Effect of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis serostatus on carcass weight and conformation and fat cover scores

  1. Ivan Mato 1
  2. Natividad Pesqueira 1
  3. Camino Factor 1
  4. Fernando Camino 2
  5. María L. Sanjuán 2
  6. Eduardo Yus 2
  7. Francisco J. Diéguez 2
  1. 1 ADSG Xundeva, Pontevedra, España
  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, España
Zeitschrift:
Spanish journal of agricultural research

ISSN: 1695-971X,  2171-9292

Datum der Publikation: 2017

Ausgabe: 15

Nummer: 1

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.5424/SJAR/2017151-10266 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Andere Publikationen in: Spanish journal of agricultural research

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

The paper was designed to assess the influence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (MAP) infection status of cows at culling (antibody positive vs negative) on carcass traits: weight and conformation and fat cover scores. A generalized least squares linear model was used to assess the influence of MAP on weight. Subsequently, a random effects logistic regression was completed in order to model the relation between MAP and conformation score (fair vs poor carcasses). A random effects ordered logistic model was used to estimate the influence on fat cover. The results indicated that seropositives had carcass weights 58.45 (34.65-83.35) kg lower than seronegatives. Regarding conformation score, the odds of having poor conformation instead of fair was 3.85 (1.35-11.85) times higher in seropositives. The odds of seropositives achieving a higher fat cover was approximately 5 (1.41-9.09) times lower than the odds for seronegatives. The estimated effects could be useful when assessing the economic benefits of a paratuberculosis control program.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Alonso-Hearn M, Molina E, Geijo M, Vazquez P, Sevila IA, Garrido JM, Juste RA, 2012. Immunization of adult dairy cattle with a new heat-killed vaccine is associated with longer productive life prior to cows being sent to slaughter with suspected paratuberculosis. J Dairy Sci 95: 618–629. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2860
  • Aly SS, Anderson RJ, Adaska JM, Jiang J, Gardner IA, 2010. Association between Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection and milk production in two California dairies. J Dairy Sci 93: 1030-1040. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2611
  • Beaudeau F, Belliard M, Joly A, Seegers M, 2007. Reduction in milk yield associated with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (Map) infection in dairy cows. Vet Res 38: 625-634. https://doi.org/10.1051/vetres:2007021
  • Benedictus G, Dijkhuizen AA, Stelwagen J, 1987. Economic losses due to paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Vet Rec 121: 142–146. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.121.7.142
  • Collins MT, Sockett DC, 1993. Accuracy and economic of the USDA-licensed enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for bovine paratuberculosis. J Am Vet Med Assoc 203: 1456-1463.
  • Chi J, Vanleeuwen JA, Weersink A, Keefe GP, 2002. Direct production losses and treatment costs from bovine viral diarrhoea virus, bovine leukosis virus, Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, and Neospora caninum. Prev Vet Med 55: 137-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(02)00094-6
  • Diéguez FJ, Arnaiz I, Sanjuán ML, Vilar MJ, Yus E, 2008. Management practices associated with Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection and the effects of the infection on dairy herds. Vet Rec 162: 614-617. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.162.19.614
  • EC, 2008. Regulation No 1249/2008 of 10 December 2008 laying down detailed rules on the implementation of the Community scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and the reporting of prices thereof. Offic J of the EU No. 377, 16/12/2008.
  • Elzo MA, Rae DO, Lanhart SE, Hembry FG, Wasdin JG, Driver JD, 2009. Association between cow reproduction and calf growth traits and ELISA scores for paratuberculosis in a multibreed herd of beef cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 16: 851-858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-008-9262-y
  • Groenendaal H, Galligan DT, 2003. Economic consequences of control programs for paratuberculosis in midsize dairy farms in the United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 223: 1757-1763. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.223.1757
  • Johnson-Ifearulundu Y, Kaneene JB, Lloyd JW, 1999. Herd-level economic analysis of the impact of paratuberculosis on dairy herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 214: 822-825.
  • Johnson-Ifearulundu YJ, Kaneene JB, Gardiner JC, Lloyd JW, Sprecher DJ, Coe PH, 2001. The effect of subclinical Mycobacterium paratuberculosis infection on milk production in Michigan dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 84: 2188-2194. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74665-6
  • Kudahl A, Nielsen SS, Sørensen JT, 2004. Relationship between antibodies against Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in milk and shape of lactation curves. Prev Vet Med 62: 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.11.008
  • Kudahl AB, Nielsen SS, 2009. Effect of paratuberculosis on slaughter weight and slaughter value of dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 92: 4340-4346. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2039
  • Lonja Binefar, 2015. Cotizaciones semanales. Lonja Agropecuaria de Binefar, Huesca, Spain. http://www.lonjabinefar.es/cotizaciones.
  • Manning EJB, Collins MT, 2001. Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: pathogen, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Sci Tech Rev 20: 133–155. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.20.1.1275
  • McKenna SL, Keefe GP, Barkema HW, McClure J, Vanleeuwen JA, Hanna P, Sockett, DC, 2004. Cow-level prevalence of paratuberculosis in culled dairy cows in Atlantic Canada and Maine. J Dairy Sci 87: 3770-3777. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73515-8
  • Nielsen SS, Toft N, 2008. Ante mortem diagnosis of paratuberculosis: A review of accuracies of ELISA, interferon-ɣ assay and faecal culture techniques. Vet Microbiol 129: 217-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.12.011
  • Raizman EA, Fetrow J, Wells SJ, Godden SM, Oakes MJ, Vazquez G, 2007. The association between Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis fecal shedding or clinical Johne's disease and lactation performance on two Minnesota, USA dairy farms. Prev Vet Med 78: 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.10.006
  • Sweeney RW, Whitlock RH, MacAdams S, Fyock T, 2006: Longitudinal study of ELISA seroreactivity to Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in infected cattle and culture-negative herd mates. J Vet Diagn Invest 18: 2–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/104063870601800102
  • Tiwari A, van Leeuwen JA, Doho IR, Stryhn H, Keefe GP, Haddad JP, 2005. Effects of seropositivity for bovine leukemia virus, bovine viral diarrhoea virus, Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis, and Neospora caninum on culling in dairy cattle in four Canadian provinces. Vet Microbiol 109: 147-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2005.05.011
  • Vázquez P, Garrido JM, Juste RA, 2012. Effects of paratuberculosis on Friesian cattle carcass weight and age at culling. Span J Agric Res 12: 662-670. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2012103-2728
  • Villarino MA, Jordan ER, 2005. Production impact of sub-clinical manifestations of bovine paratuberculosis in dairy cattle. Proc 8th Int Colloq on Paratuberculosis, Copenhagen (Denmark), Aug 14-17, p: 63.
  • Whist AC, Liland KH, Jonsson ME, Sæbø S, Sviland S, Østeras O, Norström M, Hopp P, 2014. Designing a risk-based surveillance program for Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis in Norwegian dairy herds using multivariate statistical process control analysis. J Dairy Sci 97: 6835-6849. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-6821
  • Whitlock RH, 1992. Diarrhea in cattle. In: Veterinary gastroenterology, 2nd ed. Anderson NV (ed), 783 pp. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet