La financiación de la investigación como motor del emprendimiento académicoanálisis de las patentes universitarias

  1. Rodeiro Pazos, David
  2. Fernández López, Sara
  3. Rodríguez Sandiás, Alfonso
  4. Otero González, Luis
Revista:
Revista de educación

ISSN: 0034-8082

Ano de publicación: 2012

Número: 357

Páxinas: 203-230

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Revista de educación

Referencias bibliográficas

  • ACOSTA, M. Y CORONADO, D. (2002). Las relaciones ciencia-tecnología en España. Evidencias a partir de las citas científicas en patentes. Economía Industrial, 356 (4), 27-46.
  • ACOSTA, M., CORONADO, D., LEÓN, M. D. Y MARÍN, M. R. (2004). Determinantes de la producción de patentes en la Universidad. Evidencia a partir de los grupos de investigación andaluces. Actas del Congreso de la Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, Barcelona.
  • AGRAWAL, A. & HENDERSON, R. (2002). Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48 (1), 44-60.
  • AZAGRA, J. (2001).Determinantes de las patentes universitarias:el caso de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Working Paper, EC 2001-03, IVIE, Valencia.
  • BADELT, C. (2004). Opening Session, Vienna University, School of Economics and Business Administration, Universidad de Viena,Viena, 21 enero.
  • BALDINI, N. (2008). Negative Effects of University Patenting: Myths and Grounded Evidence. Scientometrics, 75 (2), 289-311.
  • BALDINI, N., GRIMALDI, R. & SOBRERO, M. (2006). Institutional Changes and the Commercialization of Academic Knowledge: A Study of Italian Universities’ Patenting Activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35 (4), 518-532.
  • BLUNDELL, R., GRIFFITH, R. & VAN REENEN, J. (1995). Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological Innovation. Economic Journal, 105, 333-344.
  • CARAYOL, N. (2004). Academic Incentives and Research Organization for Patenting at a Large French University. Third EPIP Workshop, Pisa.
  • CLARK, B. R. (1998). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Nueva York: IAU Press.
  • COUPÉ, T. (2003). Science Is Golden:Academic R&D and University Patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28 (1), 31-46.
  • DECLERCQ, G.V. (1981). A Third Look at the Two Cultures: The New Economic Responsibility of the University. International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, 5 (2), 117-122.
  • DEGROOF, J. J. & ROBERTS, E. B. (2004). Overcoming Weak Entrepreneurial Infrastructures for Academic Spin-Off Ventures. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (3/4), 327-352.
  • DI GREGORIO, D. & SHANE, S. (2003). Why Do some Universities Generate more Start-ups than Others? Research Policy, 32 (2), 209-227.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H. (2004). The Evolution of the Entrepreneurial University. International Journal Technology and Globalisation, 1 (1), 64-77.
  • ETZKOWITZ, H., ANDREW, W., CHRISTIANE, G. ET ÁL. (2000). The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm, Research Policy, 29 (2), 313-330.
  • FERNÁNDEZ, S., OTERO, L., RODEIRO, D. ET ÁL. (2009). Determinantes de la capacidad de las universidades para desarrollar patentes. Revista de la Educación Superior, 35 (149), 7-30.
  • FOLTZ, J., BARHAM, B. & KIM, K. (2000). Universities and Agricultural Biotechnology Patent Production. Agribusiness, 16 (1), 82-95.
  • HAYES, D. & WYNYARD, R. (Eds.). (2002). The McDonaldization of Higher Education. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
  • HEIRMAN,A. & CLARYSSE, B. (2004). How and Why Do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective. Journal of Technology Transfer, 29 (3/4), 247-268.
  • HENDERSON, R., JAFFE, A. B. & TRAJTENBERG, M. (1998). Universities As a Source of Commercial Technology: Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 1965-1988. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80 (1), 119-128.
  • JENSEN, R., THURSBY, J. G. & THURSBY, M. C. (2003). Disclosure and Licensing of University Inventions:‘The Best We Can Do with the S**t We Get to Work with’. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21 (9), 1271-1300.
  • LANDRY, R., RHERRAD, I. & AMARA, N. (2005). The Determinants of University Spin-offs: Evidence from Canadian Universities. The 5th Triple Helix Conference, Turín.
  • LERNER, J. (2005). The University and the Start-up: Lessons from the Past Two Decades, Journal of Technology Transfer, 30 (1/2), 49-56.
  • LOCKETT, A. & WRIGHT, M. (2005). Resources, Capabilities, Risk Capital and the Creation of University Spin-out Companies. Research Policy, 34 (7), 1043-1057.
  • LOUIS, K. S., BLUMENTHAL, D., GLUCK, M. ET ÁL. (1989). Entrepreneurs in Academe: an Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists. Administrative Science Quaterly, 34 (1), 110-131.
  • MILOT, P. (2005). La commercialisation des résultats de la recherche universitaire: une revue de la litteráture. Montreal: Centre Interuniversitaire de Recherche sur le Science et la Technologie.
  • MIYATA, Y. (2000). An Empirical Analysis of Innovative Activity of Universities in the United States. Technovation, 20 (8), 413-425.
  • MOWERY, D. C. & ZIEDONIS, A. A. (2002). Academic Patent Quality Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy, 31 (3), 399-418.
  • NDONZUAZU, F., PIRNAY, F. & SURLEMONT, B. (2002). A Stage Model of Academic Spin-off Creation. Technovation, 22 (5), 281-289.
  • OCDE. (2003). Turning Science into Business. Patenting and Licensing at Public Research Organisations. París.
  • O’SHEA, R. P., ALLEN, T. J., CHEVALIER, A. ET ÁL. (2005). Entrepreneurial Orientation, Technology Transfer and Spin-off Performance of U.S. Universities. Research Policy, 34 (7), 994-1009.
  • OWEN-SMITH, J. & POWELL,W. (2003).The Expanding Role of University Patenting in the Life Sciences:Assessing the Importance of Experience and Connectivity. Research Policy, 32 (9), 1695-1711.
  • PENROSE, E.T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Nueva York:Wiley.
  • POWERS, J. & MCDOUGALL, P. (2005). University Start-up Formation and Technology Licensing with Firms that Go Public: a Resource Based View of Academic Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20 (3), 291-311. RED OTRI DE UNIVERSIDADES (varios años). Informe RedOTRI. Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas, Madrid, RedOTRI de universidades, CRUE.
  • RASMUSSEN, E. & BORCH, O. J. (2004). University Resources Facilitating Strategic Entrepreneurship. Paper for the Second Bi-annual European Summer University, Universidad de Twente, septiembre.
  • ROBERTS,E.B.& MALONE,D.E.(1996).Policies and Structures for Spinning Off New Companies from Research and Development Organizations, R & D Management, 26 (1), 17-48.
  • RODEIRO, D., FERNÁNDEZ, S., OTERO, L. ET ÁL. (2008). La creación de empresas en el ámbito universitario:una aplicación de la teoría de los recursos.Cuadernos de gestión,8 (2),11-28.
  • SHANE, S. (2001). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47 (9), 1173-1190.
  • SIEGEL, D. S., WALDMAN, D., ATWATER, L. ET ÁL. (2003). Commercial Knowledge Transfers from Universities to Firms: Improving the Effectiveness of University-Industry Collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14 (1), 111-133. SLAUGHTER, S. & LESLIE, L. (1997). Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • TRAJTENBERG, M., HENDERSON, R. & JAFFE, A. (1997). University versus Corporate Patents: A Window on the Basicness of Inventions. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5, 19-50.
  • VALLS, J. Y CONDOM, P. (2003). La nueva universidad: la universidad emprendedora. Iniciativa emprendedora, 41.
  • WERNERFELT, B. (1995).The Resource-based View of the Firm: Ten Years After. Strategic Management Journal. 16 (3), 171-174.
  • ZEMSKY, R., WEGNER, G. R. & MASSY, W. F. (2005). Remaking the American University: Market-Smart and Mission Centered. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  • ZUCKER, L., DARBY, M. & BREWER, M. (1998). Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of US Biotechnology Enterprises. American Economic Review, 88 (1), 290-306.