A resource-based view of university spin-off activitynew evidence from Spanish case

Bibliographic References

• Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. (2002). Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48, 44-60.
• Alemany, M. L. (2004). Impacto de las inversiones de capital riesgo en España: un análisis empírico regional (PhD thesis). Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
• Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities' patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35, 518-532.
• Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E., Causino, N., & Louis, K. (1996). Participation of life science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine, 335, 1734-1739.
• Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (1995). Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Economic Journal, 105, 333-344.
• Caldera, A., & Debande, O. (2010). Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 39, 1160-1173.
• Callan, B. (2001). Generating spin-offs: Evidence from the OECD. Science Technology Industry Review, 26, 13-56 (Special issue on Fostering High Tech Spin-Offs: A Public Strategy for Innovation).
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1986). Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29-53.
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press.
• Carayannis, E. G., Rogers, E. M., Kurihara, K., & Allbritton, M. M. (1998). High technology spin-offs from government R&D laboratories and research universities. Technovation, 18, 1-11.
• Chugh, H. (2004). New academic venture development: Exploring the influence of the technology transfer office on university spinouts (Working Paper). Tanaka Business School, Imperial College London.
• Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Lockett, A., Van de Elde, E., & Vohora, A. (2005). Spinning out new ventures: A typology of incubation strategies from European research institutions. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 183-216.
• Cosh, A., Hughes, A., & Lester, R. (2006). UK PLC just how innovative are we? Findings from the Cambridge-MIT Institute International Innovation Benchmarking Project. Cambridge MIT Institute.
• Counti, A., & Gaulé, P. (2010). Is the US outperforming Europe in university technology licensing? A new perspective on the European paradox (DRUID Working Paper). 10-14.
• Declercq, G. V. (1981). A third look at the two cultures: The new economic responsibility of the university. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 5, 117-122.
• Degroof, J. J., & Roberts, E. B. (2004). Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spin-off ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 327-352.
• Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209-227.
• Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2004). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research (Working Paper). UK: Cass Business School.
• Ensley, M., & Hmieleski, K. (2005). A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups. Research Policy, 34, 1091-1105.
• Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., Gebhardt, C., & Terra, B. (2000). The future of the university and the university of the future: Evolution of ivory tower to entrepreneurial paradigm. Research Policy, 29, 313-330.
• Fundación CYD. (2009). Executive Summary CYD Report 2008. Contributions of Spanish Universities to Development, Colección Documentos CYD, 11/2009.
• Golub, E. (2003). Generating spin-offs from university based research: The potential of technology transfer (PhD thesis). Columbia University.
• Gómez, J. M., Mira, I., Verdú, A., & Sancho, J. (2007). Las spin-offs académicas como vía de transferencia tecnológica. Economía Industrial, 366, 61-72.
• Grandi, A., & Grimaldi, R. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams. Small Business Economics, 21, 329-341.
• Grass, J., Galiana, D., Mira, I., Verdú, A., & Sancho, J. (2008). An empirical approach to the organizational determinants of spin-off creationin European universities. International Entrepreneurial Management Journal, 4, 187-198.
• Greene, W. (1998). Análisis Econométrico (3a ed). Prentice Hall.
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. A., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Análisis Multivariante (5.a ed). Prentice Hall.
• Heirman, A., & Clarysse, B. (2004). How and why do research-based start-ups differ at founding? A resource-based configurational perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29, 247-268.
• Hughes, A. (2007). University-industry linkages and UK science and innovation policy (ITEC Working Paper Series, pp. 07-24).
• Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. (2001). Proofs and prototypes for sale: The licensing of university inventions. American Economic Review, 91, 240-259.
• Landry, R., Rherrad, I., & Amara, N. (2005). The determinants of university spin-offs: Evidence from Canadian universities. In The 5th Triple Helix Conference Turin.
• Lester, R. (2005). Universities, innovation, and the competitiveness of local economies. In Summary report from the local innovation project - Phase I. Industrial Performance Center Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Industrial Performance Center.
• Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory tower's door: An analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34, 1106-1112.
• Lockett, A., & Wright, M. (2005). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies, Research Policy, 34, 1043-1057.
• Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Franklin, S. (2003). Technology transfer and universities, spin-out strategies. Small Business Economics, 20, 185-200.
• Lockett, A., Wright, M., & Vohora, A. (2004). Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research, University of Sussex Documents.
• Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• Lundqvist, M. A., & Williams, K. L. (2005). Adding licensing and venture creation to a university mission of open exchange. In The 5th Triple Helix Conference Turin.
• March-Chorda, I., Niosi, J., & Yagüe-Perales, R. M. (2010). Benchmarking Spain's Biotechnology: a comparative perspective. Journal of Biotechnology, 150, 512-513.
• Merino, C., & Villar, L. (2007). Factores de éxito en los procesos de creación de empresas de base tecnológica. Economía Industrial, 366, 147-167.
• Mian, S. A. (1996). Assessing value-added contributions of university technology business incubators to tenant firms. Research Policy, 25, 325-335.
• Montañez, B. Y. (2006). Factores condicionantes de la creación de spin-off universitarias: un estudio exploratorio. In III Jornada de Pre-comunicaciones a Congresos de Economía y Administración de Empresas Barcelona.
• Motohashi, K. (2005). University-industry collaborations in Japan: The role of new technology-based firms in transforming the National Innovation System. Research Policy, 34, 583-594.
• Office of Technology Transfer. (2007). Informe Red OTRI. Madrid: CRUE
• Ortín, P., Salas, V., Trujillo, M. V., & Vendrell, F. (2007). El spinoff universitario en España como modelo de creación de empresas intensivas en tecnología. Madrid: DGPYME
• Ortín, P., & Vendrell, F. (2010). University spin-offs vs. other NT B Fs: Productivity differences at the outset and evolution. In Third Annual Research Symposium on The Economics and Law of the Entrepreneur Chicago.
• O'Shea, R. P., Chugh, H., & Allen, T. J. (2008). Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 653-666.
• O'Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Chevalier, A., & Roche, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spin-off performance of U.S. universities. Research Policy, 34, 994-1009.
• Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. (2003). The expanding role of university patenting in the life sciences: Assessing the importance of experience and connectivity. Research Policy, 32, 1695-1711.
• Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.
• Pérez, M., & Martínez, A. (2003). The development of university spin-offs: Early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, 23, 823-831.
• Powers, J., & McDougall, P. (2005). University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: A resource based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 291-311.
• Rasmussen, E., Moen, O., & Gulbrandsen, M. (2006). Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge. Technovation, 26, 518-533.
• Rothaermel, F., Agung, S., & Jiang, L. (2006). University entrepreneurship: A taxonomy of the literature. Atlanta: Technology Transfer Society Conference.
• Shane, S. (2001). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47, 1173-1190.
• Shane, S. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Edward Elgar.
• Siegel, D., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). University commercialization of intellectual property: Policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23, 640-660.
• Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L., & Link, A. N. (2003). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14, 111-133.
• Stankiewicz, R. (1994). Spin-off companies from universities. Science and Public Policy, 21, 99-107.
• Thursby, J., & Kemp, S. (2002). Growth and productive efficiency of university intellectual property licensing. Research Policy, 31, 109-124.
• Tornatzky, L. G., Batts, Y., McCrae, N. E., Lewis, M. S., & Quittman, L. (1996). The art and craft of technology business incubation. National Business Incubation Association (NBIA).
• Van Geenhuizen, M., & Soetanto, D. (2009). Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of key obstacles to growth. Technovation, 29, 671-681.
• Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: An empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40, 553-564.
• Vinig, G. T., & Van Rijsbergen, P. J. (2010). Determinants of university technology transfer - a comparative study of US, European and Australian Universities. In A. Malach-Pines (Ed.), Handbook of research on high technology entrepreneurship. Edward Elgar.
• Vohora, A., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33, 147-175.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 171-174.
• World Bank. (2007). Doing business 2008. Washington: The World Bank.
• Zhang, J. (2009). The performance of university spin-offs: An exploratory analysis using venture capital data. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 255-285.
• Zucker, L., Darby, M., & Brewer, M. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290-306.