Analyzing the determinants of the voting behavior using a genetic algorithm

  1. Marcos Vizcaíno-González 1
  2. Juan Pineiro-Chousa 2
  3. M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos 3
  1. 1 Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of A Coruna
  2. 2 Department of Financial Economics and Accounting, University of Santiago de Compostela
  3. 3 Department of Business Administration, University of Santiago de Compostela
Revista:
European Research on Management and Business Economics

ISSN: 2444-8834

Ano de publicación: 2016

Volume: 22

Número: 3

Páxinas: 162-166

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEE.2015.11.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: European Research on Management and Business Economics

Resumo

Using data about votes emitted by funds in meetings held by United States banks from 2003 to 2013, we apply a genetic algorithm to a set of financial variables in order to detect the determinants of the vote direction. Our findings indicate that there are three main explanatory factors: the market value of the firm, the shareholder activism measured as the total number of funds voting, and the temporal context, which reflects the influence of recent critical events affecting the banking industry, including bankruptcies, reputational failures, and mergers and acquisitions. As a result, considering that voting behavior has been empirically linked to reputational harms, these findings can be considered as a useful insight about the keys that should be taken into account in order to achieve an effective reputational risk management strategy.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahmed, Z., Zeeshan, S., Applying WEKA towards machine learning with genetic algorithm and back-propagation neural networks. Journal of Data Mining in Genomics & Proteomics, 5(2), 2014, 157.
  • Allen, F., Santomero, A.M., What do financial intermediaries do?. Journal of Banking & Finance 25:2 (2001), 271–294.
  • Allen, F., Santomero, A.M., The theory of financial intermediation. Journal of Banking & Finance 21:11 (1997), 1461–1485.
  • Bebchuk, L., Cohen, A., Firms’ decisions. Where to incorporate. Journal of Law and Economics 46:2 (2002), 383–425.
  • Becker, B., Bergstresser, D., Subramanian, G., Does shareholder proxy access improve firm value? Evidence from the business roundtable challenge. Journal of Law and Economics 56:1 (2013), 127–160.
  • Berger, A.N., Kashyap, A.K., Scalise, J.M., Gertler, M., Friedman, B.M., The transformation of the US banking industry: What a long, strange trip it's been. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (1995), 55–218.
  • Bernile, G., Jarrell, G.A., The impact of the options backdating scandal on shareholders. Journal of Accounting and Economics 47:1 (2009), 2–26.
  • Bhattacharya, S., Thakor, A.V., Contemporary banking theory. Journal of Financial Intermediation 3:1 (1993), 2–50.
  • Burns, N., Minnick, K., Does say on pay matter? Evidence from say on pay proposals in the United States. Financial Review 48:2 (2013), 233–258.
  • Cai, J., Garner, J.L., Walkling, R.A., Electing directors. The Journal of Finance 64:5 (2009), 2389–2421.
  • Calomiris, C.W., US bank deregulation in historical perspective. 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Chang, T., Yang, S., Chang, K., Portfolio optimization problems in different risk measures using genetic algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications 36:7 (2009), 10529–10537.
  • Chen, M., Using a hybrid evolution approach to forecast financial failures for Taiwan-listed companies. Quantitative Finance 14:6 (2014), 1047–1058.
  • Choi, S.J., Fisch, J.E., Kahan, M., Director elections and the role of proxy advisors. Southern California Law Review 82 (2008), 8–18.
  • Chung, K.H., Pruitt, S.W., A simple approximation of Tobin's q. Financial Management 23:3 (1994), 70–74.
  • Cuñat, V., Gine, M., Guadalupe, M., Say pays! Shareholder voice and firm performance. Journal of Finance, 2013, 373.
  • Davalos, S., Leng, F., Feroz, E.H., Cao, Z., Designing an if-then rules-based ensemble of heterogeneous bankruptcy classifiers: A genetic algorithm approach. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management 21:3 (2014), 129–153.
  • DeAngelo, H., DeAngelo, L., Proxy contests and the governance of publicly held corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 23:1 (1989), 29–59.
  • Dodd, P., Warner, J.B., On corporate governance: A study of proxy contests. Journal of Financial Economics 11:1 (1983), 401–438.
  • Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., Maber, D.A., Reputation penalties for poor monitoring of executive pay: Evidence from option backdating. Journal of Financial Economics 104:1 (2012), 118–144.
  • Ertimur, Y., Ferri, F., Oesch, D., Shareholder votes and proxy advisors: Evidence from say on pay. Journal of Accounting Research 51:5 (2013), 951–996.
  • Ferri, F., Maber, D.A., Say on pay votes and CEO compensation: Evidence from the UK. Review of Finance 17:2 (2013), 527–563.
  • Fiordelisi, F., Soana, M., Schwizer, P., The determinants of reputational risk in the banking sector. Journal of Banking & Finance 37:5 (2013), 1359–1371.
  • Fischer, P.E., Gramlich, J.D., Miller, B.P., White, H.D., Investor perceptions of board performance: Evidence from uncontested director elections. Journal of Accounting and Economics 48:2 (2009), 172–189.
  • Ghoshal, A.K., Mukherjee, T., Dhar, S., An empirical study in indian share market using neural network and genetic algorithm. Asian Journal of Research in Banking and Finance 1:1 (2011), 1–19.
  • Golberg, D.E., Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. 1989, Addison-Wesley, Reading.
  • Gompers, P.A., Ishii, J.L., Metrick, A., Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:1 (2003), 107–155.
  • Gregory-Smith, I., Main, B.G., Binding votes on executive remuneration. 2013, University of Sheffield Research Paper, United Kingdom.
  • Ha, S., Optimal insurance risk allocation with steepest ascent and genetic algorithms. The Journal of Risk Finance 14:2 (2013), 129–139.
  • Hoogs, B., Kiehl, T., Lacomb, C., Senturk, D., A genetic algorithm approach to detecting temporal patterns indicative of financial statement fraud. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management 15:1–2 (2007), 41–56.
  • Huang, J., Cai, Y., Xu, X., A hybrid genetic algorithm for feature selection wrapper based on mutual information. Pattern Recognition Letters 28:13 (2007), 1825–1844.
  • Jiao, Y., Stakeholder welfare and firm value. Journal of Banking & Finance 34:10 (2010), 2549–2561.
  • Kaplan, S.N., Zingales, L., Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112:1 (1997), 169–215.
  • Karimi, F., Dastgir, M., Shariati, M., Index prediction in Tehran stock exchange using hybrid model of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences 4:1 (2014), 352–357.
  • Larose, D.T., Discovering knowledge in data: An introduction to data mining. 2014, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  • Larose, D.T., Data mining methods and models. 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  • Leigh, W., Purvis, R., Ragusa, J.M., Forecasting the NYSE composite index with technical analysis, pattern recognizer, neural network, and genetic algorithm: a case study in romantic decision support. Decision Support Systems 32:4 (2002), 361–377.
  • Limentani, R.N., Tresoldi, N., Compliance function in banks and reputational risk. Bancaria 10 (1998), 88–93.
  • Lindenberg, E.B., Ross, S.A., Tobin's q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business 54:1 (1981), 1–32.
  • Lounsbury, M., Hirsch, P., Klinkerman, S., Institutional upheaval and performance variation: A theoretical agenda and illustration from the deregulation of banking in the field of finance. Advances in Strategic Management 15 (1998), 129–146.
  • Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M., Vive la resistance: Consolidation and community-level professional counter-mobilization in US banking. Academy of Management Journal 50:4 (2007), 799–820.
  • Mulherin, J.H., Poulsen, A.B., Proxy contests and corporate change: Implications for shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 47:3 (1998), 279–313.
  • Oh, K.J., Kim, T.Y., Min, S., Using genetic algorithm to support portfolio optimization for index fund management. Expert Systems with Applications 28:2 (2005), 371–379.
  • Rozsypal, A., Kubat, M., Selecting representative examples and attributes by a genetic algorithm. Intelligent Data Analysis 7:4 (2003), 291–304.
  • Sharma, B., Thulasiram, R.K., Thulasiraman, P., Computing value-at-risk using genetic algorithm. The Journal of Risk Finance 16:2 (2015), 170–189.
  • Shin, K., Lee, Y., A genetic algorithm application in bankruptcy prediction modeling. Expert Systems with Applications 23:3 (2002), 321–328.
  • Vafaie, H., De Jong, K., Genetic algorithms as a tool for feature selection in machine learning. 1992, 200–203.
  • Vasilakis, G.A., Theofilatos, K.A., Georgopoulos, E.F., Karathanasopoulos, A., Likothanassis, S.D., A genetic programming approach for EUR/USD exchange rate forecasting and trading. Computational Economics 42:4 (2013), 415–431.
  • Wu, C., Tzeng, G., Goo, Y., Fang, W., A real-valued genetic algorithm to optimize the parameters of support vector machine for predicting bankruptcy. Expert Systems with Applications 32:2 (2007), 397–408.
  • Xifra, J., Ordeix, E., Managing reputational risk in an economic downturn: the case of Banco Santander. Public Relations Review 35:4 (2009), 353–360.
  • Yahr, M.A., “Say-on-pay” proxies in the banking industry. Journal of Management & Marketing Research 13 (2013), 1–10.
  • Yang, J., Honavar, V., Feature subset selection using a genetic algorithm. Motoda, H., Liu, H., (eds.) Feature Extraction, construction, and subset selection: A data mining perspective, 1998, Springer, US, 117–136.