O patrón desigual de crecemento europeounha análise semiparamétrica a nivel rexional

  1. Rodríguez González, Daniel
  2. Vence Deza, Xavier
Revista:
Revista galega de economía: Publicación Interdisciplinar da Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais

ISSN: 1132-2799

Año de publicación: 2013

Título del ejemplar: Economía da desigualdade

Volumen: 22

Número: 2

Páginas: 37-60

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.15304/RGE.22.EXTRA.1396 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Otras publicaciones en: Revista galega de economía: Publicación Interdisciplinar da Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais

Resumen

El objetivo de este trabajo es analizar la relación entre la desigualdad y la renta disponible equivalente a nivel regional y contrastar el tipo de relación existente entre ambas variables en la Unión Euro-pea (UE) en el contexto del modelo de crecimiento neoliberal. En este trabajo estimamos un modelo con datos de panel mediante el método de mínimos cuadrados ordinarios (MCO) de efectos fijos y, además, analizamos la posible existencia de autocorrelación espacial en el modelo y la necesidad de implementación de modelos espaciales. Una aportación novedosa es la estimación mediante análisis semiparamétrico, que permite no condicionar la función relacional. El análisis semiparamétrico, a diferencia de un análisis no paramétrico, nos permitirá introducir otras variables mediante una función lineal definida como, por ejemplo, la desigualdad inicial, la densidad de población, el empleo en distintos sectores (industry mix) o las transferencias. Esta aplicación del análisis semiparamétrico es una contribución relevante de este trabajo, ya que todavía es una técnica novedosa para el estudio de la desigualdad.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Ahluwalia, M.S.; Carter, N.G.; Chen, H.B. (1979): "Growth and Poverty in Developing Countries", Journal of Development Economics, 6, pp. 299-341.
  • Alesina, A.; Rodrik, D. (1994): "Distributive Politics and Economics Growth", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109 (2), pp. 465-490.
  • Alvaredo, F.; Sáez, E. (2006): Income and Wealth Concentration in Spain in a Historical and Fiscal Perspective. (CEPR Discussion Paper Series, 5836). London: The Centre for Economic Policy Research. <www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP5836.asp>.
  • Anand, S.; Kanbur, S.M.R. (1993a): "The Kuznets Process and the Inequality-Development Relationship", Journal of Development Economics, 40, pp. 25-52.
  • Anand, S; Kanbur, S.M.R. (1993b): "Inequality and Development. A Critique", Journal of Development Economics, 41, pp. 19-43.
  • Anselin, L.; Florax, R.J.G.M.; Rey, S.J. [ed.] (2004): Advances in Spatial Econometrics. Methodology, Tools and Applications. Berlin: Springer.
  • Banerjee, A.V.; Duflo, E. (2003): "Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?", Journal of Economic Growth, 8, pp. 267-299.
  • Barro, R. (2000): "Inequality and Growth in a Panel of Countries", Journal of Economic Growth, 5, pp. 5-32.
  • Boruguignon, F.; Morrison, C. (1998): "Inequality and Development: The Role of Dualism", Journal of Development Economics, 57, pp. 233-257.
  • Chambers, D. (2007): "Trading Places: Does Past Growth Impact Inequality?", Journal of Development Economics, 82, pp. 257-266.
  • Cowell, F.A. (2000): Measuring Inequality. 3a ed. (London School of Economics Series). London: Oxford University Press.
  • Deininger, K.; Squire, L. (1998): "New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth", Journal of Development Economics, 57, pp. 259-287.
  • Ezcurra, R. (2007): "Is Income Inequality Harmful for Regional Growth? Evidence from the European Union", Urban Studies, 44, pp. 1953-1971.
  • Fallah, B.N.; Partridge, M. (2007): "The Elusive Inequality-Economic Growth Relationship: Are there Differences between Cities and the Countryside?", American Regional Science, 41, pp. 375-400.
  • Frank, M.W. (2009): "Inequality and Growth in the United States: Evidence from a New State-Level Panel of Income Inequality Measures", Economic Inquiry, 47 (1), pp. 55-68.
  • Galbraith, J.K.; Berner, M. (2004[2001]): Desigualdad y cambio industrial. Una perspectiva global. Madrid: Akal.
  • Galor, O. (2000): "Income Distribution and the Process of Development", European Economic Review, 44, pp. 706-712.
  • Galor, O.; Moav, O. (2004): "From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation; Inequality and the Process of Development", Review of Economics Studies, 71, pp. 1001-1026.
  • Gordon, R.J.; Dew-Becker, I. (2008): Controversies about the Rise in American Inequality: A Survey. (NBER Working Paper Series, 13982). Cambridge, MA: The National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). <www.nber.org/papers/w13982>.
  • Huang, H.C.R. (2004): "A Flexible Nonlinear Inference to the Kuznets Hypothesis", Economics Letters, 84, pp. 289-296.
  • Kuznets, S. (1955): "Economic Growth and Income Inequality", American Economic Review, 45 (1), pp. 1-28.
  • Lin, S.C.; Huang, H.C.R.; Weng, H.W. (2006): "A Semiparametric Partially Linear Investigation of the Kuznets' Hypothesis", Journal of Comparative Economics, 34, pp. 634-647.
  • List, J.A.; Gallet, C.A. (1999): "The Kuznets Curve: What Happens after the U-Inverted?", Review of Development Economics, 3 (2), pp. 200-206.
  • Mercader-Prats, M.; Levy, H. (2004): The Role of Tax and Transfers in Reducing Personal Income Inequality in Europe's Regions: Evidence from EUROMOD. (EUROMOD Working Paper Series EM9/04). Colchester: University of Essex, Institute for Social & Economic Research (ISER).
  • Molero, R.; Vayá, E. (2000): Técnicas econométricas para el tratamiento de datos espaciales: la econometría espacial. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona.
  • Mushinski, D. (2001): "Using Non-Parametrics to Inform Parametric Tests of Kuznets' Hypothesis", Applied Economics Letters, 8 (2), pp. 77-79.
  • Panizza, U. (2002): "Income Inequality and Economic Growth: Evidence from American Data", Journal of Economic Growth, 7, pp. 25-41.
  • Partridge, M.D. (1997): "Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Comment", American Economic Review, 87, pp. 1019-1032.
  • Partridge, M.D. (2005): "Does Income Distribution Affect U.S. State Economic Growth", Journal of Regional Science, 45, pp. 363-394.
  • Peracchi, F. (2002): "The European Community Household Panel: A Review", Empirical Economics, 27, pp. 63-90.
  • Persson, T.; Tabellini, G. (1994): "Is Inequality Harmful for Growth?", American Economic Review, 84, pp. 600-621.
  • Perugini, C.; Martino, G. (2008): "Income Inequality within European Regions. Determinants and Effects on Growth", Review of Income and Wealth, 54 (3), pp. 373-406.
  • Ray, D. (2002): Economía del desarrollo. Barcelona: Bosch.
  • Rodríguez, D.; Vence, X. (2007): "Is it the End of the U-Inverted Relationship between Income and Inequality. An Appraisal from European Regions", ECINEQ 2007. Berlin: The Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (ECINEQ).
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A.; Tselios, V. (2009a): "Education and Income Inequality in the Regions of the European Union", Journal of Regional Science, 49 (3), pp. 411-437.
  • Rodríguez-Pose, A.; Tselios, V. (2009b): "Inequalities in Income and Education and Regional Economic Growth in Western Europe", Annals of Regional Science, 44 (2), pp. 349-375.
  • Ruppert, D.; Wand, M.P.; Carroll, R.J. (2009): Semiparametric Regression During 2003-2007. <http://cran.rproject.org>.
  • Saith, A. (1983): "Development and Distribution. A Critique of the Cross-Country U-Hypothesis", Journal of Development Economics, 13, pp. 367-382.
  • Troitiño, A. (2005): "Inequality of Disposable Income within and between the UE (15) Countries. Levels, Sensitivity and Recent Evolution Using the ECHP (1994-01)", ECINEQ 2005. Palma de Mallorca: The Society for the Study of Economic Inequality (ECINEQ).
  • Vence, X. (2005): O fracaso neoliberal na Galiza. Vigo: A Nosa Terra.
  • Wand, M.P. et al. (2005): SemiPar 1.0. R package. <http://cran.rproject.org>.
  • Zweimüller, J. (2000): Inequality, Redistribution and Economic Growth. (Working Paper, 31). Zurich: University of Zurich, Institute of Empirical Research in Economics.
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet