Nuevos medios y medios tradicionales en la red. Espacios de opinión e interacción política en la era Trump

  1. Rúas Araújo, Xosé 1
  2. Mazaira, Andrés 1
  3. Rodriguez Vazquez, Ana Isabel 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  2. 2 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Icono14

ISSN: 1697-8293

Ano de publicación: 2018

Título do exemplar: Comunicación, poder y cambio social

Volume: 16

Número: 1

Páxinas: 86-113

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.7195/RI14.V16I1.1118 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

Outras publicacións en: Icono14

Resumo

In the context of the political and media confrontation of the last presidential elections of the United States of America, this research compares the impact and scope of the traditional media's political opinion (The New York Times and The Washington Post) against two digital native media (The Huffington Post and Politico.com), through the analysis of a total of 162 publishers and opinion pieces published in their respective digital spaces and social networks. The result shows that the digital native media analyzed do not threaten the leadership of the traditional media on the net, although the impact and scope of the publishers of both are low and it is observed the absence of a strategy and criterion when it is positioned on the net, where they do not manage to gain space, and also it is proved a little interest of the online readers in the political opinion.

€ Ver financiamento

Información de financiamento

Los resultados de este artículo forman parte del proyecto “Usos y preferencias informativas en el nuevo mapa de medios en España: modelos de periodismo para dispositivos móviles” (Referencia: CSO2015-64662-C4-4-R), del Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad. Está cofinanciado por el fondo estructural FEDER, en el marco de la Red XESCOM (referencia: R2016/019 XESCOM).

Financiadores

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahmadian, S., Azarshahi, S. & Paulhus, D.L. (2017). Explaining Donald Trump via communication style: Grandiosity, Informality and Dynamism. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 49-53.
  • doi: 10.1016 / j.paid.2016.11.018
  • Allcott, H. & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236.
  • doi: 10.1257/jep.31.2.211
  • Amón, R. (2016). La audiencia es el poder. El País, 13 noviembre
  • http://goo.gl/AGQFmP
  • Anderson, C. W. (2013). Rebuilding the news: Metropolitan Journalism in the Digital Age. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Anstead, N. & O´Loughlin, B. (2015). Social Media Analysis and Public Opinion: The 2010 Uk General Election. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 204-220.
  • doi: 10.1111/jcc4.12102
  • Avendaño-Ruz, C. (2014). Hibridaciones asimétricas: comunicación digital y nuevos actores políticos. En: Millaleo, S. & Cárcamo, P.(eds.). Mediaciones del sistema político frente al activismo digital. Santiago de Chile: Fundación Democracia y Desarrollo.
  • http://goo.gl/Zo8o8H
  • Bakshy, E., Messing, S. & Adamic, L. (2015). Replication Data for: Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook. Harvard Dataverse, v. 2.
  • doi: 10.7910/DVN/LDJ7MS
  • Bassets, M. (2017). El nuevo presidente de EEUU declara la guerra a los medios de comunicación. El País, 22 enero.
  • http:// goo.gl/Fsq2vt
  • Bauman, Z. & Bordoni, C.(2014). State of Crisis. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bell, E.J., Owen, T., Brown, P.D., Hauka, C. & Rashidian, N. (2017). The Platform Press: How Silicon Valley Reengineered Journalism
  • http:// goo.gl/p4n5V8
  • Benkler, Y. (2015). La riqueza de las redes: cómo la producción social transforma los mercados y la libertad. Barcelona: Icaria.
  • Belli, S., Harré, R. & Íñiguez, L. (2010). Tecnoemociones y discurso: la performance emocional. REME: Revista Electrónica de Motivación y Emoción, 13(34).
  • http:// goo.gl/pSg4dL
  • Bentivegna, S. (2002). Politics and New Media. En: Lievrouw, L. A. & Livingstone, S. (eds.). The Handbook of New Media. Social Shaping and Consequences of ICTs. London: Sage, 50-61.
  • doi: 10.4135/9781446206904.n5
  • Briggs, A. & Burke, P. (2010). Social History of the Media: From Guttemberg to the Internet. London: Polity.
  • Campbell, K. (2017). “Did election results Trump frames of newspaper endorsements?”. En: Lilleker, D., Jackson, D.,Thorsen, E. & Veneti, A. (Eds.): US Election Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Early reflections from leading academics. Poole (England): The Centre for te Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.
  • Casero-Ripollés, A. (2012). Contenidos periodísticos y nuevos modelos de negocio: evaluación de servicios digitales. El Profesional de la Información, 21(4), 341-346.
  • doi: 10.3145/epi.2012.jul.02
  • Castells, M. (2012). Redes de indignación y esperanza: Los movimientos sociales en la era de Internet. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System, Politics and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199759477.001.0001
  • Dela Serna, V. (2016). Unos medios divididos. El Mundo, 10 noviembre.
  • http://goo.gl/jLxFN2
  • Deuze, M. (2017). Considering a possible future for Digital Journalism. Revista Mediterránea, 8(1), 9-18.
  • doi: 10.14198 / MEDCOM2017.8.1.1
  • Druckman, J.N., Kiefer, M. & Parkin, M. (2007). Going negative in a new media age: Congressional campaign websites, 2002-2006. Northwestern University-Institute for Policy Research.
  • http://goo.gl/4mXYKT
  • Fair, H. (2012). El discurso politico de la antipolítica. Razón y Palabra, 17(81),
  • http:// goo.gl/VAozYF
  • Feenstra, R.A. (2016). El potencial transformador de la democracia monitorizada a debate: contextualización teórica y diálogo con John Keane. Teknokultura, 13(2), 639-654. doi: 10.5209/rev_TEKN.2016.v13.n2.52437
  • García-Perdomo, V., Salaverría, R., Kilgo, D.K. & Harlow, S. (2017). To Share or no to Share. The influence of news values and topics on popular social media content in the United States, Brazil, and Argentina. Journalism Studies, 18, 1-22.
  • doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1265896
  • Gottfried, J., Barthel, M., Shearer, E. & Mitchell, A. (2016). The 2016 Presidential Campaign –a News Event That´s Hard to Miss. Pew Research Center.
  • http:// goo.gl/cSEzMN
  • Greenwood, S., Perrin, A. & Duggan, M. (2016). Social Media Update 2016. Pew Research Center.
  • http:// goo.gl/ihSriH
  • Happer, C. & Philo, G. (2013). The Role of the Media in the Construction of Public Belief and Social Change. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 321-336.
  • doi: 10.5964/jspp.v1i1.96
  • Holtz-Bacha, C. (2013). Web 2.0: nuevos desafíos en comunicación política. Diálogo Político, 30(1), 11-27.
  • http:// goo.gl/x4V91R
  • Keane, J. (2009). The life and Death of Democracy. London: Simon and Schuster.
  • Keegan, J. (2016). Blue Feed, Red Feed. See Liberal Facebook and Conservative Facebook, Side by Side. The Wall Street Journal, 18 mayo.
  • http:// goo.gl/3ngHfJ
  • Knight, B. & Chiang, Ch.-F. (2008). Media Bias and Influence: Evidence From Newspaper Endorsements. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge.
  • doi: 10.3386/w14445
  • Kohut, A.; Parker, K. (2008). Do Political Endorsements Matter? The Oprah Factor and Campaign 2008. Pew Research Center.
  • http:// goo.gl/nu22rR
  • Kovacic, M.P., Erjavec, K. & Stular, K. (2010). Credivility of Traditional vs. Online News Media: A Historical Change. Journalist´Perceptions?. Media Research: Croatian Journal for Journalism and The Media, 16(1), 113-130.
  • http:// goo.gl/UGbcJB
  • Lippmann, W. (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Macmillan.
  • Lukk, J.M. (2016). Candidates´ Use of Humor in Interviews Across Talk-Show Subgenres In The 2016 Presidential Election. University of Delaware: ProQuestLLC.
  • http:// goo.gl/pL69sX
  • Margolis, M. & Resnick, D.K. (2000). Politics as Usual: The Cyberspace Revolution. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Blackwell Polity Press.
  • Meraz, S. & Papacharissi, Z. (2013). Networked Gatekeeping and Networked Framing on #Egypt. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(2), 138-166.
  • doi: 10.1177/1940161212474472
  • Mitchell, A. & Holcomb, J. (2016). State of the News Media 2016. Pew Research Center. http:// goo.gl/kfHvcw
  • Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: Technology, solutionism, and the urge to fix problems that don’t exist. New York: Public Affairs.
  • Moy, P. & Bosch, B. (2013). Theories of public opinion. En: Cobley, P. & Schultz, P. (Eds.): Handbook of Communication Science: Theories and Models of Communication, vol.1. Berlín: De Gruyter Mouton.
  • Newman, N. (2017). Journalism, Media and Technology. Trends and Predictions 2017. Digital News Project 2017. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
  • http:// goo.gl/HaAvsD
  • Nielsen, R.K. (2012). Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton University Press.
  • doi: 10.1111 / 1478-9302.12028_122
  • Norris, P. (2010). Public Sentinel. News Media & Governance Reform. Washington D. C.: The World Bank.
  • doi: 10.1596/978-0-8213-8200-4
  • Nyhan, B. & Reifler, Jason (2015). Estimating fact-checking’s effects. Evidence from a long-term experiment during campaign 2014. Arlington, VA: American Press Institute.
  • http:// goo.gl/6xPonR
  • Nyhan, B. & Reifler, J. (2014). The effect of fact-checking on elites: A field experimenton U.S. state legislators. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 628-640.
  • doi: 10.1111/ajps.12162
  • Parkin, M. (2014). Talk show campaigns: Presidential candidates on daytime and late night television. Nueva York/Londres: Routledge.
  • Prior, M. (2007). Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rheingold, H. (2004). Multitudes inteligentes: la próxima revolución social. Madrid:
  • Gedisa.
  • Rosen, J. (2017). Journalism and the Illusion of Innocence. En Lilleker, D., Jackson, D., Thorsen, E. & Veneti, A. (Eds.): US Election Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. Early reflections from leading academics. Poole (England): The Centre for the Study of Journalism, Culture and Community.
  • Sampedro, V. (coord.)(2011). Cibercampaña. Cauces y diques para la participación. Las Elecciones Generales de 2008 y su proyección tecnopolítica. Madrid: Editorial Complutense.
  • Siegel, L. (2017). Trump´s disdain for the press has a silver lining. Media in the age of Trump. Columbia Journalism Review.
  • http:// goo.gl/QSSrno
  • Stewart, P. (2011). The influence of self-and other-deprecatory humor on presidential candidate evaluation during the 2008 US election. Social Science Information, 50 (2), 201-222.
  • doi: 10.1177/0539018410396616
  • Toret, J. (coord.)(2013). Tecnopolítica: la potencia de las multitudes conectadas. El sistema red 15M, un nuevo paradigma de la política distribuida. Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
  • doi: 10.7238 / in3wps.v0i0.1878
  • Uberti, D. (2017). Don´t let Trump get away With ´alternative facts´. Columbia Journalism
  • http:// goo.gl/nUaPoA
  • Wintersieck, A.L. (2017). Debating the Truth: The Impact of Fact-Checking During Electoral Debates. American Politics Research, 1-28.
  • doi: 10.1177/1532673X16686555
Fonte de datos: Dialnet