Efectos de contexto en la formación de juicios en un caso de violación

  1. Novo Pérez, Mercedes
  2. Díaz Saco, Patricia
  3. González Amado, Bárbara
  4. Vilariño Vázquez, Manuel
Revista:
Anuario de psicología jurídica

ISSN: 1133-0740

Ano de publicación: 2015

Número: 25

Páxinas: 39-45

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.APJ.2015.02.002 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Anuario de psicología jurídica

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Abbey A., Buck P.O., Zawacki T., Saenz C. Alcohol's effects on perceptions of a potential date rape. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2003, 64:667-669.
  • Abbey A., Zawacki T., Buck P.O., Clinton A.M., McAuslan P. Sexual assault and alcohol consumption: What do we know about their relationship and what types of research are still needed?. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2004, 9:271-303. 10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00011-9.
  • Anderson I. What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology 2007, 46:225-245. 10.1348/014466606X101780.
  • Arce R., Fariña F. Peritación psicológica de la credibilidad del testimonio, la huella psíquica y la simulación: El sistema de evaluación global (SEG). Papeles del Psicólogo 2005, 26:59-77.
  • Arce R., Fariña F., Fraga A. Género y formación de juicios en un caso de violación. Psicothema 2000, 12:623-628.
  • Beichner D., Spohn C. Modeling the effects of victim behavior and moral character on prosecutors' charging decisions in sexual assault cases. Violence and Victims 2012, 27:3-24. 10.1891/0886-6708.27.1.3.
  • Bell, M.D. (2013). Perceptions of an acquaintance Rape: The ramifications of victim's weight, sexual history and clothing (tesis doctoral). California State University, Sacramento. Recuperado de . http://hdl.handle.net/10211.9/2155.
  • Bell S.T., Kuriloff P.J., Lottes I. Understanding attributions of blame in stranger rape and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students' social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1994, 24:1719-1734. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb01571.x.
  • Bohner G., Eyssel F., Pina A., Siebler F., Viki G.T. Rape myth acceptance: Cognitive, affective and behavioural effects of beliefs that blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator. Rape: challenging contemporary thinking 2009, 17-45. Cullompton, Devon, Reino Unido, Willan Publishing. M.A.H. Horvath, J. Brown (Eds.).
  • Brown J.M., Hamilton C., O'Neill D. Characteristics associated with rape attrition and the role played by skepticism or legal rationality by investigators and prosecutors. Psychology, Crime & Law 2007, 13:355-370. 10.1080/10683160601060507.
  • Campbell R. What really happened? A validation study of rape survivors' help-seeking experiences with the legal and medical systems. Violence and Victims 2005, 20:55-68. 10.1891/0886-6708.2005.20.1.55.
  • Campbell R., Raja S. The sexual assault and secondary victimization of female veterans: Help-seeking experiences with military and civilian social systems. Psychology of Women Quarterly 2005, 29:97-106. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00171.x.
  • Collins R.L. Content analysis of gender roles in media: Where are we now and where should we go?. Sex Roles 2011, 64:290-298. 10.1007/s11199-010-9929-5.
  • Ellison L., Munro V.E. Reacting to rape: Exploring mock jurors' assessments of complainant credibility. British Journal of Criminology 2009, 49:202-219. 10.1093/bjc/azn077.
  • Felson R.B., Pare P.P. Gender and the victim's experience with the criminal justice system. Social Science Research 2008, 37:202-219. 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2007.06.014.
  • Ferro C., Cermele J., Saltzman A. Current perceptions of marital rape: Some good and not-so-good news. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2008, 23:764-779. 10.1177/0886260507313947.
  • Forbes G.B., Adams-Curtis L.E., White K.B. First-and second-generation measures of sexism, rape myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women their interrelationships and association with college students' experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence against Women 2004, 10:236-261. 10.1177/1077801203256002.
  • Frese B., Moya M., Megias J.L. Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2004, 19:143-161. 10.1177/0886260503260245.
  • García-Moreno C., Guedes A., Knerr W. Understanding and addressing violence against women: Sexual violence 2012, Organización Mundial de la Salud, Ginebra.
  • George W.H., Stoner S.A., Norris J., López P.A., Lehman G.L. Alcohol expectancies and sexuality: A self-fulfilling prophecy analysis of dyadic perceptions and behavior. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 2000, 61:168-176.
  • Gerger H., Kley H., Bohner G., Siebler F. The acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior 2007, 33:422-440. 10.1002/ab.20195.
  • Goodman-Delahunty J., Graham K. The influence of victim intoxication and victim attire on police responses to sexual assault. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 2011, 8:22-40. 10.1002/jip.127.
  • Grubb A., Turner E. Attribution of blame in rape cases: A review of the impact of rape myth acceptance, gender role conformity and substance use on victim blaming. Aggression and Violent Behavior 2012, 17:443-452. 10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002.
  • Holleran D., Beichner D., Spohn C. Examining charging agreement between police and prosecutors in rape cases. Crime & Delinquency 2010, 56:385-413. 10.1177/0011128707308977.
  • Jordan J. Beyond belief? Police, rape and women's credibility. Criminology and Criminal Justice 2004, 4:29-59. 10.1177/1466802504042222.
  • Kaufmann G., Drevland G.C.B., Wessel E., Overskeid G., Magnussen S. The importance of being earnest: Displayed emotions and witness credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2003, 17:21-34. 10.1002/acp.842.
  • Kelly L. Routes to (in)justice: A research review on the reporting investigation and prosecution of rape cases 2002, HMCPS, Londres, Reino Unido.
  • Koski D.D. Jury decision making in rape trials: A review and empirical assessment. Criminal Law Bulletin 2002, 38:21-159.
  • Krahé B., Temkin J., Bieneck S., Berger A. Prospective lawyers' rape stereotypes and schematic decision making about rape cases. Psychology, Crime & Law 2008, 14:461-479. 10.1080/10683160801932380.
  • Lauritsen J., Owens J.G., Planty M., Rand M.R., Truman J.L. Methods for counting high-frequency repeat victimizations in the national crime victimization survey 2012, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
  • Lonsway K.A., Fitzgerald L.F. Rape myths in review. Psychology of Women Quarterly 1994, 18:133-164. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00448.x.
  • Lovett J., Horvath M.A.H. From alcohol and drugs in rape and sexual assault. Rape: Challenging Contemporary Thinking 2009, 125-160. Willan Publishing, Cullompton, Devon, Reino Unido. M.A.H. Horvath, J. Brown (Eds.).
  • Lovett J., Kelly L. Different systems similar outcomes? Tracking attrition in reported rape cases across Europe 2009, Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit, Londres, Reino Unido.
  • Maier S.L. The complexity of victim-questioning attitudes by rape victim advocates: Exploring some gray areas. Violence against Women 2012, 18:1413-1434. 10.1177/1077801212474432.
  • Martin P.Y. Rape work: Victims, gender, and emotions in organization and community context 2005, Routledge, New York, NY.
  • Maurer T.W., Robinson D.W. Effects of attire, alcohol, and gender on perceptions of date rape. Sex Roles 2008, 58:423-434. 10.1007/s11199-007-9343-9.
  • Megías J.L., Romero-Sánchez M., Durán M., Moya M., Bohner G. Spanish validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale (AMMSA). The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2011, 14:912-925. 10.5209/rev_SJOP. 2011.v14.n2.37.
  • Ministerio del Interior (2014). Anuario estadístico del Ministerio del Interior. 2013. Recuperado de: . http://www.interior.gob.es/documents/642317/1203602/Anuario_estadistico_2013_126140102_%2Bdatos_DGT.pdf/42c24d65-9147-4ff1-b8cb-46392e74e143.
  • Muller R.T., Caldwell R.A., Hunter J.E. Factors predicting the blaming of victims of physical child abuse or rape. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 1994, 26:259-279. 10.1037/0008-400X.26.2.259.
  • Novo M., Seijo D. Judicial judgement-making and legal criteria of testimonial credibility. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 2010, 2:91-115.
  • Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner violence 2013, Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), Organización Mundial de la Salud, Ginebra.
  • Patterson D. The linkage between secondary victimization by law enforcement and rape case outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2011, 26:328-347. 10.1177/0886260510362889.
  • Romero-Sánchez M., Megías J.L. Agresiones sexuales en población universitaria: El papel del alcohol y de los mitos sobre la violación. International Journal of Psychological Research 2009, 2:44-53.
  • Romero-Sánchez M., Megías J.L. Alcohol use as a strategy for obtaining nonconsensual sexual relations: Incidence in Spanish university students and relation to rape myths acceptance. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 2010, 13:864-874. 10.1017/S1138741600002511.
  • Romero-Sánchez M., Megías J.L., Krahe B. The role of alcohol and victim sexual interest in Spanish students' perceptions of sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 2012, 27:2230-2258. 10.1177/0886260511432149.
  • Sleed M., Durrheim K., Kriel A., Solomon V., Baxter V. The effectiveness of the vignette methodology: A comparison of written and video vignettes in eliciting responses about date rape. South African Journal of Psychology 2002, 32:21-28. 10.1177/008124630203200304.
  • Sporer S.L., Schwandt B. Moderators of nonverbal indicators of deception. A meta-analytic synthesis. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 2007, 13:421-446. 10.1037/1076-8971.13.1.1.
  • Strömwall L.A., Landström S., Alfredsson H. Perpetrator characteristics and blame attributions in a stranger rape situation. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 2014, 6:63-67. 10.1016/j.ejpal.2014.06.002.
  • Temkin J., Krahé B. Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude 2008, Hart Publishing, Portland, Oregon.
  • Tjaden P., Thoennes N. Extent, nature, and consequences of rape victimization: Findings from the national violence against women survey 2006, Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Washington, DC.
  • Trujano P., Raich M. Variables socioculturales en la atribución de culpa a las víctimas de violación. Psicothema 2000, 12:223-228.
  • Valor-Segura I., Expósito F., Moya M. Attitudes toward prostitution: Is it an ideological issue?. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 2011, 3:159-176.
  • Venema, R. M. (2013).Police officer decision making in reported sexual assault cases(tesis doctoral). Universidad de Illinois, Chicago. Recuperado de https://indigo.uic.edu/bitstream/handle/10027/10227/Venema_Rachel.pdf?sequence=1.
  • Vilariño M., Novo M., Seijo D. Estudio de la eficacia de las categorías de realidad del testimonio del Sistema de Evaluación Global (SEG) en casos de violencia de género. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud 2011, 2:1-26.
  • Vrij A. Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities 2008, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, Reino Unido. 2a ed.
  • Weiner B. Judgments of Responsibility: A Foundation for a Theory of Social Conduct 1995, Guilford, New York.
  • Wenger A.A., Bornstein B.H. The effects of victim's substance use and relationship closeness on mock jurors' judgments in an acquaintance rape case. Sex Roles 2006, 54:547-555. 10.1007/s11199-006-9014-2.
  • Whatley M.A. The effect of participant sex, victim dress, and traditional attitudes on causal judgments for marital rape victims. Journal of Family Violence 2005, 20:191-200. 10.1007/s10896-005-3655-8.
  • Wood J.L., James M., Ciardha C.O. I know how they must feel: Empathy and judging defendants. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context 2014, 6:37-43. 10.5093/ejpalc2014a5.
  • Yeater E.A., Treat T.A., Viken R.J., McFall R.M. Cognitive processes underlying women's risk judgments: Associations with sexual victimization history and rape myth acceptance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2010, 78:375-386. 10.1037/a001929.7.