Información engañosa sobre un producto y derecho antitrust

  1. Javier Framiñán Santas
Journal:
Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

ISSN: 1989-4570

Year of publication: 2018

Volume: 10

Issue: 2

Pages: 439-456

Type: Article

DOI: 10.20318/CDT.2018.4383 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Cuadernos de derecho transnacional

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

Dissemination of misleading information about a product can be considered a restriction of competition under certain conditions. This paper analyses what standard should be employed in the light of the EU Competition Law to evaluate such practice.

Bibliographic References

  • F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd et al contra Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato, C-179/16, Rec. 2018
  • C. Paz-Ares, “El ilícito concurrencial: de la dogmática monopolista a la política antitrust”, nº 159, Revista de Derecho mercantil, 1981
  • A. Robles Martín-Laborda, Libre competencia y competencia desleal, Madrid, La Ley, 2001
  • J.I.Font-Galán, y L. Mª. Miranda Serrano, Competencia desleal y antitrust, Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2005
  • J. Costas Comesaña, “Prohibición de falseamiento de la libre competencia por actos de competencia desleal”, en Mª P. Bello Martín-Crespo y F. Hernández Rodríguez (coords), Derecho de la libre competencia comunitario y español, Cizur Menor, Thomson/Aranzadi, 2009
  • M.E. Stucke, “How do (and should) competition authorities treat a dominant firm’s deception”, SMU law review, vol. 63, 2010
  • P. Areeda y D. F. Turner, Antitrust law, v. III, Boston-Toronto, Little Brown and Co., 1978, pp 280-281, P. E. Areeda, y H. Hovenkamp, Antitrust law, v. IIIB, Nueva York, Wolters Kluwer, 2015
  • H. Hovenkamp, Federal antitrust policy. The law of competition and its practice, St. Paul (MN) West, 2011
  • J. E. Stiglitz Y C.E. Walsh, Microeconomía, Madrid, Ariel, 2009
  • A.I. Gavil, W. E. Kovacic, y J. B. Baker, Antitrust law in perspective: cases, concepts and problems in competition policy, St. Paul (MN), West, 2008
  • P. Ibánez Colomo, “Appreciability and De minimis in Article 102 TFUE”, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 7, nº 10, 2016
  • R. Whish, “Intel v Commission:keep calm and carry on!”, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, v. 6, nº 1, 2015
  • P. Ibañez Colomo, “Case C-525/16, MEO-Serviços de Comunicaçoes e Multimédia: a major contribution to Article 102 TFUE case law”, disponible en https://chillingcompetition.com/2018/04/20/case-c-525-16-meo-servicos-de-comunicacoes-emultimedia-a-major-contribution-to-article-102-tfeu-case-law/ consultado por última vez el 17 de mayo de 2018