El riesgo de orientación en la inversión en spin-offs universitarias¿Existe? ¿Es posible identificarlo en los primeros años de vida?
- Julio Pombo Romero 1
- David Rodeiro Pazos 2
- María Jesús Rodríguez Gulías 1
-
1
Universidade da Coruña
info
-
2
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
info
ISSN: 1131-6837
Ano de publicación: 2016
Volume: 16
Número: 2
Páxinas: 29-48
Tipo: Artigo
Outras publicacións en: Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión
Resumo
A number of studies are showing that companies created from universities (USO) have a relatively low growth rate in relation to other start-ups. This may be due to the fact that a significant proportion of USOs can be set up in order to give continuity to research projects on the basis of public aid rather than to commercialize research results in the market. The main objective of this work is to discuss whether it is possible or not to differentiate two types of USO regarding their orientation to the market. We also check the possibility of identifying this difference in the earlier stages of the spin-offs because it would affect the company ́s risk level from the investors’ perspective. In order to study this, we identified a sample of 20 spin-offs and recorded their economic information during their first 5 years of life. We also tracked the number and amount of public grants and subsidies obtained during this period. The hypothesis of the article was tested using cluster analysis. The results obtained indicate the existence of two different types of USO regarding a market orientated business model or one that is not. This difference cannot be identified from the financial statements of the USO in its earliest stages. These facts can originate “orientation risk” defined as the impossibility for the investor in USOs to identify, in its earlier stages, if the company will end up oriented to the market or not.
Referencias bibliográficas
- Aguado R., Congregado E., Millán J. M., 2002. Entrepreneurship, financiación e innovación. La situación en la Unión Europea. Economía Industrial, 347, 125-134.
- Akerlof G., 1970. The Market for “Lemons”: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quaterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3), 488-500.
- Autio E., 1997. New technology-based firms in innovation networks symplectic and generative impacts. Research Policy, 26 (3-4), 263-281.
- Bank of England 2003. Finance for Small Firms. A Ninth Report. London: The Bank of England.
- Beraza J. M., Rodríguez A., 2010. Factores determinantes de la utilización de spinoffs como mecanismo de transferencia de conocimiento en las universidades. Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 16 (2), 115-135.
- Brown T. E., Uljin J. M., 2004. Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture: the integration between technology, progress and economic growth. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Callan B., 2001. Generating Spin-offs: Evidence From the OECD. Science Technology Industry Review, 26 (1), 13-56.
- Cardone C., Cassasola M. J., 2004. Comportamiento financiero de la PYME española: una visión desde la Teoría del Orden de Preferencias. Barcelona: XII de Foro de Finanzas.
- Cardozo R. E. R., 2004. University technology and business opportunities. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research. Glasgow: 24th Babson-Kauffman Entrepreneurship Research Conference.
- Chiesa V., Piccaluga A., 2000. Explotaition and difussion of public research: the case of academia spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Management, 30 (4), 329-339.
- Comisión Europea 2000. Progress Report on the Risk Capital Action Plan. Bruselas: Comisión Europea.
- Druilhe C., Garnsey E., 2004. Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter?. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (3-4), 269-285.
- Etzkowitz H., 2003. Triple Helix: A Manifesto for Innovation, Incubation and Growth, Estocolmo: SNS Press.
- Evans D. S., Leighton L. S., 1989. Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79 (3), 519-535.
- Fernández López S., Pérez-Astray B., Rodeiro D., Calvo N., 2014. Are firms interested in collaborating with universities? An open-innovation perspective in countries of the South West European Space. Service Business, 243, 1-26.
- Golob E., 2006. Generating spin-offs from University Based Research: The Potential of Technology Transfer. Tesis, (Dr), Columbia University.
- Harrison R., Leitch C., 2005. Growth dynamics in university spin-out companies: entrepreneurial ventures or technology lifestyle business. En: Clarysse B., Roure J. and Schamp T., eds. The role of private equity in growing new ventures, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Hayter C. S., 2010. The open innovation imperative: perspectives on success from faculty entrepreuners. Washington D.C.: George Washington University.
- Heirman A., Clarysse B., 2004. How and Why do Research-Based Start-ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (3-4), 269-285.
- Kantis H., Ishida M., Komori M., 2002. Empresarialidad en economías emergentes: Creación y desarrollo de nuevas empresas en América Latina y Este de Asia. Washington: Departamento de Desarrollo Sostenible, Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo.
- Lambert R., 2003. Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report. London: Her Majesty’s Treasury.
- Molero J. M., Maldonado G., 2012. Contraste entre spin-offs universitarios y empresas de base tecnológica independientes: el caso del Parque Científico de Madrid. Dirección y Organización, 46, 16-30.
- Mustar P., Wright M., Clarysse B., 2007. University spin-off firms: Lessons from ten years of experience in Europe. Science and Public Policy, 2 (35), 67-80.
- Ortín P. V. F., 2010. University Spin-offs vs. other NTBFs: Productivity Differences at the Outset and Evolution. Technovation, 34 (2), 101-112.
- Ortín P., Salas V., Trujillo M., Vendrell F., 2007. El spin-off universitario en España como modelo de creación de empresas intensivas en tecnología. Madrid: Ministerio de Industria, Turismo y Comercio.
- Postigo S., Tamborini F., 2002. Entrepreneuship Education in Argentina: The case of San Andrés University. En: Alon, I. and McInttyre, J.R., eds. Business Education and Emerging Market Economies. New York: Springer, 267-282
- Red OTRI de Universidades, 2011. Informe de la encuesta de Investigación y Transferencia de Conocimiento de las Universidades Españolas. Madrid: Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas.
- Rizzo U., 2015. Why do scientists create academic spin-offs? The influence of the context. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40 (2), 198-226.
- Rodeiro D., Fernández S., Otero L., Rodríguez A., 2010. Factores determinantes de la ceración de spin-offs universitarias. Revista Europea de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 1 (19), 47-68.
- Rodeiro D., Fernández S., Vivel M., Rodríguez M., 2013. The creation of new technologybased firms at Spanish public research institutions: an analysis of their financial statements. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 14 (3-4).
- Rodeiro D., Rodríguez Gulías M., Fernández López S., 2014. La actividad de innovación en las spin-off universitarias ¿Existe alguna diferencia con el resto de empresas?. Investigaciones de Economía de la Educación, 9, 241-253.
- Segarra-Blasco A., Arauzo-Carod J. M., 2008. Sources of Innovation and Industry-University interaction: Evidence from Spanish Firms. Research Policy, 37, 1283-1295.
- Shane S., 2004. Academic Entrepreneurship. University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Stankiewicz R., 1994. Spin-off companies from universities. Science and Public Policy, 21 (2), 99-107.
- Teixeira A. C., Grande M., 2013. Determinats of the Economic Performance of Portuguese Academic Spin-offs: Do Science, Technology Infraestructures and Support Matter?. Working Paper, FEP-UP, School of Economics and Management, University of Porto. Oporto: Universidad de Oporto.
- Veciana J. M., 2005. La creación de Empresas. Un enfoque gerencial. Barcelona: Colección Estudios Económicos, 33, Servicio de Estudios La Caixa.