Percepciones de los sistemas de trabajo de alto rendimiento e intención de marchaun análisis multinivel

  1. García Chas, Romina
  2. Neira Fontela, Edelmira
  3. Varela Neira, Concepción
Revista:
Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa

ISSN: 1135-2523

Ano de publicación: 2012

Volume: 18

Número: 3

Páxinas: 206-215

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.1016/J.IEDEE.2012.06.001 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Investigaciones europeas de dirección y economía de la empresa

Resumo

La investigación sobre los sistemas de trabajo de alto rendimiento (STAR) se ha centrado principalmente en el efecto sobre el rendimiento organizativo desde una perspectiva directiva. Este estudio diferencia entre la perspectiva de los empleados y los directivos sobre los STAR y examina la relación entre ambas perspectivas y la intención de marcha en una muestra conformada por ingenieros, utilizando la metodología multinivel. Los resultados indican que existen importantes diferencias entre la percepción de los empleados del STAR y la percepción de los directivos y que el STAR intentado afecta solo indirectamente (a través del STAR experimentado) a la intención de marcha de los ingenieros.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267-299.
  • Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M., & Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role of perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29, 99-118.
  • Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P., & Kalleberg, A. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 670-687.
  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
  • Bamberger, P., & Meshoulam, I. (2000). Human resource strategy: formulation, implementation, and impact. Newbury Park: Sage Pubns.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firms resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762-765.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  • Bliese, P. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-381). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Boon, C., Den Hartog, D. N., Boselie, P., & Paauwe, J. (2011). The relationship between perceptions of HR practices and employee outcomes: examining the role of person-organisation and person-job fit. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22, 138-162.
  • Bowen, D. E., & Ostroff, C. (2004). Understanding HRM-firm performance linkages: the role of the "strength" of the HRM system. Academy of Management Review, 29, 203-221.
  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
  • Combs, J., Liu, Y., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59, 501-528.
  • Gerhart, B., Wright, P. M., McMahan, G., & Snell, S. A. (2000). Measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: how much error is there y how does it influence effect size estimates? Personnel Psychology, 53, 803-834.
  • Graen, G. B., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: developmentof leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
  • Guchait, P., & Cho, S. (2010). The impact of human resource management practices on intention to leave of employees in the service industry in India: the mediating role of organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21, 1228-1247.
  • Guest, D. E. (2002). Human resource management, corporate performance and employee well-being: building the worker into HRM. Journal of Industrial Relations, 44, 335-358.
  • Guest, D. E. (2004). The psychology of the employment relationship: An analysis based on the psychological contract. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 541-555.
  • Guzzo, R. A., & Noonan, K. A. (1994). Human resource practices as communications and the psychological contract. Human Resource Management, 33, 447-462.
  • Hom, P. W., & Griffeth, R. W. (1995). Employee turnover. South-Western: Cincinnati.
  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 635-672.
  • Igbaria, M., & Siegel, S. R. (1992). An examination of the antecedents of turnover propensity of engineers: an integrated model. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 9, 101-126.
  • Jackson, S. E., Turner, J. A., & Brief, A. P. (1987). Correlates of burnout among public service lawyers. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 8, 339-349.
  • Jacofsky, E. F., & Slocum, J. W., Jr. (1988). A longitudinal study of climates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9, 319-334.
  • James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
  • James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993). Rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
  • James, L., James, L., & Asch, D. (1990). The measuring of organizations: the role of cognition and values. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 40-89). Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
  • Kalleberg, A. L., & Rognes, J. (2000). Employment relations in Norway: some dimensionsand correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 315-335.
  • Kehoe, R., & Wright, P. (2010). The impact of high performance human resource practices on employeesǐ attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365901.
  • Kennedy, D. A. (2009). Best before forty: the shelf life of an engineer. Engineering Management Journal, 21, 19-26.
  • Khilji, S. E., & Wang, X. (2006). Intended and implemented HRM: the missing linchpin in strategic international human resource management research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 1171-1189.
  • Kim, S., Price, J. L., Mueller, C. W., & Watson, T. W. (1996). The determinants of career intent among physician at a U.S. Air Force hospital. Human Relations, 49, 947-976.
  • Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., Smith, D. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 3-16.
  • Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.
  • Kuvaas, B. (2008). An exploration of how the employee-organization relationship affects the linkage between perception of developmental human resource practices and employee outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 45, 1-25.
  • Lam, W., Chen, Z., & Takeuchi, N. (2009). Perceived human resource management practices and intention to leave of employees: the mediating role of organizational citizenship behaviour in a Sino-Japanese joint venture. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 2250-2270.
  • Lee, C. H., & Bruvold, N. T. (2003). Creating value for employees: investment in employee development. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14, 981-1000.
  • Lepak, D. P., Liao, H., Chung, Y., & Harden, E. E. (2006). A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. In J. J. Martocchio (Ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (pp. 217-271). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  • Lepak, D. P., & Snell, S. A. (2002). The human resource architecture: toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31-48.
  • Lepak, D. P., Taylor, M. S., Tekleab, A. G., Marrone, J. A., & Cohen, D. J. (2007). An examination of the use of high-investiment human resource systems for core and support employees. Human Resource Management, 46, 223-246.
  • Liao, H., Toya, K., Lepak, D., & Hong, Y. (2009). Do they see eye to eye? Management and employee perspectives of high performance work systems and influence processes on service quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 371-391.
  • Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
  • McConnell, C. R. (1999). Balancing inside and outside: preparing for tomorrow while fulfilling today's responsibilities. The Health Care Manager, 18, 73-82.
  • Melian-Gonzalez, S., & Verano-Taraconte, D. (2006). Is there more than one way to manage human resources in companies? Personnel Review, 35, 29-50.
  • Mitchel, J. O. (1981). The effect of intentions, tenure, personal, and organizational variables on managerial turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 24, 742-751.
  • Moore, J. E. (2000). One road to turnover: an examination of work exhaustion in technology professionals. Mis Quarterly, 24, 141-168.
  • Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: the psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Murphy, K. R., & Myors, B. (1998). Statistical power analysis: a simple and general modelfor traditional and modern hypothesis test. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Nishii, L., Lepak, D., & Schneider, B. (2008). Employee attributions of the 'why' ofHR practices: their effects on employee attitudes and behaviours, and customer satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 61, 503-545.
  • Nishii, L., & Wright, P. (2008). Variability within organizations: implications for strategic human resources management. In B. Smith (Ed.), The people make the place: dynamic linkages between individuals and organizations (pp. 225-248). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed). Nueva York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Osterman, P. (1987). Choice of employment systems in internal labor markets. Industrial Relations, 26, 46-67
  • Paauwe, J. (2009). HRM and performance: achievements, methodological issues and prospects. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 129-142.
  • Paauwe, J., & Boselie, P. (2005). HRM and performance: what next? Human Resource Management Journal, 15, 68-83.
  • Paré, G., & Tremblay, M. (2007). The influence of high-involvement human resourcespractices, procedural justice, organizational commitment, and citizenship behaviors on information technology professionals' turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 32, 326-357.
  • Pfeffer, J. (1994). Competitive advantage through people: unleashing the power of the work force. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., & Skrondal, A. (2008). Multilevel and longitudinal modeling using stata. Stata Corp.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1985). Issues of levels in organizational research: multi-level and cross-level. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1-37
  • Rousseau, D. M., & Greller, M. M. (1994). Human resource practices: administrative contract makers. Human Resource Management, 33, 385-401.
  • Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: an application of the climate construct. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational Climate and Culture (pp. 393-412). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Shaw, J. D., Delery, J. E., Jenkins, G. D., Jr., & Gupta, N. (1998). Anorganization-level analysis of voluntary and involuntary turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 511-525.
  • Sherman, J. D. (1986). The relationship between factors in the work environment and turnover propensities among engineering and technical support personnel, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. EM-33, 2, 72-78.
  • Steel, R. P., & Ovalle, N. K. (1984). A review and meta-analysis of research on the relationship between behavioral intentions and employee turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 673-686.
  • Subramony, M. (2009). A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human Resource Management, 48, 745-768.
  • Sun, L., Aryee, S., & Law, K. (2007). High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behavior, and organizational performance: a relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 558-577.
  • Takeuchi, R., Chen, G., & Lepak, D. P. (2009). Through the looking glass of a social system: cross-level effects of high-performance work systems on employees' attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 62, 1-29.
  • Takeuchi, R., Lepak, D. P., Wang, H., & Takeuchi, K. (2007). An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1069-1083.
  • UNESCO. (2010). Engineering: issues, challenges and opportunities for development. Paris: Unesco Publishing.
  • Van Breukelen, W., Van der Vilist, R., & Steensma, H. (2004). Voluntary employee turnover:combining variables from the "traditional" turnover literature with the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 893-914.
  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: a social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.
  • Whitener, E. (2001). Do "high commitment" human resource practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27, 515-535.
  • Wright, P. M., & Boswell, W. R. (2002). Desegregating HRM: a review and synthesis of micro and macro human resource management. Journal of Management, 28, 248-276.
  • Wright, P. M., McCormick, B., Sherman, S., & McMahan, G. (1999). The role of human resource practices in petro-chemical refinery performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 10, 551-571.
  • Wu, P. C., & Chaturvedi, S. (2009). The role of procedural justice and power distance in the relationship between high performance work systems and employee attitudes: a multilevel perspective. Journal of Management, 20, 1-20.