Antecedentes del compromiso afectivo de los empleados de pymes intensivas en conocimiento

  1. Guadalupe Vila Vázquez 1
  2. Carmen Castro Casal 1
  3. Dolores Álvarez Pérez 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Departamento de Organización de Empresas e Comercialización
Revista:
European Research on Management and Business Economics

ISSN: 2444-8834

Año de publicación: 2016

Volumen: 22

Número: 1

Páginas: 25-30

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEE.2015.10.004 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: European Research on Management and Business Economics

Resumen

Este estudio analiza el vínculo entre las autoevaluaciones básicas (AEB), la importancia de la tarea y el compromiso afectivo (CA). El modelo fue contrastado en una muestra de empleados de pymes intensivas en conocimiento en España. Los resultados apoyan un modelo de mediación parcial en el que las AEB influyen en el CA de los empleados, tanto de manera directa como indirecta, al propiciar la percepción de importancia de la tarea.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aryee S., Walumbwa F.O., Mondejar R. y Chu, C.W. (2014). Core self-evaluations and employee voice behavior test of a dual-motivational pathway. Journal of Management, doi: 10.117/0149206314546192.
  • Bal, P. M., Kooij, D. T. A. M. y de Jong, S. B. (2013). How do developmental and accommodative HRM enhance employee engagement and commitment? The role of psychological contract and SOC strategies. Journal of Management Studies, 50(4), 545-572.
  • Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., Wang, Q., Kirkendall, C. y Alarcon, G. (2010). Ametaanalysis of the predictors and consequences of organization-based self-esteem. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 601-626.
  • Breugst, N., Domurath, A., Patzelt, H. y Klaukien, A. (2012). Perceptions of entrepreneurial passion and employees' commitment to entrepreneurial ventures. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 36(1), 171-192.
  • Camelo-Ordaz, C., García-Cruz, J., Sousa-Ginel, E. y Valle-Cabrera, R. (2011). The influence of human resource management on knowledge sharing and innovation in Spain: The mediating role of affective commitment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(7), 1440-1461.
  • Chang, C.-H. D., Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C. y Tan, J. A. (2012). Core selfevaluations. A review and evaluation of the literature. Journal of Management, 38(1), 81-128.
  • Chiang, Y.-H., Hsu, C.-C. y Hung, K.-P. (2014). Core self-evaluation and workplace creativity. Journal of Business Research, 67(7), 1405-1413.
  • Cleavenger, D. J. y Munyon, T. P. (2013). It's how you frame it: Transformational leadership and the meaning of work. Business Horizons, 56(3), 351-360.
  • De Clercq, D. y Belausteguigoitia Rius, I. B. (2007). Organizational commitment in Mexican small and medium-sized firms: The role of work status, organizational climate, and entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(4), 467-490.
  • Comisión Europea (2014). A partial and fragile recovery: Annual report on European SMEs.
  • Ferris, D. L., Johnson, R. E., Rosen, C. C., Djurdjevic, E., Chang, C. H. y Tan, J. A. (2013). When is success not satisfying? Integrating regulatory focus and approach/avoidance motivation theories to explain the relation between core self-evaluation and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 342-353.
  • Ferris, D. L., Rosen, C. R., Johnson, R. E., Brown, D. J., Risavy, S. D. y Heller, D. (2011). Approach or avoidance (or both?): Integrating core self-evaluations within an approach/avoidance framework. Personnel Psychology, 64(1), 137-161.
  • Gillet, N. y Vandenberghe, C. (2014). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: The mediating role of job characteristics. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 25(3), 321-347.
  • Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 393-417.
  • Grant, A. M. (2008). The significance of task significance: Job performance effects, relational mechanisms, and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 108-124.
  • Hackman, J. R. y Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work Redesign. Addison-Wesley.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. y Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs.
  • Hu, J., Wang, Z., Liden, R. C. y Sun, J. (2012). The influence of leader core selfevaluation on follower reports of transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 860-868.
  • Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D. y Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1332-1356.
  • Joo, B.-K. B., Yoon, H. J. y Jeung, C.-W. (2012). The effects of core self-evaluations and transformational leadership on organizational commitment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(6), 564-582.
  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E. y Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 237-249.
  • Judge, T. A., Erez, A., Bono, J. E. y Thoresen, C. J. (2003). The core self-evaluations scale: Development of a measure. Personnel Psychology, 56(2), 303-331.
  • Judge, T. A. y Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D. (2011). Implications of core self-evaluations for a changing organizational context. Human Resource Management Review, 21(4), 331-341.
  • Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., Durham, C. C. y Kluger, A. N. (1998). Dispositional effects on job and life satisfaction: The role of core evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(1), 17-34.
  • Kang, S.-C., Morris, S. S. y Snell, S. A. (2007). Relational archetypes, organizational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 236-256.
  • Kim, T.-Y., Liden, R. C., Kim, S.-P. y Lee, D.-R. (2015). The interplay between follower core self-evaluation and transformational leadership: Effects on employee outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 345-355.
  • Kittinger, J. D., Walker, A. G., Cope, J. G. y Wuensch, K. L. (2009). The relationship between core self-evaluations and affective commitment. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 11(1), 68-92.
  • Kurtessis J.N., Eisenberger R., Ford M.T., Buffardi L.C., Stewart K.A. y Adis C.S. (2015). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, doi: 10.1177/0149206315575554.
  • Lee, J. A. y Chulguen, Y. (2005). Factor structure of organizational commitment: Differences between U.S. and South Korean samples. Psychological Reports, 96(3), 595-602.
  • Lee, J. y Ok, C. M. (2015) Drivers of work engagement: An examination of core selfevaluations and psychological climate among hotel employees.. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 44, 84-98.
  • Marique, G., Stinglhamber, F., Desmette, D., Caesens, G. y de Zanet, F. (2013). The relationship between perceived organizational support and affective commitment: A social identity perspective. Group & Organization Management, 38(1), 68-100.
  • Melé, D. (2003). The challenge of humanistic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44(1), 77-88.
  • Messersmith, J. G. y Guthrie, J. P. (2010). High performance work systems in emergent organizations: Implications for firm performance. Human Resource Management, 49(2), 241-264.
  • Meyer, J. P. y Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
  • Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L. y Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20-52.
  • Morgeson, F. P. y Campion, M. A. (2003). Work design. En W. C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen, y R. J. Klimoski (Eds.), Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology (15) (pp. 423-452). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Morgeson, F. P. y Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321-1339.
  • Patel, P. C. y Conklin, B. (2012). Perceived labor productivity in small firms - The effects of high-performance work systems and group culture through employee retention. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 205-235.
  • Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y. y Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
  • Raja, U., Johns, G. y Ntalianis, F. (2004). The impact of personality on psychological contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 350-367.
  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. y Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment of the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825-836.
  • Rode, J. C., Judge, T. A. y Sun, J.-M. (2012). Incremental validity of core self-evaluations in the presence of other self-concept traits an investigation of applied psychology criteria in the United States and China. Journal of Leadership&Organizational Studies, 19(3), 326-340.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1995). Psychological Contracts in Organizations: Understanding Written and Unwritten Agreements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Saavedra, R. y Kwun, S. K. (2000). Affective states in job characteristics theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(2), 131-146.
  • Saridakis, G., Muñoz Torres, R. y Johnstone, S. (2013) Do human resource practices enhance organizational commitment in SMEs with low employee satisfaction?. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 445-458.
  • Scrima, F., Lorito, L., Parry, E. y Falgares, G. (2014). The mediating role of work engagement on the relationship between job involvement and affective commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(15), 2159-2173.
  • Sluss, D. M., Ashforth, B. E. y Gibson, K. R. (2012). The search for meaning in (new) work: Task significance and newcomer plasticity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 199-208.
  • Solinger, O. N., Van Olffen, W. y Roe, R. A. (2008). Beyond the three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 70-83.
  • Spector, P. E. (2006) Method variance in organizational research truth or urban legend?. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221-232.
  • Srivastava, A., Locke, E. A., Judge, T. A. y Adams, J. W. (2010). Core self-evaluations as causes of satisfaction: The mediating role of seeking task complexity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 255-265.
  • Stumpp, T., Hülsheger, U. R., Muck, P. M. y Maier, G. W. (2009). Expanding the link between core self-evaluations and affective job attitudes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 18(2), 148-166.
  • Vallacher, R. R., Wegner, D. M. y Frederick, J. (1987). The presentation of self through action identification. Social Cognition, 5(3), 301-322.
  • Wang, X., Ma, L. y Zhang, M. (2014). Transformational leadership and agency workers' organizational commitment: The mediating effect of organizational justice and job characteristics. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 42(1), 25-36.
  • Xerri, M. J. y Brunetto, Y. (2013). Fostering innovative behaviour: The importance of employee commitment and organisational citizenship behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(16), 3163-3177.
  • Zargar, M. S., Vandenberghe, C., Marchand, C. y Ayed, A. K. B. (2014). Job scope, affective commitment, and turnover: The moderating role of growth need strength. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 87(2), 280-302.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet