Batterer intervention programmesa meta-analytic review of effectiveness

  1. Arias Martínez, Esther
  2. Arce Fernández, Ramón
  3. Vilariño Vázquez, Manuel
Journal:
Psychosocial Intervention

ISSN: 1132-0559

Year of publication: 2013

Issue Title: La intervención con hombres, condenados por violencia de pareja contra la mujer en España: investigación y avances en intervención

Volume: 22

Issue: 2

Pages: 153-160

Type: Article

DOI: 10.5093/IN2013A18 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR

More publications in: Psychosocial Intervention

Abstract

A meta-analysis of the state-of-the-art on the efficacy of batterer treatment programmes was conducted from the year 1975 to 2013. A total of 19 Spanish and English language research articles were retrieved yielding 49 effect sizes from a sample of 18,941 batterers. The results revealed that the recidivism rate as measured by couple reports (CR) was significantly higher than the rate based on official reports (OR), since the recidivism as measured by OR is underestimated. Overall, treatment showed a non significant positive weighted mean effect, d = 0.41. Nevertheless, the counternull effect size, EScounternull =0.82, suggested a null effect was as probable as a treatment efficacy rate of 38%. The intervention type was not a significant moderator of recidivism, but the counternull effect sizes, EScounternull = 0.82 and 0.94, revealed an efficacy rate of 38% and 42% based on ORs, for Duluth Model and behavioral-cognitive treatment, respectively. The long-term treatment interventions had a significantly positive medium effect size, d = 0.49. The implications of these findings for the design and assessment of future intervention programmes are discussed.

€ View funding

Funding information

This research has been sponsored by a grant of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation to the project “Reeducación de penados por violencia de género: Implementación y evaluación de programas de tratamiento” (Ref.: EDU2011-24561).

Funders

Bibliographic References

  • [References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis]
  • American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
  • Arce, R., & Farina, F. (2010). Disene implementacion del programa Galicia de reeducacion de maltratadores: Una respuesta psicosocial a una necesidad social y penitenciaria [Design and implementation of the Galician program for batterers re-education: A psychosocial answer to a social and penitentiary need]. Intervención Psicosocial, 19, 153-166.
  • Arce, R., Farina, F., Carballal, A., & Novo, M. (2009). Creacion y validacion de un protocolo de evaluacion forense de las secuelas psicologicas de la violencia de genero [Creation and validation of a forensic protocol to assess psychological harm in battered women]. Psicothema, 21, 241-247.
  • Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., & Robie, C. (2004). Does batterers treatment work? A metaanalytic review of domestic violence treatment. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1023-1053.
  • Babcock, J., C., & Steiner, R. (1999). The relationship between treatment, incarceration and recidivism of battering: A program evaluation of Seattles coordinated community response to domestic violence. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 46-59.
  • Beelmann, A., & Losel, F. (2006). Child social skills training in developmental crime prevention: Effects on antisocial behavior and social competence. Psicothema, 18, 603-610.
  • Bennett, L., Call, C., Flett, H., & Stoops, C. (2005). Program completion, behavioral change and re-arrest for the batterer intervention system of Cook County, Illinois. Chicago, IL: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority. Retrieved from http://tigger.uic.edu/∼lwbenn/DVPEP/cjia.pdf
  • Bennett, L., & Williams, O. (2001). Intervention program for men who batter. In C. Renzetti, & J. Edleson (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 261-277). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bowen, E., Gilchrist, E. A., & Beech, A. R. (2005). An examination of the impact of community-based rehabilitation on the offending behaviour of male domestic violence offenders and the characteristics associated with recidivism. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 189-209.
  • Chereji, S. V., Pintea, S., & David, D. (2012). The relationship of anger and cognitive distortions with violence in violent offenders population: A meta-analytic review. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 4, 59-77.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • Collie, R. M., Vess, J., & Murdoch, S. (2007). Violence-related cognition: Current research. In T. A. Gannon, T. Ward, A. R. Beech, & D. Fisher (Eds.), Aggressive offenders cognition: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 179-197). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
  • Cortina, J. M., & Dunlap, W. P. (1997). On the logic and purpose of significance testing. Psychological Methods, 2, 161-172.
  • Coulter, M., & VandeWeerd, C. (2009). Reducing domestic violence and other criminal recidivism: Effectiveness of a multilevel batterers intervention program. Violence and Victims, 24, 139-152.
  • Davis, R. C., & Taylor, B. G. (1999). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A synthesis of the literature. Women and Criminal Justice, 10, 69-93.
  • Davis, R. C., Taylor, B. G., & Maxwell, C. D. (1998). Does batterer treatment reduce violence? A randomized experiment in Brooklyn. Justice Quarterly, 18, 171-201.
  • Dobash, R., Dobash, R. E., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (1996). Reeducation programs for violent men: An evaluation. Research Findings, 46,309-322.
  • Dunford, F. W. (2000). The San Diego Navy experiment: An assessment of interventions for men who assault their wives. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 468-476.
  • Dutton, D. G., Bodnarchuk, M., Kropp, R., Hart, S. D., & Ogloff, J. P. (1997). Client personality disorders affecting wife assault post-treatment recidivism. Violence and Victims, 12, 37-50.
  • Eckhardt, C. I., Murphy, C. M., Whitaker, D. J., Sprunger, J., Dykstra, R., & Woodard, K. (2013). The effectiveness of intervention programs for perpetrators and victims of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 4, 196-231.
  • Farina, F., Arce, R., & Novo, M. (2008). Neighborhood and community factors: Effects on deviant behavior and social competence. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 78-84.
  • Feder, L. R., & Dugan, L. (2004). Testing a court-mandated treatment program for domestic violence offenders: The Broward experiment. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ nij/199729.pdf
  • Feder, L. R., & Wilson, D. B. (2005). A meta-analytic review of court-mandated batterer intervention programs: Can courts affect abusers behavior? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 239-262.
  • Frick, R. W. (1996). The appropriate use of null hypothesis testing. Psychological Methods, 1, 379-390.
  • Gondolf, E. W. (2000). Reassault at 30-months after batterer programs intake. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 44, 111-128.
  • Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Batterer intervention systems: Issues, outcomes, and recommendations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Gondolf, E. W. (2004). Evaluating batterer counseling programs: A difficult task showing some effects and implications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 605-631.
  • Gracia, E., Herrero, J., Lila, M., & Fuente, A. (2009). Perceived neighborhood social disorder and attitudes toward domestic violence against women among Latin- American immigrants. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 1, 25-43.
  • Hamberger, L. K., & Hastings, J. E. (1993). Court-mandated treatment of men who assault their partner: Issues, controversies, and outcomes. En N. Z. Hilton (Ed.), Legal responses to wife assault (pp. 96-121). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. San Diego, CA. Academic Press.
  • Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 1000-1019.
  • Hutchings, J. N., Gannon, T. A., & Gilchrist, E. (2010) A preliminary investigation of a new pictorial method of measuring aggression-supportive cognition among young aggressive males. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54, 236-249.
  • Isorna, M., Fernandez-Rios, L., & Souto, A. (2010). Treatment of drug addiction and psychopathology: A field study. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2, 3-18.
  • Jenkins, J. A., & Menton, C. (2003). The relationship between incarcerated batterers cognitive characteristics and the effectiveness of behavioral treatment. The Peer- Reviewed Journal of the American Correctional Association, 28, 1-27.
  • Jones, A. S., & Gondolf, E. W. (2002). Assessing the effect of batterer program completion on reassault: An instrumental variables analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18,71-97.
  • Kraemer, H. C., & Andrews, G. (1982). A non-parametric technique for meta-analysis effect size calculation. Psychological Bulletin, 91, 404-412.
  • Labriola, M., Rempel, M., & Davis, R. C. (2005). Testing the effectiveness of batterer programs and judicial monitoring. Results from a randomized trial at the Bronx Misdemeanor Domestic Violence Court. New York, NY: Center for Court Innovation. Retrieved from http://www.courtinnovation.org/ sites/default/files/battererprogramseffectiveness pdf
  • Levesque, D. A., & Gelles, R. J. (1998, July). Does treatment reduce recidivism in men who batter? A meta-analytic evaluation of treatment outcome. Paper presented at Program Evaluation and Family Violence Research: An International Conference, Durham, NH.
  • Lila, M., Garcia, A., & Lorenzo, M. (2010). Manual de intervención con maltratadores [Intervention with batterers. Manual]. Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
  • Lila, M., Gracia, E., & Murgui, S. (2013). Psychological adjustment and victim-blaming among intimate partner violence offenders: The role of social support and stressful life events. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 5, 147-153.
  • Lila, M., Oliver, A., Galiana, L., & Gracia, E. (2013). Predicting success indicators of an intervention programme for convicted intimate-partner violence offenders: The Contexto Programme. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 5, 73-95.
  • Lin, S., Su, C., Chou, F. H., Chen, S., Huang, J., Wu, G. T., Chen, C. (2009). Domestic violence recidivism in high-risk Taiwanese offenders after the completion of violence treatment programs. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 20, 458-472.
  • Martinson, R. (1974). What workSan Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 10, 22-54.
  • Maruna, S. (2004). Desistance and explanatory style: A new direction in the psychology of reform. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20, 184-200.
  • Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned in five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice: A Review on Research, 32, 221-320.
  • Maruna, S., & Mann, R. E. (2006). A fundamental attribution error? Rethinking cognitive distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177.
  • McGuire, J., Mason, T., & OKane, A. (2000). Effective interventions, service and policy implications. In J. McGuire, T. Mason, & A. OKane (Eds.), Behavior, crime and legal processes. A guide for forensic practitioners (pp. 289-314). Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Murphy, C. M., Musser, P. H., & Maton, K. I. (1998). Coordinated community intervention for domestic abusers: Intervention system involvement and criminal recidivism. Journal of Family Violence, 13, 263-284.
  • Novo, M., Farina, F., Seijo, D., & Arce, R. (2012). Assessment of a community rehabilitation programme in convicted male intimate-partner violence offenders. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 219-234.
  • OLeary, K. D., Barling, J., Arias, I., Rosenbaum, A., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1989). Prevalence and stability of physical aggression between spouses: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 263-268.
  • Perez, M. Gimenez-Salinas A., & Juan, M. (2012). Evaluación del programa "Violencia de Género: Programa de Intervención para Agresores", en medidas alternativas [Evaluation of the program "Violence against women: Program for the intervention with offenders", in alternative measures]. Madrid: Instituto de Ciencias Forenses y de la Seguridad (ICFS) y Secretar? General de Instituciones Penitenciarias. Retrieved from http://www.institucionpenitenciaria.es/web/export/sites/default/datos/ descargables/descargas/VDG-EVALUACION-AUTONOMA-NIPO.pdf
  • Redondo, S., Sanchez-Meca, J., & Garrido, V. (1999). Tratamiento de los delincuentes y reincidencia: Una evaluacion de la efectividad de los programas aplicados en Europa [Offender treatment and recidivism: An evaluation of the effectiveness of the programmes applied in Europe]. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 5,11-37.
  • Redondo, S., Sanchez-Meca, J., & Garrido, V. (2001). Treatment of offenders and recidivism: Assessment of the effectiveness of programmes applied in Europe. Psychology in Spain, 5, 47-62.
  • Redondo, S., SANchez-Meca, J., & Garrido, V. (2002). Los programas psicolicos con delincuentes y su efectividad: La situacion europea [Psychological programmes with offenders and their effectiveness: The European situation]. Psicothema, 14, 164-173.
  • Rosenfeld, B. D. (1992). Court ordered treatment of spouse abuse. Clinical Psychology Review, 12, 205-226.
  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169.
  • Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1994). The counternull value of an effect size: A new statistic. Psychological Science, 5, 329-334.
  • Saunders D. G. (1996). Feminist-cognitive-behavioral and process-psychodynamic treatments for men who batter: Interaction of abuser traits and treatment models. Violence and Victims 11, 393-414.
  • Smedslund, G., Dalsbo, T. K., Steiro, A., Winsvold, A., & Clench-Aas, J. (2011). Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner (Review). The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, Article No. CD006048. Retrieved from http://www.cochranelibrary.com
  • Stith, S. M., Rosen, K. H., & McCollum, E. E. (2004). Treating intimate partner violence within intact couple relationships: Outcomes of multi-couple versus individual couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 30, 305-318.
  • Taylor, B. G., & Maxwell, C. D. (2009). The effects of a short-term batterer treatment program for detained arrestees: A randomized experiment in the Sacramento County, California jail. Sacramento, CA: Department of Justice, Crime and Violence Prevention Center. Retreieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/ pdffiles1/nij/grants/228275.pdf
  • Tollefson, D. R., & Gross, E. (2006). Predicting recidivism following participation in a batterer treatment program. Journal of Social Service Research, 32, 39-62.
  • Tollefson, D. R., Webb, K., Shumway, D., Block, S. H., & Nakamura, Y. (2009). A mindbody approach to domestic violence perpetrator treatment: Program overview and preliminary outcomes. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment &Trauma, 18, 17-45.
  • Wormith, J. S., & Olver, M. E. (2002). Offender treatment attrition and its relationship with risk, responsivity and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 447-471.
Data source: Dialnet