Percepción de autoeficacia, rendimiento académico y perfil vocacional en estudiantes de 4º de E.S.O.

  1. Carmen Torres
  2. José Eulogio Real Deus
  3. Sabela Mallo
  4. Raquel Méndez
Revista:
Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

ISSN: 2386-7418

Ano de publicación: 2015

Título do exemplar: XIII Congreso Internacional G-P de Psicopedagogía. Área 3: DESARROLLO VOCACIONAL Y CARRERA

Número: 3

Páxinas: 6-10

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.17979/REIPE.2015.0.03.139 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de estudios e investigación en psicología y educación

Resumo

La percepción de autoeficacia se ha manifestado como una importante variable mediadora del comportamiento humano y, más concretamente, del desempeño académico. En este trabajo se estudia la relación existente entre percepción de autoeficacia autorregulatoria, logro académico, e intereses ocasionales en estudiantes adolescentes. La muestra está formada por los estudiantes de 4º curso de E.S.O. de dos centros escolares de la Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia. Se han aplicado el Self Directed Search Forma R (4ª ed.) y el Self Efficacy for Learning Form, Se han tenido en cuenta, además, las calificaciones obtenidas. Los resultados corroboran la existencia de una clara relación entre las variables consideradas.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanisms. En R. Schwarzer (Ed.). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere
  • Bandura, A. y Jourden, F.J. (1991) Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 941-951.
  • Bidjerano, T. (2005). Gender differences in selfregulated learning. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association, Kerhonkson, NY
  • Caprara, G. y cols. (2011). The contribution of personality traits and self-efficacy beliefs to academic achievement: A longitudinal study. British Journal of Educations Psychology, 81, 78-96
  • Ceci, S., Williams, W., y Barnett, S. (2009).Women's underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin,135, 218-261
  • Feehan, P. F., y Johnston, J. A. (1999). The self-directed search and career self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 7(2), 145-159.
  • Hargittai, E., y Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender.Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432-448.
  • Holland, J.L. (1973). Making vocational choices. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Holland, J.L. (1992). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3ª ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Holland, J.L. (1997). Making vocational choices: a theory of vocational personalities and work environments (3ª ed.). Odessa FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Kitsantas, A. y Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Impact of students' self-efficacy for learning beliefs on their self-regulated learning processes. Paper presented at the Annual convention of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago
  • Lee, T. (2002).Gender differences in self-regulated on-line learning strategies within Korea's University context. Educational Technology Research and Development,50,101-111
  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., y Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79-122.
  • Lent, R.W., Brown, S. D., y Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice. A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(1), 36-49.
  • Maroño, M., y Deus, J. (2014). Análisis del perfil vocacional de los estudiantes de Psicología a través del inventario SDS. AXIOMA, 2(11), 44-50.
  • Martínez-Vicente, J.M. y Valls, F. (2001). Validez transcultural del modelo hexagonal de personalidad propuesto en la teoría tipológica de elección vocacional de John Holland. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 54(4), 577-586.
  • Nauta, M. M. (2010). The development, evolution, and status of Holland's theory of vocational personalities: Reflections and future directions for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(1), 11-22.
  • Nye, C., Su, R., Rounds, J., Frasgow, F. (2012). Vocational Tnterests and Performance: A quantitative summary of over 60 years. Percepctions on Psychological Science, 7(4), 384-403
  • Pajares, F., Britner, S., y Valiante, G. (2000). Writing and science achievement goals of middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 406-422.
  • Pajares, F., y Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-beliefs and school success: Self-efficacy, self-concept, and school achievement. En R. J. Riding y S. G. Rayner (Eds.). International perspectives on individual differences: Self-perception (pp. 239-265). Westport CT: Ablex Publishing.
  • Pajares, F., y Valiante, G. (2001). Gender differences in writing motivation and achievement of middle school students: A function of gender orientation? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 366-381.
  • Saunders, J., Davis, L., Williams, T. y Williams, J. (2004). Gender differences in self-perceptions and academic outcomes: A study of African-American high school students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(1), 81-90.
  • Schnell, K. y cols (2015). The impact of adolescents' self-efficacy and self-regulated goal attainment processes on school performance- Do gender and test anxiety matter?. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 90-98
  • Schmidt, F.L. (2011). A theory of sex differences in technical aptitude and some supporting evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 560-72.
  • Su, R., Rounds, J., & Armstrong, P.T. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859-884
  • Watt, H.M.G., y Eccles, J.S. (2008). Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association
  • White, J. (1982). Rejection. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  • Wood, R. E. y Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory organizational management. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 361-384.
  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. En D. H. Schunk y B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.). Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, Tnc.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., y Campillo, M. (2003). Motivating self-regulated problem solvers. En J. E. Davidson y R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). The nature of problem solving (pp. 233-262). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., y Martínez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing students use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.
  • Zimmerman, B.J., y Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51-59.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., y Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer.
  • Zimmerman, B. J., y Schunk, D. H. (Eds.) (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2ª ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.