The "impact factor style of thinking"A new theoretical framework

Referencias bibliográficas

• American Psychological Association (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington: APA Press.
• Balaban, A. T. (2012). Positive and negative aspects of citation indices and journal impact factors. Scientometrics, 9, 241-247.
• Baum, J. A. C. (2011). Free-riding on power laws: Questioning the validity of the impact factor as a measure of research quality in organization studies. Organization, 8, 449-466.
• Bengoetxea, E., & Buela-Casal, G. (2013). The new multidimensional and user-driven higher education ranking concept of the European Union. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 67-73.
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d'agir.
• Brody, S. (2013). Impact factor: Imperfect but not yet replaceable. Scientometrics, 96, 255-257.
• Buela-Casal, G. (2003). Evaluación de la calidad de los artículos y de las revistas científicas: Propuesta del factor de impacto ponderado y de un índice de calidad. Psicothema, 15, 23-35.
• Buela-Casal, G. (2010). Scientific journal impact indexes and indicators for measurement researchers' performance. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 15, 3-19.
• Buela-Casal, G., & Zych, I. (2012). What do the scientists think about the impact factor? Scientometrics, 92, 281-292.
• Calver, M. C., Lilith, M., & Dickman, C. R. (2013). A 'perverse incentive' from bibliometrics: Could National Research Assessment Exercises (NRAEs) restrict literature availability for nature conservation? Scientometrics, 95, 243-255.
• Cronin, B. (2013). Self-plagiarism: An odious oxymoron. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 873.
• Fernández-Ríos, L., & Novo, M. (2012). Positive pychology: Zeigeist (or spirit of the times) or ignorance (or disinformation) of history? International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 333-344.
• Foucault, M. (1977). Entrevue: Le jeu de Michel Foucault. Ornicar, 10, 62-93.
• Frey, B. S. (2003). Publishing as prostitution? Choosing between one's own ideas and academic success. Public Choice, 116, 205-223.
• Hartley, J. (2012). New ways of making academic articles easier to read. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 143-160.
• Harzing A. W. (2010) The publish or perish book. Melbourne: Tarma Software Research Pty Ltd.
• Laufer, M. (2013). Los valores intangibles de las publicaciones científicas. Interciencia, 38, 322.
• Leydesdorff, L. (2010) The communication of meaning and the structuration of expectations: Giddens' "structuration theory" and Luhmann's "self-organization". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 2138-2150.
• Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159, 56-63.
• Misteli, T. (2013). Eliminating the impact of the impact factor. Journal of Cell Biology, 201, 651-652.
• Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. New York: Springer.
• Moed, H. F., Colledge, L., Reedijk. J., Moya-Anegon, F., Guerrero-Bote, V., Plume, A., & Amin, M. (2012). Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way. Scientometrics, 92, 367-376.
• Olivas-Avila, J. A., & Musi-Lechuga, B. (2012a). Aprendiendo a buscar en la Web of Science: Réplica al estudio de Aluja, Becoña, Botella, Colom, Echeburúa, Forns, Pérez y Vila (2011). Psicothema, 24, 594-602.
• Olivas-Avila, J. A., & Musi-Lechuga, B. (2012b). Doctorados con Mención de Excelencia en Psicología: evidencia en tesis doctorales y artículos en la Web of Science. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12, 503-516.
• Olivas-Avila, J. A., & Musi-Lechuga, B. (2013). Aprendiendo a usar el Researcher-ID como indicador de la producción científica. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 253-260.
• Olivas-Avila, J. A., & Musi-Lechuga, B. (2014). Validez y fiabilidad del Researcher ID y de "Web of Science production of Spanish psychology". International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 14, 58-66.
• Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2012). Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 92, 395-401.
• Perestelo-Pérez, L. (2013). Standards on how to develop and report systematic reviews in Psychology and Health. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 13, 49-57.
• Pérez-Alvarez, M. (2012). La psicología positiva: magia simpática. Papeles del Psicólogo, 33, 183-201.
• Pérez-Alvarez, M. (2013). La psicología positiva y sus amigos: En evidencia. Papeles del Psicólogo, 34, 208-226.
• Pudovkin. A. I., & Garfield, E. (2012). Rank normalization of impact factors will resolve Vanclay's dilemma with TRIF. Scientometrics, 92, 409-412.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Kaufman, J. (2012). When your race is almost run, but you feel you're not yet done: Application of the propulsion theory of creative contributions to late-career challenges. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 46, 66-76.
• Vanclay, J. K. (2012). Impact factor: Outdated artefact or steppingstone to journal certification? Scientometrics, 92, 211-238.
• van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62, 133-143.
• van Raan, A. F. J. (2012). Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators. Scientometrics, 92, 457-469.
• Willmott, H. (2011). Journal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS list. Organization, 18, 429-442.
• Wouters, P., & Costas, R. (2012). Users, narcissism and control. Utrecht: SURFfoundation.