A participación pública na planificación forestalunha oportunidade ou unha necesidade para a súa aplicación en Galicia

Referencias bibliográficas

• Aasetre, J. (2006): "Perceptions of Communication in Norwegian Forest Management, " Forest Policy and Economics, 8, pp. 81-92.
• Alexander, S.E. (2000): "Resident Attitudes towards Conservation and Black Howler Monkeys in Belize: The Community Baboon Sanctuary, " Environmental Conservation, 27 (4), pp. 341-350.
• Ananda, J.; Herath, G. (2008): "Multi-Attribute Preference Modelling and Regional Land-Use Planning, " Ecological Economics, 65, pp. 325-335.
• Arnstein, S.R. (1969): "A Ladder of Citizen Participation, " Journal of American Institute of Planners, 35, pp. 216-224.
• Atmiş, E.; Özden, S.; Lise, W. (2007): "Public Participation in Forestry in Turkey, " Eco-logical Economics, 62, pp. 352-359.
• Barstad, J. (2004): "A Planner's View on National Forest Programmes, " en P. Glück e J. Voitleithner [ed.]: NFP Research: Its Retrospect and Outlook, pp. 65-82. Viena: Institute of Forest Sector Policy and Economics.
• Beierle, T.C.; Cayford, J. (2002): Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Envi-ronmental Decisions. Resources for the Future. Washington DC, WA: Routledge.
• Berninger, K.; Kneeshaw, D.; Messier, C. (2009): "Effects of Presenting Forest Simula-tion Results on the Forest Values and Attitudes of Forestry Professionals and Other Forest Users in Central Labrador, " Forest Policy and Economics, 11, pp. 126-133.
• Brody, S.D.; Cash, S.B. (2004): Why Resource-Based Industries Should Participate in Collaborative Ecosystem Approaches to Management: A Conceptual Framework. College Station: Texas A&M University, College of Architecture, Hazard Reduction & Recovery Center.
• Brody, S.D.; Cash, S.B.; Dyke, J.; Thornton, S. (2006): "Motivations for the Forestry Industry to Participate in Collaborative Ecosystem Management Initiatives, " Hazard For-est Policy and Economics, 8, pp. 123-134.
• Buchy, M.; Hoverman, S. (2000): "Understanding Public Participation in Forest Plan-ning: A Review, " Forest Policy and Economics, 1, pp. 15-25.
• Cash, D.; Clark, W. (2001): From Science to Policy: Assessing the Assessment. Faculty Research. (Working Papers Series RWP01-045). Boston, MA: University of Harvard, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
• Collier, M.J.; Scott, M. (2009): "Conflicting Rationalities, Knowledge and Values in Scarred Landscapes, " Journal of Rural Studies, 25, pp. 267-277.
• Cost Action FP0804 (2010): Forests Management Decision Support Systems (FORSYS). <http://fp0804.emu.ee/?id=wg4>.
• Côté, M.; Bouthillier, L. (2002): "Assesssing the Effect of Public Involvement Processes in Forest Management in Quebec, " Forest Policy and Economics, 4, pp. 213-225.
• Díaz Balteiro, L.; Romero, C. (2008): "Review Making Forestry Decisions with Multi-ple Criteria: A Review and an Assessment, " Forest Ecology and Management, 174, pp. 447-457.
• Domínguez, G.; Carbonell, X.; Plana, E.; Pecurul, M.; Rodríguez, I. (2005): "Parti-cipación pública en el Plan General de Política Forestal en Cataluña, " IV Congreso Fores-tal Español. Zaragoza: Sociedad Española de Ciencias Forestales.
• Dovie, D.B.K. (2003): "Whose Involvement?-Can Hierarchical Valuation Scheme Inter-cede for Participatory Methods for Evaluating Secondary Forest Resourceuse?, " Forest Policy and Economics, 5, pp. 265-283.
• Düzgün, M. (2003): "Advancement of Forest Village Communities through Effective Par-ticipation and Partnership in State-Owned Forestry Administration: Turkey's Case, " Con-gress Paper of the XIIth World Forestry Congress. <http://www.fao.org/DOCREP/AR TICLE/WFC/XII/0223-C1.HTM>. Quebec: The International Forestry Institute.
• Elcome, D.; Baines, J. (1999): Steps to Success. Working with Residents and Neighbours to Develop and Implement Plans for Protected Areas. Gland: IUCN.
• Elsasser, P. (2002): "Rules for Participation and Negotiation and their Possible Influence on the Content of a National Forest Program, " Forest Policy and Economics, 4 (4), pp. 291-300.
• Elsasser, P. (2007): "Do «Stakeholders» Represent Citizen Interests? An Empirical In-quiry Into Assessments of Policy Aims in the National Forest Programme for Germany, " Forest Policy and Economics, 9, pp. 1018-1030.
• España. (2003): Ley 43/2003, de 21 de noviembre, de Montes. Boletín Oficial del Estado, no 280, de 22/11/03.
• España. (2006). Ley 10/2006, de 28 de abril, por la ue se modifica la Ley 43/2003, de 21 de noviembre, de Montes. Bletín Oficial del Estado, no 102, de 29/04/06.
• España. Ley 27/2006, de 18 de julio, en la que se regulan los derechos de acceso a la in-formación, de participación pública y de acceso a la justicia en materia de medio ambien-te. Boletín Oficial del Estado, no 171, de 19/07/06.
• Galicia. (2008): Decreto 43/2008, de 28 de febreiro, polo que se determina o ámbito de aplicación dos plans de ordenación dos recursos forestais para Galicia. Diario Oficial de Galicia, no 52, de 13/03/08.
• Gerber, J. (1997): "Beyond Dualism-Tthe Social Construction of Nature and the Natural and Social Construction of Human Beings, " Progress in Human Geography, 21 (1), pp. 1-17.
• Germain, R.H.; Floyd, D.W.; Stehman, S.V. (2001): "Public Perceptions of the USDA Forest Service Public Participation Process, " Forest Policy and Economics, 3, pp. 113-124.
• Glük, P. (1999): "National Forest Programmes-Significance of a Forest Policy Frame-work, " en P. Glük, G. Oesten, H. Schanz e K.R. Colz [ed.]: Formulation and Implementa-tion of National Forest Programmes, pp. 39-51. Joensuu: European Forest Institute.
• González, I. (2007): "Los PORF en la Ley de Montes. Historia del artículo 31, " Jornada de Debate sobre PORF. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Red Temática Selvired.
• Grundmann, R. (2009): "The Role of Expertise in Governance Processes, " Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5), pp. 398-403.
• Gundersen, V.; Frivold, L.H. (2008): "Public Preferences for Forest Structures: A Re-view of Quantitative Surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden, " Urban Forestry & Ur-ban Greening, 7, pp. 241-258.
• Hansmann, R.; Koellner, T.; Scholz, R.W. (2006): "Influence of Consumers' Socioeco-logical and Economic Orientations on Preferences for Wood Products with Sustainability Labels, " Policy and Economics, 8, pp. 239-250.
• Hellström, E. (2001): Conflict Cultures-Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Environ-mental Conflicts in Forestry. (Silva Fennica Monographs, 2). Helsinki: The Finish Society of Forest Science/The Finnish Forest Research Institute.
• Higgs, G.; Berry, R.; Kidner, D.; Langford, M. (2008): "Using IT Approaches to Pro-mote Public Participation in Renewable Energy Planning: Prospects and Challenges, " Land Use Policy, 25, pp. 596-607.
• Hiltunen, V.; Kangas, J.; Pykäläinen, J. (2008): "Voting Methods in Strategic Forest Planning Experiences from Metsähallitus, " Forest Policy and Economics, 10, pp. 117-127.
• Hiltunen, V.; Kurttila, M.; Leskinen, P. Pasanen, K.; Pykäläinen, J. (2009): "Mesta: An Internet-Based Decision-Support Application for Participatory Strategic-Level Natural Resources Planning, " Forest Policy and Economics, 11, pp. 1-9.
• Hjortsø, C.N. (2004): "Enhancing Public Participation in Natural Resource Management Using Soft OR-An Application of Strategic Option Development and Analysis in Tactical Forest Planning, " European Journal of Operational Research, 152, pp. 667-683.
• Hunt, L.M.; McFarlane, B.L. (2007): "Understanding Self-Evaluations of Effectiveness by Forestry Advisory Committee Members: A Case of Ontario's Local Citizens Commit-tee Members, " Journal of Environmental Management, 83, pp. 105-114.
• ILO (2000): Public Participation in Forestry in Europe and North America: Report of the Team of Specialists on Participation in Forestry. (Report of the FAO/ECE/ILO Joint Committee Team of Specialists on Participation in Forestry). (Working Paper, 163). Ge-neva: International Labour Office (ILO).
• Janse, G. (2008): "Communication between Forest Scientists and Forest Policy-Makers in Europe-A Survey on Both Sides of the Science/Policy Interface, " Forest Policy and Eco-nomics, 10, pp. 183-194.
• Janse, G.; Konijnendijk, C. (2008): "Communication between Science, Policy and Citi-zens in Public Participation in Urban Forestry-Experiences from the Neighbourwoods Project, " Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6, pp. 23-40.
• Kangas, J.; Ron, S.; Kangas, R. (2005): "Socioecological Landscape Planning Approach and Multicriteria Acceptability Analysis in Multiple-Purpose Forest Management, " Forest Policy and Economics, 7, pp. 603-614.
• Kangas, J.; Store, R. (2003): "Internet and Teledemocracy in Participatory Planning of Natural Resources Management, " Landscape and Urban Planning, 62, pp. 89-101.
• Kaplan, R.; Kaplan, S.; Ryan, R.L. (1998): With People in Mind: Design and Manage-ment of Everyday Nature. Washington DC, WA: Island Press.
• Kouplevatskaya-Yunusova, I.; Buttoud, G. (2006): "Assessment of an Iterative Pro-cess: The Double Spiral of Re-Designing Participation, " Forest Policy and Economics, 8, pp. 529-541.
• Leskinen, L.A. (2004): "Purposes and Challenges of Public Participation in Regional and Local Forestry in Finland, " Forest Policy and Economics, 6, pp. 605-618.
• Marey Pérez, M.F. (2007): "Plan de Ordenación de Recursos Forestales: Distrito I Fe-rrol, " Jornada de Debate sobre PORF. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), Red Temática Selvired.
• Marey Pérez, M.F.; Aboal, J.; Bruña, X. (2007): Anexo técnico ao proxecto de convenio de colaboración entre a Consellería de Medio Rural e a Universidade de Santiago de Compostela para a elaboración dos Plans de Ordenación de Recursos Forestais (PORF) en Galiza. (Documento non publicado).
• Marey Pérez, M.F.; Rodríguez Vicente, V.; Crecente Maseda, R. (2007): "Perfil do propietario forestal individual en Galicia: obxectivos e prácticas de xestión no nordeste da Comunidade, " Revista Galega de Economía, 16 (1), pp. 47-70.
• Martin, A. (2002): "On Knowing what Trees to Plant: Local and Expert Perspectives in the Western Ghats of Karnataka, " Geoforum, 34, pp. 57-69.
• Martins, H.; Borges, J.G. (2007): "Addressing Collaborative Planning Methods and Tools in Forest Management, " Forest Ecology Management, 248, pp. 107-118.
• Mayer, P. (2004): "The MCPFE and COST E19, " en P. Glück e J. Voitleithner [ed.]: NFP Research: Its Retrospect and Outlook, pp. 183-194. Vienna: Institute of Forest Sector Po-licy and Economics.
• Mbatu, R.S. (2009): "Forest Policy Analysis Praxis: Modelling the Problem of Forest Loss in Cameroon, " Forest Policy and Economics, 11, pp. 26-33.
• McCool, S.F.; Guthrie, K. (2001): "Mapping the Dimensions of Successful Public Partic-ipation in Messy Natural Resources Management Situations, " Society and Natural Re-sources, 14, pp. 309-323.
• Mendoza, G.A.; Prabhu, R. (2005): "Combining Participatory Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Community-Based Forest Management, " Forest Ecology and Man-agement, 207, pp. 145-156.
• Mendoza, G.A.; Prabhu, R. (2006): "Participatory Modeling and Analysis for Sustainable Forest Management: Overview of Soft System Dynamics Models and Applications, " For-est Policy and Economics, 9, pp. 179-196.
• Nielsen, A.B.; Olsen, S.B.; Lundhede, T. (2007): "An Economic Valuation of the Recre-ational Benefits Associated with Nature-Based Forest Management Practices, " Landscape and Urban Planning, 80, pp. 63-71.
• Niemelä, J.; Young, J.; Alard, D.; Askasibar, M.; Henle, K.; Johnson, R.; Kurttila, M.; Larsson, T.; Matouch, S.; Nowicki, P.; Paiva, R.; Portoghesi, L.; Smulders, R.; Stevenson, A.; Tartes, U.; Watt, A. (2005): "Identifying, Managing and Monitoring Conflicts between Forest Biodiversity Conservation and Other Human Interests in Eu-rope, " Forest Policy and Economics, 7, pp. 877-890.
• Nijnik, M.; Zahvoyska, L.; Nijnik, A.; Ode, A. (2008): "Public Evaluation of Landscape Content and Change: Several Examples from Europe, " Land Use Policy, 26, pp. 77-86.
• Ojha, H.R.; Cameron J.; Kumar, C. (2009): "Deliberation or Symbolic Violence? The Governance of Community Forestry in Nepal, " Forest Policy and Economics, 11 (5), pp. 365-374.
• O'Neill, J. (2001): "Representing People, Representing Nature, Representing the World, " Environment and Planning. C, Government and Policy, 19 (4), pp. 483-500.
• Panagopoulos, T. (2009): "Linking Forestry, Sustainability and Aesthetics, " Ecological Economics, 68, pp. 2485-2489.
• Pelkonen, P.; Pitkänen, A.; Schmidt, P.; Oesten, G.; Piussi, P.; Rojas, E. [ed.] (1999): Forestry in Changing Societies in Europe. Silva Network.
• Penker, M. (2009): "Landscape Governance for or by the Local Population? A Property Rights Analysis in Austria, " Land Use Policy, 26, pp. 947-953.
• Prada Blanco, A.; Vázquez Rodríguez, M.X.; Soliño Millán, M. (2005): Beneficios y costes sociales en la conservación de la Red Natura 2000. Fundación Caixa Galicia, Cen-tro de Investigacion Económica y Financiera.
• Pretty, J.N. (1994): "Alternative Systems of Inquiry for Sustainable Agriculture, " IDS Bu-lletin, 25 (2), pp. 37-48.
• Primmer, E.; Kyllönen, S. (2006): "Goals for Public Participation Implied by Sustainable Development, and the Preparatory Process of the Finnish National Forest Programme, " Forestry Policy and Economics, 8, pp. 838-853.
• Purdon, M. (2003): "The Nature of Ecosystem Management: Postmodernism and Plurality in the Sustainable Management of the Boreal Forest, " Environmental Science & Policy, 6, pp. 377-388.
• Richard, T.; Burns, S. (1998): "Beyond 'Scoping'. Citizens and San Juan National Forest Managers, Learning Together, " Journal of Forestry, 96 (4), pp. 39-43.
• Rodríguez Vicente, V.; Marey Pérez, M.F. (2008): "Sistemas de apoio á propiedade privada forestal e a súa aplicación en Galicia, " Revista Galega de Economía, 17 (1), pp. 111-130.
• Scardina, A.V.; Mortimer, M.J.; Dudley, L. (2007): "Getting Past the who and how Many to the how and why in USDA Forest Service Public Involvement Processes, " Forest Policy and Economics, 9, pp. 883-902.
• Selman, P. (2004): "Community Participation in the Planning and Management of Cultural Landscapes, " Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47, pp. 365-395.
• Sewell, W.R.D.; O'Riordan, T. (1976): Natural Resources for a Democratic Society: Public Participation in Decision-Making. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
• Shannon, M. (1999): "Mooving from the Limits and Problems of Rational Planning to-ward a Collaborative and Participatory Planning Approach, " en P. Glück, G. Oesten, H. Schanz e K.R. Colz [ed.]: Formulation and Implementation of National Forest Pro-grammes, pp. 139-151. Joensuu: European Forest Institute.
• Sheppard, S.R.J.; Meitner, M. (2005): "Using Multi-Criteria Analysis and Visualisation for Sustainable Forest Management Planning with Stakeholder Groups, " Forest Ecology and Management, 207, pp. 171-187.
• Shindler, B.A.; Brunson, M.; Stankey, G.H. (2002): Social Acceptability of Forest Conditions and Management Practices: A Problem Analysis. (General Technical Report, 537). USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
• Shindler, B.; Neburka, J. (1997): "Public Participation in Forest Planning, " Journal of Forestry, (January), pp. 17-19.
• Sipilä, M.; Tyrväinen, L. (2005): "Evaluation of Collaborative Urban Forest Planning in Helsinki, Finland, " Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 4, pp. 1-12.
• Stenseke, M. (2009): "Local Participation in Cultural Landscape Maintenance: Lessons from Sweden, " Land Use Policy, 26, pp. 214-223.
• Stewart, J.M.P.; Sinclair, A.J. (2007): "Meaningful Public Participation in Environmen-tal Assessment: Perspectives from Canadian Participants, Proponents and Government, " Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 9 (2), pp. 161-183.
• Suárez de Vivero, J.; Rodríguez Mateos, J.C.; Florido del Corral, D. (2008): "The Paradox of Public Participation in Fisheries Governance. The Rising Number of Actors and the Devolution Process, " Marine Policy, 32, pp. 319-325.
• Sugimura, K.; Howard, T.E. (2008): "Incorporating Social Factors to Improve the Japa-nese Forest Zoning Process, " Forest Policy and Economics, 10, pp. 161-173.
• Swedeen, P. (2006): "Post-Normal Science in Practice: A Q Study of the Potential for Sus-tainable Forestry in Washington State, USA, " Ecological Economics, 57, pp. 190-208.
• Thompson, J.R.; Elmendorf, W.F.; McDonough, M.H.; Burban, L.L. (2005): "Partici-pation and Conflict: Lessons Learned from Community Forestry, " Journal of Forestry, 103 (4), pp. 174-178.
• Tilt, J.H.; Kearney, A.R.; Bradley, G. (2007): "Understanding Rural Character: Cogni-tive and Visual Perceptions, " Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, pp. 14-26.
• Tuler, S.; Webler, T. (1999): "Voices from the Forest: What Participants Expect of a Public Participation Process, " Society and Natural Resources, 12, pp. 437-453.
• Tyrväinen, L.; Gustavsson, R.; Konijnendijk, C.; Ode, A. (2006): "Visualization and Landscape Laboratories in Planning, Design and Management of Urban Woodlands, " Forest Policy and Economics, 8, pp. 811-823.
• Tyrväinen, L.; Silvennoinen, H.; Kolehmainen, O. (2003): "Ecological and Aesthetic Values in Urban Forest Management, " Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 1, pp. 135-149.
• Webler, T.; Kastenholz, H.; Renn, O. (1995): "Public Participation in Impact Assess-ment: A Social Learning Perspective, " Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, pp. 443-463.
• Weber, N.; Christophersen, T. (2002): "The Influence of Nongovernmental Organiza-tions on the Creation of Natura 2000 During the European Policy Process, " Forest Policy and Economics, 4, pp. 1-12.
• White, R.M.; Fischer, A.; Marshall, K.; Travis, J.M.J.; Webb, T.J.; Di Falco, S.; Redpath, S.M.; Van der Wal, R. (2009): "Developing an Integrated Conceptual Framework to Understand Biodiversity Conflicts, " Land Use Policy, 26, pp. 242-253.