Ger, P. (2016). El impacto del diseño de actividades en el plagio de Internet en educación superior. Comunicar, 48, 39-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-04
  • Guerrero Sánchez, P., Mercado Yebra, J., & Ibarra, L.M. (2017). La deshonestidad, elemento que altera la integridad en las prácticas académicas en las Instituciones de Educación Superior. Estudios de caso comparados. Investigación y formación pedagógica Revista del CIEGC, 3(5), 6-25. Recuperado de http://revistas.upel.edu.ve/index.php/revinvformpedag/article/view/5183/2683
  • Gullifer, J., & Tyson, G. A. (2010). Exploring university students' perceptions of plagiarism: a focus group study. Studies in Higher Education, 35(4), 463-481. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903096508
  • Harris, R. A. (2001). The Plagiarism Handbook: Strategies for Preventing, Detecting, and Dealing with Plagiarism. Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak.
  • Hawley, C.S. (1984). The thives of academe: plagiarism in the university system. Improving college and university teaching, 32 (1), 35-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1984.10533838
  • Howard, S. J., Ehrich, J. F., & Walton, R. (2014). Measuring students' perceptions of plagiarism: Modification and Rasch validation of a plagiarism attitude scale. Journal of Applied Measurement, 15(4), 372-393. Recuperado de http://ro.uow.edu.au/sspapers/1461
  • Hu, G., & Sun, X. (2016). Conocimientos y actitudes ante el plagio del profesorado de lengua inglesa en universidades chinas. Comunicar,48, 29-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.3916/C48-2016-03
  • Jereb E., Perc M., Lämmlein B., Jerebic J., Urh M., Podbregar I., & Sprajc, P. (2018) Factors influencing plagiarism in higher education: A comparison of German and Slovene students. PLoS ONE, 13(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202252
  • Martin, D.E., Rao, A., & Sloan, L.R. (2011). Ethnicity, acculturation, and plagiarism: a criterion study of unethical academic conduct. Human organization, 70 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.70.1.nl775v2u633678k6
  • Martínez, M., & Esteban, F. (2005). Una propuesta de formación ciudadana para el EEES. Revista española de pedagogía, 230, 63-84. Retrieved from https://revistadepedagogia.org/wp-content/uploads/2007/06/230-04.pdf
  • Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovečki, M. (2010). Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croatian Medical Journal, 51 (3), 195-201. doi https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.195
  • Muñoz Cantero, J.M., Casar Domínguez, L.S., & Abalde Paz, E. (2007). El “contexto” y las “metas y objetivos” como elementos clave en la calidad de la atención a la diversidad en centros no universitarios. RELIEVE, 13(2), 235-261. doi: https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.13.2.4209
  • Ochoa S. L., & Cueva L. A. (2016). Percepciones de estudiantes acerca del plagio: datos cualitativos. Revista Encuentros, 14(02), 25-41. doi: https://doi.org/10.15665/re.v14i2.822
  • Park, C. (2003). In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by University Students Literature and Lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-88. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/0260293032000120352
  • Pittam, G., Elander, J., Lusher, J. Fox, P., & Payne, N. (2009). Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing. Studies in Higher Education 34(2), 153-170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070802528270
  • Poorolajal, J., Cheraghi,P., Irani,A.D., Cheragui, Z., & Mirfakhraei,M. (2012). Construction of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire for Assessing Plagiarism. Iranian J Publ Health, 41(11), 54-58. Retrieved from http://ijph.tums.ac.ir
  • Popoveniuc, B. (2018). Plagiarism and the crisis of Higher Education. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 10(3), 1-5. doi: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/57
  • Rebollo-Quintela, N., Espiñeira-Bellón, E.M., & Muñoz-Cantero, J.M. (2017). Atribuciones causales en el plagio académico por parte de los estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, Extr.(6), 192-196. doi: https://doi.org/10.17979/reipe.2017.0.06.2453
  • Sureda, J., Comas, R., & Morey, M. (2009). Las causas del plagio académico entre el alumnado universitario según el profesorado. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 50, 197-220. Recuperado de http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=80011741011
  • Sureda-Negre, J., Comas- Forgas, R., & Oliver-Trobat,M.F. (2015). Plagio académico entre alumnado de secundaria y bachillerato: Diferencias en cuanto al género y la procrastinación Comunicar, 44, 103-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-11
  • Zamora. S., Monroy. L., & Chávez. C. (2009). Análisis Factorial: una técnica para valorar la dimensionalidad de la pruebas. Cuaderno Técnico nº 6. México: Centro Nacional de Evaluación para la Educación Superior.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet