Las dificultades de exactitud y velocidad lectoras en escolares de segundo de Educación Primaria

  1. Outón Oviedo, Paula
  2. Suárez Yáñez, Andrés
Revista:
Revista de investigación en educación

ISSN: 1697-5200,  2172-3427

Ano de publicación: 2011

Volume: 9

Número: 2

Páxinas: 153-161

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Revista de investigación en educación

Resumo

Con la finalidad de averiguar si las dificultades de comprensión lectora detectadas en escolares al comienzo de 2º de Educación Primaria pudieran ser debidas a deficiencias en exactitud y/o automatización lectoras, se construyeron dos pruebas para medir la exactitud y automatización lectoras en castellano y gallego. Los resultados muestran la existencia de relaciones significativas entre estas variables y ofrecen pautas de velocidad y errores lectores. Los hallazgos están en sintonía con los de investigaciones previas y los amplían, al proporcionar evidencia adicional de la realidad gallega.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Calfee, R. C. y Piaotkowski, D. C. (1981). The Reading Diary: Acquisition of Decoding. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 346–373.
  • Clay, M. M. (1993). An observation survey: Of early literacy achievement. New Zealand: Heinemann.
  • Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J. y Oranje, A. (2005). FourthGrade Students Reading Aloud: NAEP 2002 Special Study of Oral Reading (NCES 2006469). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
  • Elley, W. B. (1992). How in the world students read? Hamburg: The International Association for the Evaluation of the Education Achievement.
  • Garzón, M. C., Jiménez, M. E. y Seda, I. (2008). El teatro de lectores para mejorar la fluidez lectora en niños de segundo grado. Lectura y vida, 29, 32-44.
  • Hasbrouck, J. y Tindal, G. A. (2006). Oral reading flueny norms: A valuable assessment tool for reading teachers. The Reading Teacher, 59, 636644.
  • Herman, P. A. (1985). The Effect of Repeated Readings on Reading Rate, Speech Pauses, and Word Recognition Accuracy. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 553–565.
  • Hudson, R., F., Lane, H. B. y Pullen, P. C. (2005). Reading fluency asssessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58 (8), 702-714.
  • LaBerge, D. y Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
  • Logan, G.D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13, 123–146.
  • Martínez Martín, J. A. y García Pérez, E. (2004). Diccionario de frecuencias del castellano escrito en niños de 6 a 12 años. Salamanca: Servicio de Publicaciones. Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca.
  • McKenna, M. C., Reinking, D. y Bradley, B. A. (2003). The effects of electronic trade books on the decoding growth of beginning readers. In R. M. Joshi, C. K. Leong y B. L. J. Kaczmarek (Eds.), Literacy acquisition: The role of phonology, morphology, and orthography, (pp. 193-202). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • McKenna, M. C. y Walpole, S. (2007). Assistive technology in the reading clinic: Its emerging potential. Reading Research Quarterly, 42, 140145.
  • Nicholson, T. (1993). Reading without contex. En G. B. Thompson, W. Tunmer y T. Nicholson (Eds.), Reading acquistion processes, (pp. 105-122). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
  • Pearman, C. J. (2008). Independent reading of CDROM storybooks: Measuring comprehension with oral retellings. The Reading Teacher, 61 (8), 594-602.
  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Perfetti C. A. (2007). Reading ability: lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383.
  • Rapp, W. H. (2005). Using assistive technology with students with exceptional learning needs: When does an aid become a crutch? Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 193-196.
  • Reutzel, D. R. y Hollingsworth, P. M. (1993). Effects of fluency training of second grader’s reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 325-331.
  • Rasinski, T. (2004). Assessing reading fluency. Honolulu, Hawái: PREL.
  • Rasinski, T. y Hamman, P. (2010). Fluency: Why it is “Not hot”. Reading Today, 28 (1), 26.
  • Riedel, B. W. (2007). The relation between DIBELS, reading comprehension, and vocabulary in urban first-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 42 (4), 546-567.
  • Samuels, S. J. (1979). The method of repeated readings. The Reading Teacher, 32, 403-408.
  • Shinn, M. R., y Good, R. H. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
  • Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S. y Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-406.
  • Stanovich, K. E. (2001). Individual Differences in the cognitive processes of reading: I. Word Decoding. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15, 485-493.
  • Tan, A. y Nicholson, T. (1997). Flashcards Revisited: Training Poor Readers To Read Words Faster Improves Their Comprehension of Text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 267-288.
  • Teijido, M. C., Pérez, M. L. y Fraga, I. (2003). Diccionario de frecuencias léxicas do galego escrito para nenos. LEXIGAL/Primaria. Santiago de Compostela: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela.  
Fonte de datos: Dialnet