The main factors affecting somatic cell count in organic dairy farming

  1. Inmaculada Orjales 1
  2. Marta Lopez-Alonso 1
  3. Marta Miranda 1
  4. Ruth Rodríguez-Bermúdez 1
  5. Francisco Rey-Crespo 1
  6. Ana Villar 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, España
  2. 2 Centro de Investigación y Formación Agrarias (CIFA), Cantabria, España
Revista:
Spanish journal of agricultural research

ISSN: 1695-971X,  2171-9292

Ano de publicación: 2017

Volume: 15

Número: 4

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/2017154-11769 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Spanish journal of agricultural research

Resumo

Preventive management practices are essential for maintaining acceptable udder health status, especially in organic farming, in which the use of antimicrobials is restricted. The contribution of the following factors to somatic cell count (SCC) was assessed in 788 cows from 15 organically reared herds in northern Spain: milk production, lactation number, treatments applied, selective dry cow therapy and teat dipping routines. The data were examined by linear logistic regression. Lactation number was the main factor affecting logSCC (β= 0.339, p<0.001) followed in order of importance by milk production (β= -0.205, p<0.001), use of alternative treatments (β=0.153, p<0.001), selective dry cow therapy (β=0.120, p=0.005) and teat dipping routines (β=-0.076, p=0.028). However, the model only explained 17.0% of the total variation in SCC. This variable depends on factors other than those considered here, amongst which udder infection is probably one of the most important. Nonetheless, the study findings enabled us to determine the contribution of the main management factors that should be taken into account to improve udder health status on organic farms.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Spanish Government (AGL2010-21026); Centro Tecnológico Agroalimentario de Lugo, Spain (CETAL); IO is in receipt of a FPU fellowship (Ref. FPU14/01473) from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture and Sports.

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Busato A, Trachsel P, Schallibaum M, Blum JW, 2000. Udder health and risk factors for subclinical mastitis in organic dairy farms in Switzerland. Prev Vet Med 44: 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00104-5
  • Cicconi-Hogan KM, Gamroth M, Richert R, Ruegg PL, Stiglbauer KE, Schukken YH, 2013. Associations of risk factors with somatic cell count in bulk tank milk on organic and conventional dairy farms in the United States. J Dairy Sci 96: 3689-3702. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-6271
  • EC, 2007. Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 of 28 June 2007 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 2092/91. 28 of June 2007. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32007R0834
  • Erskine RJ, Eberhart RJ, 1991. Post-milking teat dip use in dairy herds with high or low somatic cell counts. J Am Vet Med Assoc 199: 1734-1736.
  • Green MJ, Bradley AJ, Newton H, Browne WJ, 2006. Seasonal variation of bulk milk somatic cell counts in UK dairy herds: Investigations of the summer rise. Prev Vet Med 74: 293-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.12.005
  • Hardeng F, Edge VL, 2001. Mastitis, ketosis, and milk fever in 31 organic and 93 conventional Norwegian dairy herds. J Dairy Sci 84: 2673-2679. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74721-2
  • Hogan JS, Smith KL, Hoblet KH, Schoenberger PS, Todhunter D, Hueston WD, Pritchard DE, Bowman GL, Heider LE, Brockett BL, Conrad HR, 1989. Field survey of clinical mastitis in low somatic cell count herds. J Dairy Sci 72: 1547-1556. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(89)79266-3
  • IFOAM, 2005. The IFOAM basic standards for organic production and processing. International Federation of Organic Agricultar Movementes, Germany.
  • NMC, 2006. Dry cow therapy. National Mastitis Council, USA. http://nmconline.org/drycow.htm
  • Orjales I, López-Alonso M, Rodríguez-Bermúdez R, Rey-Crespo F, Villar A, Miranda M, 2016. Is lack of antibiotic usage affecting udder health status of organic dairy cattle? J Dairy Res 83: 464-467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029916000601
  • Pankey JW, Eberhart RJ, Cuming AL, Daggett RD, Farnsworth RJ, McDuff CK, 1984. Uptake on postmilking teat antisepsis. J Dairy Sci 67: 1336-1353. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(84)81443-5
  • Reneau JK, 1986. Effective use of dairy herd improvement somatic cell counts in mastitis control. J Dairy Sci 69: 1708-1720. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80590-2
  • Roesch M, Doherr MG, Scharen W, Schallibaum M, Blum JW, 2007. Subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in Swiss organic and conventional production systems. J Dairy Res 74: 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002202990600210X
  • Ruegg PL, Reinemann DJ, 2002. Milk quality and mastitis test. Bovine Practitioner 36: 41-54.
  • Smith K, Hogan JS, 1993. Environmental mastitis. Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract 9: 489-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0720(15)30616-2
  • Villar A, López-Alonso M, 2015. Udder health in organic dairy cattle in Northern Spain. Span J Agric Res 13 (3): e0503. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2015133-6610
  • Villar A, Gradillas G, Fernández-Ruiz C, Rodríguez-Bermúdez R, Alonso ML, 2016. Dynamics of mammary infections in organic dairy farms in Northern Spain. Span J Agric Res 14 (2): e0502. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2016142-7626
Fonte de datos: Dialnet