Measure of the ability to rotate mental images

  1. Campos García, Alfredo
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Ano de publicación: 2012

Volume: 24

Número: 3

Páxinas: 431-434

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: Psicothema

Resumo

El objetivo del presente trabajo era construir un nuevo test que midiese la capacidad de rotar imágenes mentales. Para ello, se construyó un cubo descompuesto que los participantes debían componer mentalmente, y después rotar, también mentalmente, y contestar a 23 preguntas referidas al cubo. Se aplicó el test, Medida de la Aptitud para Rotar Imágenes Mentales (MARMI), a un grupo de 354 participantes. Se encontró un alfa de Cronbach de .90, y altas correlaciones del test con otros tests de rotación de imágenes y de imágenes espaciales. Sin embargo, se han encontrado bajas correlaciones entre las puntuaciones del test y las respuestas a cuestionarios de viveza de imagen visual. Tanto la fiabilidad como la validez del test lo convierten en un buen instrumento para la medida de la capacidad de las personas para rotar imágenes mentales.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Blazhenkova, O., & Kozhevnikov, M. (2009). The new object-spatialverbal cognitive style model: Theory and measurement. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23, 638-663. doi:10.1002/acp.1473.
  • Blajenkova, O., Kozhevnikov, M., & Motes, M. A. (2006). Object-spatial imagery: A new self-report imagery questionnaire. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 239-263. doi:10.1002/acp.1182.
  • Burton, L.J., & Fogarty, G.J. (2003). The factor structure of visual imagery and spatial abilities. Intelligence, 31, 289-318.
  • Campos, A. (2009). Spatial imagery: A new measure of the visualization factor. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 29, 31-39. doi:10.2190/ IC.29.1.c.
  • Campos, A., & Pérez-Fabello, M.J. (2009). Psychometric quality of a Revised Version Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 108, 798-802. doi:10.2466/PMS.108.3.798-802.
  • Campos, A., Pérez-Fabello, M.J., & Gómez-Juncal, R. (2004). Gender and age differences in measured and self-perceived imaging capacity. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1383-1389. doi:10.1016/j. paid.2004.01.008.
  • Carroll, J.B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Delgado, A.R., & Prieto, G. (1996). Sex differences in visuospatial ability: Do performance factors play such an important role? Memory & Cognition, 24, 504-510.
  • Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., & Dermen, D. (1976). Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
  • Hedges, L.V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41-45.
  • Hooven, C.L., Chabris, C.F., Ellison, P.T., & Kosslyn, S.M. (2004). The relationship of male testosterone to components of mental rotation. Neuropsychologia, 42, 782-790. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.012.
  • Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Kosslyn, S.M. (1994). Image and brain: The resolution of the imagery debate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kosslyn, S.M., & Koenig, O. (1992). Wet mind: The new cognitive neuroscience. New York: Free Press.
  • Linn, M.C., & Petersen, A.C. (1985). Emergence and characterisation of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.
  • Linn, M.C., & Petersen, A.C. (1986). Gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science performance. In J. Hyde & M.C. Linn (Eds.), The psychology of gender: Advance through metaanalysis (pp. 67-101). Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Marks, D.F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64, 17-24.
  • Marks, D.F. (1995). New directions for mental imagery research. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19, 135-149.
  • McKelvie, S.J. (1995). The VVIQ as a psychometric test of individual differences in visual imagery vividness: A critical quantitative review and plea for direction. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19, 1-106.
  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Rettinger, D.A., Shah, P., & Hegarty, M. (2001). How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 621-640. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.621.
  • Oosthuizen, S. (1991). Sex-related differences in spatial ability in a group of South African students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 51-54.
  • Richardson, A. (1977). The meaning and measurement of memory imagery. British Journal of Psychology, 68, 29-43.
  • Richardson, A. (1994). Individual differences in imaging. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
  • Sanders, G., Sjodin, M., & de Chastelaine, M. (2002). On the elusive nature of sex differences in cognition: Hormonal influences contributing to within-sex variation. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31, 145-152. doi: 10.1023/A:1014095521499.
  • Sheehan, P.W. (1967). A shortened form of Betts' Questionnaire Upon Mental Imagery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 23, 386-389.
  • Thurstone, L.L., & Thurstone, T.G. (2002). Aptitudes Mentales Primarias [Primary Mental Abilities]. Madrid: TEA Ediciones (Original work published 1962).
  • Vandenberg, S.G., & Kuse, A.R. (1978). Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599-604.
  • Voyer, D. (2011). Time limits and gender differences on paper-and-pencil tests of mental rotation: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 267-277. doi:10.3758/s13423-010-0042-0.
  • Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M.P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250-270.
Fonte de datos: Dialnet