The role of gender identity in adolescents� antisocial behavior

  1. Moreira Trillo, Vanesa
  2. Mirón Redondo, Lourdes
Journal:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Year of publication: 2013

Volume: 25

Issue: 4

Pages: 507-513

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Psicothema

Abstract

Background: Analysis of the relevance of the variables sex and gender to explain delinquency is a topic of growing interest in Criminology. This study tests a model of juvenile delinquency that integrates gender identity, the association with deviant peers, and a lack of attachment to conventional contexts. Method: We used a sample of 970 adolescents of both sexes, representative of the urban population, between 12 and 18 years, attending public schools in Galicia (Spain). Results: The results of path analysis confirm that: a) weak attachment to conventional contexts, and belonging to a deviant groups are precedents for deviation of adolescents of both sexes; b) these contexts also contribute to the development of gender identity; and c) gender identity affects the likelihood of deviation: femininity tends to reduce this behavior, and masculinity (in particular, negatively valued masculinity) contributes to increase it. Conclusions: These findings support the adequacy of including gender identity in the explanatory models of delinquency. They also suggest the need to reconsider the role of conventional settings in the socialization of masculinity and, therefore, in the genesis of adolescent delinquency of both sexes.

Bibliographic References

  • Akers, R., Krohn, M.D., Lanza-Kaduce, L., & Radosevich, M. (1979). Social learning and deviant behavior: A specific test of a general theory. American Sociological Review, 4(4), 635-655.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Belknap, J., & Holsinger, K.R. (2006). The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 48-71.
  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676-713.
  • Campbell, A. (1984). The girls in the gang. A report from New York City. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Danoff-Burg, S., Mosher, C.E., & Grant, C.A. (2006). Relations of agentic and communal personality traits to health behavior and substance use among college students. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(2), 353-363.
  • Elliott, D.S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Esbensen, F.A., & Weerman, F.M. (2005). Youth gangs and troublesome youth groups in the United States and the Netherlands. A cross-national comparison. European Journal of Criminology, 2(1), 5-37.
  • Fernández-Dols, J.M. (1998). De la violencia y otros trapos sucios: una introducción a la Psicología Social [Of violence and other dirty linen: An introduction to Social Psychology]. In C. Ruidíaz (Comp.), Violencia juvenil desde una perspectiva multidisciplinar [Juvenile violence from a multidisciplinary perspective] (pp. 27-42). Madrid: Edersa.
  • Fritz, H.L., & Helgeson, V.S. (1998). Distinctions of unmitigated communion from communion: Self-neglect and over-involvement with others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 121-140.
  • Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2006). The role of masculinity in children's bullying. Sex Roles, 54(7-8), 585-588.
  • Giordano, P.C., & Rockwell, S.M. (2000). Differential association theory and female crime. In S. Simpson (Ed.), Crime and criminality (pp. 3-24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.
  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Haynie, D.L. (2002). Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 18(2), 99-134.
  • Heimer, K., & De Costner, S. (1999). The gendering of violent delinquency. Criminology, 37(2), 277-318.
  • Helgeson, V.S., & Fritz, H.L. (2000). The implications of unmitigated agency and unmitigated communion for domains of problem behavior. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 1031-1057.
  • Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Horwitz, A., & Raskin, H. (1987). Gender role orientations and styles of pathology among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 2(2), 158-170.
  • Lengua, L.J., & Stormshak, E.A. (2000). Gender, gender roles, and personality: Gender differences in the prediction of coping and psychological symptoms. Sex Roles, 43(11-12), 787-820.
  • Linden, R., & Fillmore, C. (1981). A comparative study of delinquency involvement. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 18(3), 343-361.
  • Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Van Kammen, W.B., & Farrington, D.P. (1991). Initiation, escalation, and desistance in juvenile offending and their correlates. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 8(1), 36-82.
  • López, S., & Rodríguez-Arias, J.L. (2010). Factores de riesgo y de protección en el consumo de drogas en adolescentes y diferencias según edad y sexo [Risk and protection factors in adolescents' drug consumption and age and sex differences]. Psicothema, 22(4), 568-573.
  • Maccoby, E.E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  • Mirón, L., & Otero-López, J. (2005). Jóvenes delincuentes [Young delinquents]. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • Mosher, C.E., & Danoff-Burg, S. (2005). Agentic and communal personality traits: Relations to attitudes toward sex and sexual experiences. Sex Roles, 52(1-2), 121-129.
  • Nicholas, K.B., & Bieber, S.L. (1997). Assessment of perceived parenting behaviors: The Exposure to Abusive and Supportive Environments Parenting Inventory (EASE-PI). Journal of Family Violence, 12(3), 275-291.
  • Reiss, A.J., & Farrington, D.P. (1991). Advancing knowledge about cooffending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82(2), 360-395.
  • Rodríguez, J.A., Mirón, L., & Rial, A. (2012). Análisis de la relación entre grupo de iguales, vínculos convencionales, autocontrol y conducta antisocial en una muestra de adolescentes venezolanos [Analysis of relations with peer group, conventional bonds, self-control, and antisocial behavior in a sample of Venezuelan adolescents]. Revista de Psicología Social, 27(1), 25-38.
  • Sánchez, A., Moreira, V., & Mirón, L. (2011). Sexo, género y agresión: análisis de la relación en una muestra de universitarios [Sex, gender, and aggression: Analysis of the relation in a sample of college students]. Boletín de Psicología, 101, 35-50.
  • Spence, J.T., & Helmreich, R.L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Spence, J.T., Helmreich, R.L., & Holahan, C.K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to neurotic and acting out behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1673-1682.
  • Steffensmeier, D., & Allan, E. (1996). Gender and crime: Toward a gendered theory of female offending. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 459-487.
  • Storvoll, E., & Wichstrom, L. (2002). Do the risk factors associated with conduct problems in adolescents vary according to gender? Journal of Adolescent, 25(2), 183-202.
  • Straus, M. (1979). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS). Journal of Marriage and Family, 41(1), 75-88.
  • Sutherland, E. (1939). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.
  • Wong, S.K. (2005). The effects of adolescent activities on delinquency: A differential involvement approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(4), 321-333.
Data source: Dialnet