Un análisis computacional de las líneas prehistóricasdiseños geométricos y lenguaje

  1. Longa Martínez, Víctor Manuel
Revista:
Zephyrus: Revista de prehistoria y arqueología

ISSN: 0514-7336

Ano de publicación: 2013

Número: 71

Páxinas: 15-43

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Zephyrus: Revista de prehistoria y arqueología

Resumo

El enfoque usual en Paleoantropología y Arqueología ha sido analizar los restos prehistóricos desde la perspectiva de la conducta con la que pudieron asociarse �simbólica, tecnológica, social, etc. En lo que respecta al lenguaje, la presencia de objetos simbólicos en el registro arqueológico se ha tomado como indicador automático de la existencia de lenguaje complejo en la Prehistoria. Este trabajo presenta un enfoque muy diferente: analizar los restos prehistóricos desde la perspectiva de los procesos y las capacidades computacionales mentales requeridas para producir esos objetos. Esta perspectiva deja de lado la �semántica� de las piezas �su posible carácter simbólico o representacional�, para centrarse en el análisis de rasgos puramente formales que revelen una complejidad computacional semejante a la del lenguaje. El artículo analiza desde esa perspectiva (1) los diseños geométricos producidos en el Paleolítico medio e inferior de Eurasia por especies como Homo neanderthalensis y quizás Homo heidelbergensis, y (2) los diseños geométricos producidos durante la Edad de la Piedra Media africana por los Humanos Anatómicamente Modernos. La comparación en términos computacionales entre ambos tipos de diseños permite inferir el tipo de lenguaje asociado a esas especies.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • AMBROSE, S. (2001): “Paleolithic technology and human evolution”, Science, 291, pp. 1748-1753.
  • ANDERSON, S. y LIGHTFOOT, D. (2002): The language organ. Linguistics as cognitive physiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • ARBIB, M. (2005): “The Mirror System hypothesis: How did protolanguage evolve?”. En TALLERMAN,M. (ed.): Language origins. Perspectives on evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 21-47.
  • ARSUAGA, J. L. y MARTÍNEZ, I. (1998): La especie elegida.La larga marcha de la evolución humana. Madrid:Temas de Hoy.
  • BADDELEY, A. (1986): Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • BADDELEY, A. (2007): Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • BALARI, S.; BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A.; CAMPS, M.; LONGA,V. M. y LORENZO, G. (2012): “Knots, language, and computation: A bizarre love triangle? Replies to objections”, Biolinguistics, 6/1, pp. 79-111.
  • BALARI, S.; BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A.; CAMPS, M.;LONGA, V. M.; LORENZO, G. y URIAGEREKA, J.(2008): “¿Homo loquens neanderthalensis? Entorno a las capacidades simbólicas y lingüísticas del Neandertal”, Munibe, 59, pp. 3-24.
  • BALARI, S.; BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A.; CAMPS, M.;LONGA, V. M.; LORENZO, G. y URIAGEREKA, J. (2011): “The archaeological record speaks: Bridging Anthropology and Linguistics”, International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol. 2011, pp. 1-17,doi: 10.4061/2011/382679.
  • BALARI, S.; BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A.; CAMPS, M.;LONGA, V. M.; LORENZO, G. y URIAGEREKA, J. (2013): “The fossils of language: What are they, who has them, how did they evolve?”. En BOECKX,C. y GROHMANN, K. K. (eds.): Handbook of Biolin-guistics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • BALARI, S. y LORENZO, G. (2009): “Computational phenotypes: Where the theory of computation meets Evo-Devo”, Biolinguistics, 3/1, pp. 2-60.
  • BALARI, S. y LORENZO, G. (2013): Computational phenotypes. Towards an evolutionary developmental biolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • BAR-YOSEF, O. (2008): “Can Paleolithic stone artifacts serve as evidence for prehistoric language?”. En BENGTSON, J. (ed.): In hot pursuit of Prehistory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 373-379.
  • BATESON, P. (2001): “Behavioral development and Darwinian evolution”. En OYAMA, S.; GRIFFITHS,P. y GRAY, R. (eds.): Cycles of contingencies. Developmental systems and evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 149-166.
  • BEDNARIK, R. (1995): “Concept-mediated marking in the Lower Palaeolithic”, Current Anthropology,36/4, pp. 605-616.
  • BEDNARIK, R. (2003): “The earliest evidence of palaeo art”, Rock Art Research, 20, pp. 89-135.
  • BENAZZI, S. (2012): “The first modern Europeans”,Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 90, pp. 3-6.
  • BENAZZI, S.; DOUKA, K.; FORNAI, C.; BAUER, C. C.;KULLMER, O.; SVOBODA, J.; PAP, I.; MALLEGNI, F.;BAYLE, P.; COQUERELLE, M.; CONDEMI, S.; RON-CHITELLI, A.; HARVATI, K. y WEBER, G. W. (2011):“Early dispersal of modern humans in Europe andimplications for Neanderthal behavior”, Nature,479, pp. 525-528.
  • BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. y LONGA, V. M. (2011): “Elpapel del ADNfósil en Paleoantropología”, Zephy-rus, LXVII, pp. 45-68.
  • BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. y LONGA, V. M. (2012a): “Righthandedness, lateralization and language in Neanderthals: A comment on Frayer et al.(2010)”, Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 90, pp.187-192.
  • BENÍTEZ-BURRACO, A. y LONGA, V. M. (2012b): “On the inference ‘Neanderthals had FOXP2= They had complex language”. En SCOTT-PHILLIPS,T.; TAMARIZ, M.; CARTMILL, E. y HURFORD, J.(eds.): The evolution of language. Proceedings of Evolang. Singapur: World Scientific, pp. 50-57.
  • BENÍTEZBURRACO, A.; LONGA, V. M.; LORENZO, G. y URIAGEREKA, J. (2008): “Also sprach Neanderthal-sis... Or did she?”, Biolinguistics, 2/2-3, pp. 225-232.
  • BERMÚDEZ DECASTRO, J. M.ª (2010): La evolución del talento. Cómo nuestros orígenes determinan nuestro presente. Barcelona: Debate.
  • BICKERTON, D. (1990): Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • BLUMBERG, M. (2005): Basic instinct. The genesis of behavior. New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.
  • BOË, L.-J.; HEIM, J.-L.; HONDA, K. y MAEDA, S.(2002): “The potential Neanderthal vowel space was as large as that of modern humans”, Journal of Phonetics, 30/3, pp. 465-484.
  • BOË, L.-J.; MAEDA, S. y HEIM, J. L. (1999): “Neanderthalman was not morphologically handicapped for speech”, Evolution of Communication, 3/1, pp. 49-77.
  • BOTHA, R. (2009): “Theoretical underpinnings of inferences about language evolution: the syntax used at Blombos Cave”. En BOTHA, R. y KNIGHT,C. (eds.): The cradle of language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 93-111.
  • BOTHA, R. (2010): “On the soundness of inferring modern language from symbolic behaviour”, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 20, pp. 345-356.
  • BOTHA, R. y KNIGHT, C. (eds.) (2009): The cradle of language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • BRESNAN, J.; KAPLAN, R.; PETERS, S. y ZAENEN, A.(1987): “Cross-serial dependencies in Dutch”. En SAVITCH, W.; BACH, E.; MARSH, W. y SAFRAN-NAVEH, G. (eds.): The formal complexity of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 286-319.
  • CAMPS, M. y URIAGEREKA, J. (2006): “The gordian knot of linguistic fossils”. En ROSSELLÓ, J. y MARTÍN, J. (eds.): The biolinguistic turn. Issues on language and biology. Barcelona: Universitat de Barcelona, pp. 34-65.
  • CARROLL, S. (2005): Endless forms most beautiful. The new science of Evo Devo and the making of the animal kingdom. New York: W.W. Norton.
  • CARSTAIRS-MCCARTHY, A. (1999): The origins of complex language. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • CHALINE, J. (1994): Une famille peu ordinaire. Du singea l’homme. Paris: Du Seuil.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (1956): “Three models for the description of language”, IRE Transactions on InformationTheory, 2, pp. 113-124.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (1959): “On certain formal properties of grammars”, Information and Control, 2, pp. 137-167.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (1980): Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (1988): Language and problems of knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (1995): The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (1998): Una aproximación naturalista a la mente yal lenguaje. Barcelona: Prensa Ibérica.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (2000): The architecture of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • CHOMSKY, N. (2002): On nature and language. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
  • COOLIDGE, F. L. y WYNN, T. (2004): “A cognitive and neuropsychological perspective on the Châtelper-ronian”, Journal of Anthropological Research, 60, pp.55-73.
  • COOLIDGE, F. L. y WYNN, T. (2009): The rise of Homo sapiens. The evolution of modern thinking. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • CRÉMADES, M.; LAVILLE, H.; SIRAKOV, N. y KOZ-LOWSKI, J. (1995): “Une pierre gravée de 50000 ans B.P. dans les Balkans”, Paléo, 7, pp. 201-209.
  • CRYSTAL, D. (2010): The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. 3rded. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • DAVIDSON, I. y NOBLE, W. (1989): “The archaeology of perception: Traces of depiction and language”, Current Anthropology, 30, pp. 125-155.
  • DENNETT, D. (1995): Darwin’s dangerous idea. NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
  • DENNETT, D. (1996): Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.
  • DIBBLE, H. y BAR-YOSEF, O. (1995): The definition and interpretation of Levallois technology. Madison: Prehistory Press.
  • ECO, U. (1975): Trattato di semiotica generale. Milano: Bompiani.
  • ENARD, W.; PRZEWORSKI, M.; FISHER, S.; LAI, C. S.; WIEBE, V.; KITANO, T.; MONACO, A. P. y PÄÄBO, S.(2002): “Molecular evolution of FOXP2, a gene involved in speech and language”, Nature, 418, pp.869-872.
  • ERRICO, F. D’ (2001): “Memories out of mind: The archaeology of the oldest artificial memory systems”. En NOWELL, A. (ed.): In the mind’s eye: Multidisciplinary approaches to the evolution of human cognition. Ann Arbor: International Monographs in Prehistory, pp. 33-49.
  • ERRICO, F. D’ (2003): “The invisible frontier: A multispecies model for the origin of behavioral modernity”, Evolutionary Anthropology, 12, pp. 188-202.
  • ERRICO, F. D’; HENSHILWOOD, C.; LAWSON, G.; VAN-HAEREN, M.; TILLIER, A.-M.; SORESSI, M.; BRES-SON, F.; MAUREILLE, B.; NOWELL, A.; LAKARRA, J.;BACKWELL, L. y JULIEN, M. (2003): “Archaeological evidence for the emergence of language, symbolism, and music–An alternative multidisciplinary perspec-tive”, Journal of World Prehistory, 17, pp. 1-70.
  • ERRICO, F. D’; HENSHILWOOD, C.; VANHAEREN, M. y NIEKERK, K. VAN(2005): “Nassarius kraussianus shell beads from Blombos Cave: evidence for symbolic behaviour in the Middle Stone Age”, Journal of Human Evolution, 48, pp. 3-24.
  • ERRICO, F. D’ y VANHAEREN, M. (2009): “Earliest personal ornaments and their significance for the origin of language debate”. En BOTHA, R. y KNIGHT,C. (eds.): The cradle of language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 16-40.
  • ERRICO, F. D’; VANHAEREN, M.; HENSHILWOOD, C.;LAWSON, G.; MAUREILLE, B.; GAMBIER, D.; TILLIER,A.-M.; SORESSI, M. y NIEKERK, K. VAN(2009): “From the origin of language to the diversification of languages: What can archaeology and palaeoanthropology say?”. En ERRICO, F. D’ y HOMBERT, J.M. (eds.): Becoming elocuent. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 13-68.
  • ERRICO, F. D’ y VILLA, P. (1997): “Holes and grooves: the contribution of microscopy and taphonomy to the problem of art origins”, Journal of Human Evolution, 33, pp. 1-31.
  • EVERETT, D. (2005): “Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language”, Current Anthropology, 46/4, pp. 621-646.
  • FALK, D. (1975): “Comparative anatomy of the larynxin man and in chimpanzee: Implications for language in Neanderthal”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 43/1, pp. 123-132.
  • FINLAYSON, C. (2009): The humans who went extinct. Why Neanderthals died out and we survived. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • FISHER, S. y SCHARFF, C. (2009): “FOXP2 as a molecular window into speech and language”, Trends in Genetics, 25/4, pp. 166-177.
  • FITCH, W. T. (2000): “The phonetic potential of nonhuman vocal tracts: comparative cineradiographic observations of vocalizing animals”, Phonetica, 57,pp. 205-218.
  • FITCH, W. T. (2002): “Comparative vocal production and the evolution of speech: reinterpreting the descent of the larynx”. En WRAY, A. (ed.): ThFITCH, W. T.e transition to language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.21-45.
  • FITCH, W. T. (2009): “Fossil cues to the evolution of speech”. En BOTHA, R. y KNIGHT, C. (eds.): The cradle of language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.112-134.
  • FITCH, W. T. y REBY, D. (2001): “The descended larynx is not uniquely human”, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 268, pp. 1669-1675.
  • FODOR, J. (1975): The language of thought. New York:Thomas Crowell.
  • FRAYER, D.; FIORE, I.; LALUEZA-FOX, C.; RADOVČIĆ, J. y BONDIOLI, L. (2010): “Right handed Neandertals: Vindija and beyond”, Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 88, pp. 113-127.
  • FRAYER, D.; FIORE, I.; LALUEZA-FOX, C.; RADOVČIĆ, J. y BONDIOLI, L. (2012): “Reply to Benítez-Burraco & Longa: When is enough, enough?”, Journal of Anthropological Sciences, 90, pp. 193-197.
  • FREY, R. y RIEDE, T. (2003): “Sexual dimorphism of the larynx of the Mongolian Gazelle (Procapra guturosa Pallas, 1777) (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Bovidae)”, Zoologischer Anzeiger, 242, pp. 33-62.
  • GALLISTEL, R. y KING, A. (2009): Memory and the computational brain: Why cognitive science will transform neuroscience. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • GRÄFF, J. y MANSUY, I. M. (2008): “Epigenetic codesin cognition and behaviour”, Behavioural Brain Research, 192, pp. 70-87.
  • HARROD, J. (2007): “Deciphering Later Acheulian period marking motifs (LAmrk): Impressions of the Later Acheulian mind”. Accesible en www.origin-snet.org/publications.html
  • HARVATI, K. (2010): “Neanderthals”, Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3/3, pp. 367-376.
  • HAUSER, M. D.; CHOMSKY, N. y FITCH, W. T. (2002):“The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?”, Science, 298, pp. 1569-1579.
  • HAUSER, M. D. y FITCH, W. T. (2003): “What are theuniquely human components of the language faculty?”. En CHRISTIANSEN, M. y KIRBY, S. (eds.): Language evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 158-181.
  • HENSHILWOOD, C. y DUBREUIL, B. (2009): “Reading the artifacts: Gleaning language skills from the Middle Stone Age in southern Africa”. En BOTHA,R. y KNIGHT, C. (eds.): The cradle of language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 41-61.
  • HENSHILWOOD, C.; ERRICO, F. D’ y WAT T S, I. (2009): “Engraved ochres from the Middle Stone Age levels of Blombos Cave, South Africa”, Journal of Human Evolution, 57, pp. 27-47.
  • HENSHILWOOD, C.; ERRICO, F. D’; YATES, R.; JACOBS,Z.; TRIBOLO, C.; DULLER, G.; MERCIER, N.; SEALY,J.; VALLADAS, H.; WAT T S, I. y WINTLE, A. (2002): “Emergence of modern human behavior: Middle Stone Age engravings from South Africa”, Science, 295, pp. 1278-1280.
  • HENSHILWOOD, C. y MAREAN, C. (2003): “The origin of modern human behavior. Critique of the models and their test implications”, Current Anthropology, 44, pp. 627-651.
  • HERZFELD, C. y LESTEL, D. (2005): “Knot tying in greatapes: Etho-ethnology of an unusual tool behavior”, Social Science Information, 44, pp. 621-653.
  • HIGHAM, T.; JACOBI, R.; JULIEN, M.; DAVID, F.;BASELL, L.; WOOD, R.; DAVIES, W. y RAMSEY, C.(2010): “Chronology of the Grotte du Renne (France) and implications for the context of ornaments and human remains within the Châtelpe -rronian”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107/47, pp. 20234-20239.
  • HUYBREGTS, M. (1976): “Overlapping dependencies in Dutch”, Utrecht Working Papers in Linguistics, 1, pp. 24-65.
  • INGOLD, T. (2007): Lines. A brief history. London & New York: Routledge.
  • JABLONKA, E. y LAMB, M. (2005): Evolution in four dimensions. Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MITPress.
  • JERISON, H. (1985): “Animal intelligence as encephalization”. En WEISKRANTZ, L. (ed.): Animal intelligence. Oxford: Claredon Press, pp. 21-35.
  • JOSHI, A. (1985): “Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?”. En DOWTY, D.; KARTTUNEN, L. y ZWICKY, A. (eds.): Natural language parsing. Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 206-250.
  • KLEIN, R. (2009): The human career. 3rd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • KONOPKA, G.; BOMAR, J. M.; WINDEN, K.; COPPOLA,G.; JONSSON, Z. O.; GAO, F.; PENG, S.; PREUSS, T.M.; WOHLSCHLEGEL, J. A. y GESCHWIND, D. H.(2009): “Human-specific transcriptional regulation of CNS development genes by FOXP2”, Nature, 462, pp. 213-217.
  • KRAUSE, J.; LALUEZA-FOX, C.; ORLANDO, L.; ENARD,W.; GREEN, R. E.; BURBANO, H. A.; HUBLIN, J. J.;HÄNNI, C.; FORTEA, J.; RASILLA, M. DE LA;BERTRANPETIT, J.; ROSAS, A. y PÄÄBO, S. (2007): “The derived FOXP2 variant of modern humans was shared with Neandertals”, Current Biology, 17, pp.1908-1912.
  • LANGLEY, M.; CLARKSON, C. y ULM, S. (2008):“Behavioural complexity in Eurasian Neanderthal populations: A chronological examination of the archaeological evidence”, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 18/3, pp. 289-307.
  • LEMAY, M. (1975): “The language capability of Neandertal man”, American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 42/1, pp. 9-14.
  • LEVELT, W. (2008): An introduction to the theory of formal languages and automata. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • LEWIS-WILLIAMS, D. (2002): The mind in the cave. Consciousness and the origins of art. London: Thames & Hudson. Cito por la trad. esp., La mente en la caverna. La conciencia y los orígenes del arte. Madrid: Akal, 2005.
  • LHOMME, V. y NORMAND, E. (1993): “Présentation des galets striés de la couche inférieure du gisement moustérien de ‘Chez Pourre-Chez Comte’ (Corèze)”, Paléo, 5, pp. 121-125.
  • LI, S.; WEIDENFELD, J. y MORRISEY, E. E. (2004): “Transcriptional and DNA binding activity of the Foxp1/2/4 family is modulated by heterotypic and homotypic protein interactions”, Molecular and Cellular Biology, 24, pp. 809-822.
  • LIEBERMAN, P. (1984): The biology and evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • LIEBERMAN, P. (1991): Uniquely human. The evolution of speech, thought, and selfless behavior. Cambridge, MA: Har-vard University Press.
  • LIEBERMAN, P. (2000): Human language and our reptilian brain. The subcortical bases of speech, syntax, and thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • LIEBERMAN, P. (2003): “Motor control, speech, and the evolution of human language”. En CHRISTIANSEN, M. y KIRBY, S. (eds.): Language evolution. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 255-271.
  • LIEBERMAN, P. (2006): Toward an evolutionary biology of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • LIEBERMAN, P. (2007): “The evolution of human speech. Its anatomical and neural bases”, Current Anthropology, 48/1, pp. 39-66.
  • LIEBERMAN, P. y CRELIN, E. (1971): “On the speech of Neanderthal man”, Linguistic Inquiry, 2, pp. 203-222.
  • LONGA, V. M. (2005): “Bibliografía comentada sobre la emergencia y la evolución del lenguaje (1990-2004)”, Moenia, 11, pp. 423-458.
  • LONGA, V. M. (2006): “Sobre el significado del descubrimiento del gen FOXP2”, Estudios de Lingüística. Universidad de Alicante, 20, pp. 177-207.
  • LONGA, V. M. (2012a): Lenguaje humano y comunicación animal: análisis comparativo. Bucaramanga: Universidad Industrial de Santander.
  • LONGA, V. M. (2012b): “Qué revelan las representaciones materiales de la Prehistoria sobre representaciones mentales”, Representaciones. Revista de Estudios sobre Representación en Arte, Ciencia y Filosofía, 8/1, pp.79-104.
  • MACKAY, A. y WELZ, A. (2008): “Engraved ochre from a Middle Stone Age context at Klein Kliphuis in the Western Cape of South Africa”, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35/6, pp. 1521-1532.
  • MARSHACK, A. (1976): “Some implications of the Paleolithic symbolic evidence for the origin of language”, Current Anthropology, 17, pp. 274-282.
  • MARSHACK, A. (1996): “A Middle Paleolithic symbolic composition from the Golan Heights: The earliest known depictive image”, Current Anthropology, 37, pp.357-365.
  • MARSHACK, A. (1997): “Paleolithic image making and symboling in Europe and the Middle East: A comparative review”. En CONKEY, M.; SOFFER, O.; STRATMANN,D. y JABLONSKI, N. (eds.): Beyond art. Pleistocene image and symbol. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences, pp. 53-91.
  • MARTÍNEZ MENDIZÁBAL, I. y ARSUAGA, J. L. (2009):“El origen del lenguaje: la evidencia paleontológica”, Munibe (Antropologia-Arkeologia), 60, pp. 5-16.
  • MATTICK, J. S.; TAFT, R. J. y FAULKNER, G. J. (2009):“A global view of genomic information: moving beyond the gene and the master regulator”, Trends in Genetics, 26, pp. 21-28.
  • MCBREARTY, S. y BROOKS, A. (2000): “The revolutionthat wasn’t: A new interpretation of the origin of modern human behavior”, Journal of Human Evolution, 39, pp. 453-563.
  • MEHLER, M. F. (2008): “Epigenetic principles and mechanisms underlying nervous system functions in health and disease”, Progress in Neurobiology, 86,pp. 305-341.
  • MELLARS, P. (1996): “Symbolism, language, and the Neanderthal mind”. En MELLARS, P. y GIBSON, K. (eds.): Modelling the early human mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 15-32.
  • MELLARS, P. (1998): “Neanderthals, modern humans and the archaeological evidence for language”. En JABLONS-KI, N. y AIELLO, L. C. (eds.): The origin and diversification of language. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences, pp. 89-115.
  • MELLARS, P. (2005): “The impossible coincidence. A single-species model for the origins of modern human behavior in Europe”, Evolutionary Anthropology, 14, pp. 12-27.
  • MITHEN, S. (2005): The singing Neanderthals. London: Weidenfeld & Nicholson.
  • MOORE, D. S. (2001): The dependent gene. The fallacy of ‘nature vs. nurture’. New York: Henry Holt.
  • MORENO CABRERA, J. C. (2000): La dignidad e igualdad de las lenguas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • MOSS, L. (2003): What genes can’t do. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • NEVINS, A.; PESETSKY, D. y RODRÍGUEZ, C. (2009): “Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment”, Language,85/2, pp. 355-404.
  • NISHIMURA, T.; MIKAMI, A.; SUZUKI, J. y MATSUZAWA,T. (2006): “Descent of the hyoid in chimpanzees: evolution of face flattening and speech”, Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51, pp. 244-254.
  • NOWELL, A. (2006): “From a Paleolithic art to Pleistocene visual cultures (Introduction to ‘Advances in the Study of Pleistocene imagery and symboluse’)”, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13/4, pp. 239-249.
  • NOWELL, A. y ERRICO, F. D’ (2007): “The art of taphonomy and the taphonomy of art: Layer IV, Molodova I, Ukraine”, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14/1, pp. 1-26.
  • PARKINGTON, J.; POGGENPOEL, C.; RIGAUD, J. P. y TEXIER, P. (2005): “From tool to symbol: the behavioural context of intentionally marked ostricheggshell from Diepkloof, Western Cape”. En ERRI-CO, F. D’ y BACKWELL, L. (eds.): From tools to symbols. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press, pp. 475-492.
  • PETERSSON, K.; FOLIA, V. y HAGOORT, P. (2012):“What artificial grammar learning reveals about the neurobiology of syntax”, Brain and Language,120/2, pp. 83-95.
  • PIATTELLI-PALMARINI, M. y URIAGEREKA, J. (2005):“The evolution of the narrow faculty of language: The skeptical view and a reasonable conjecture”, Lingue e Linguaggio, IV, pp. 27-79.
  • PORTNER, P. (2005): What is meaning? Fundamentals of formal semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • PROCTOR, R. (2007): “Material metaphors. Review of Origins and revolutions by Clive Gamble”, Nature, 448, pp. 752-753.
  • PTA K, S.; ENARD, W.; WIEBE, V.; HELLMANN, I.;KRAUSE, J.; LACHMANN, M. y PÄÄBO, S. (2009): “Linkage disequilibrium extends across putative selected sites in FOXP2”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26/10, pp. 2181-2184.
  • ROEBROEKS, W. y VERPOORTE, A. (2009): “A ‘language-free’ explanation for differences between the European Middle and Upper Paleolithic record”. En BOTHA, R. y KNIGHT, C. (eds.): The cradle of language. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.150-166.
  • ROSAS, A. (2010): Los neandertales. Madrid: CSIC/Catarata.
  • RUSSELL, J. (1996): “Development and evolution of the symbolic function: The role of working memory”. En MELLARS, P. y GIBSON, K. (eds.): Modelling the early human mind. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 159-170.
  • SANCHIDRIÁN, J. L. (2001): Manual de arte prehistórico. Barcelona: Ariel edit.
  • SAVA G E-RUMBAUGH, S. y LEWIN, R. (1994): Kanzi: the ape at the brink of the human mind. New York: John Wiley.
  • SAVITCH, W.; BACH, E.; MARSH, W. y SAFRAN-NAVEH,G. (1987): “Introduction”. En SAVITCH, W.; BACH,E.; MARSH, W. y SAFRAN-NAVEH, G. (eds.): The formal complexity of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. VII-XV.
  • SORESSI, M. y ERRICO, F. D’ (2007): “Pigments, gravures, parures: les comportements symboliques controversés des Néandertaliens”. En VANDERMEERSCH, B. y MAUREILLE, B. (eds.): Les Néandertaliens. Biologie etcultures. Paris: Éditions du CTHS, pp. 297-309.
  • STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. (1998): “The particulate origins of language generativity: from syllable to gesture”. En HURFORD, J.; STUDDERT-KENNEDY, M. y KNIGHT, C. (eds.): Approaches to the evolution of language. Social and cognitive bases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202-221.
  • TEXIER, P.-J.; PORRAZ, G.; PARKINGTON, J.; RIGAUD, J.-P.; POGGENPOEL, C.; MILLER, C.; TRIBOLO, C.;CARTWRIGHT, C.; COUDENNAU, A.; KLEIN, R.;STEELE, T. y VERNA, C. (2010): “A Howiesons Poort tradition of engraving ostrich eggshell containers dated to 60,000 years ago at Diepkloof Rock Shelter, South Africa”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, pp. 6180-6185.
  • TRINKAUS, E. (2007): “Human evolution: Neandertal gene speaks out”, Current Biology, 17, pp. R917-R918.
  • VANHAEREN, M.; ERRICO, F. D’; STRINGER, C.; JAMES,S.; TODD, J. y MIENIS, H. (2006): “Middle Paleolithic shell beads in Israel and Algeria”, Science, 312, pp. 1785-1788.
  • WEST-EBERHARD, M. J. (2003): Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • WHITE, R. (1998): “Comment on d’Errico et al. 1998, ‘Neandertal acculturation in Western Europe?’”,Current Anthropology, 39/2, pp. S30-S32.
  • WYNN, T. (1991): “Tools, grammar, and the archaeolo-gy of cognition”, Cambridge Archaeological Journal,1/2, pp. 191-206.
  • WYNN, T. y COOLIDGE, F. L. (2004): “The expert Neandertal mind”, Journal of Human Evolution, 46, pp. 467-487.
  • WYNN, T. y COOLIDGE, F. L. (2010): “How Levallois reduction is similar to, and not similar to, playing chess”. En NOWELL, A. y DAVIDSON, I. (eds.): Stone tools and the evolution of human cognition. Boulder: University Press of Colorado, pp. 83-103.
  • WYNN, T. y COOLIDGE, F. L. (eds.) (2010): “Working memory: Beyond language and symbolism”, Current Anthropology, 51, Supplement 1.
  • WYNN, T. y COOLIDGE, F. L. (2011): “The implications of the working memory model for the evolution of modern cognition”, International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, vol.2011, pp. 1-12, doi: 10.4061/2011/741357.
  • WYNN, T. y COOLIDGE, F. L. (2012): How to think like a Neandertal. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • ZILHÃO, J.; ANGELUCCI, D.; BADAL-GARCÍA, E.; ERRICO, F. D’; DANIEL, F.; DAYET, L.; DOUKA, K.;HIGHAM, T.; MARTÍNEZ-SÁNCHEZ, M. J.; MONTES-BERNÁRDEZ, R.; MURCIA-MASCARÓS, S.; PÉREZ-SIRVENT, C.; ROLDÁN-GARCÍA, C.; VANHAEREN,M.; VILLAVERDE, V.; WOOD, R. y ZAPATA, J.(2009): “Symbolic use of marine shells and mineral pigments by Iberian Neanderthals”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 107, pp.1023-1028.