Interdisciplinariedad en la construcción del conocimiento¿más allá de Bolonia?

Referencias bibliográficas

• AlisedA, A. (2004). Logics in scientific discovery. Foundations of Science, 9, 339-363.
• BECHER, t. (2001). Tribus y territorios académicos. Barcelona: Gedisa. (Orig. 1993).
• BENSON, t. c. (1982). Five arguments against interdisciplinry studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 1, 38-48.
• BOIX-mAsillA, V. y duRAising, e. d. (2007). Targeted assessment of student’s interdisciplinary work: an emprirically grounded framework proponed. Journal of Higher Education, 78, 215-237.
• BOURdieu, P. (1997). Razones prácticas. Barcelona: Anagrama. (Orig. 1994).
• BOURdieu, P. (2003). El oficio de científico. Barcelona: Anagrama. (Orig. 2001).
• BRun, g.; doguoglu, u. y Kuenzle, d. (eds.) (2008). Epistemology and emotions. Aldershot: Ashgate.
• Bunge, m. (1999). Las ciencias sociales en discusión. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana. (Orig. 1998).
• Bunge, m. (2002). Crisis y reconstrucción de la filosofía. Barcelona: Gedisa. (Orig. 2001).
• Bunge, m. (2003). Emergencia y convergencia. Barcelona: Gedisa. (Orig. 2001).
• ChAndRAmohAn, b. y FAllows, s. (eds.) (2009). Interdisciplinary learning and teaching in higher education. new York: Routledge.
• CoRnish, F., gillesPie, A., tAniA zittoun, t. y bAucAl, A. (eds.) (2007). Collaborative research and the culture of science (Special issue). Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41 (2).
• Dewey, J. (1989). Cómo pensamos. Barcelona: Paidós. (Orig. 1933).
• FRodemAn, R. y mitchAm, c. (2007). new directions in interdisciplinairty: broad, deep and critical. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 27, 506-514.
• Hennessey, b. A. y AmAbile, t. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598.
• HIRsch-hAdoRn, g.; hoFFmAnn-Riem, h.; bibeR-Klemm, s.; gRossenbAcheR-mAnsuy, w.; Joye, d.; Pohl, c.; wiesmAnn, u. y zemP, e. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. new York: Springer.
• Holley, K. A. (2009). Understanding interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
• Huutoniemi, K.; Klein, J. t.; bRunn, h. y huKKinen, J. (2010). Analyzing interdisciplinary: typology and indicators. Research Policy, 39, 79-88.
• JAcobs, J. A. y FRicKel, s. (2009). Interdisciplinary: A critical assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 43-65.
• Klein, J. t. (1990). Interdisciplinarity. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
• Klein, J. t. (1996). Crossing boundaries. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
• Klein, J. t. (1999). Mapping interdisciplinary studies.Washington: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
• Klein, J. t. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 515-526.
• Klein, J. t. (2008). Evaluating of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research. A literatura review. American Journal of Medicine, 35 (2S), S116-S123.
• KRuglAnsKi, A. w.; PieRRo, A.; mAnnetti, l. y de gRAdA, e. (2006). Groups as epistemic providers: need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Psychological Review, 113, 84-100.
• LAttucA, l. R. (2001). Creating interdisciplinary. nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
• LAttucA, l. R. (2002). Learning interdisciplinarity: sociocultural perspectivas on academia work. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 711-739.
• Mâsse, l. c.; moseR, R. P.; stoKols, d.; tAyloR, b. K.; mARcus, s. e.; moRgAn, g. d.; mAy, K. l.; cRoyle, R. t. y tRochim, w. m. (2008). Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35 (2S), S151-S160.
• MAthiesen, K. (2007). Introduction to special issue of Social Epistemology on “Collective knowledge and collective knowers” (Special issue). Social Epistemology, 21 (3).
• MeRton, R. K. (1964). Teoría y estructura sociales. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica. (Orig. 1949).
• MitchAm, c.; FRodemAn, R. y Klein, J. t. (Eds.) (2010). Oxford handbook of interdisciplinary. new York: Oxford University Press.
• MitRoFF, i. i. (1974). Integrating the philosophy and the social psychology of science or a plague on two houses divided. Philosophy and the Social Psychology of Science, 529-548.
• NAsh, J. m. (2008). Transdisciplinary training. Key components and prerrequisites for success. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35 (2S), S133-S140.
• Newell, w. h. (2001). A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in Integrative Studies, 19, 1-25.
• NiKitinA, s. (2005). Pathways of interdisciplinary cognition. Cognition and Instruction, 23, 389-425.
• PiAget, J. (1976). Problemas generales de la investigación interdisciplinaria y mecanismos comunes. En Piaget, J.; Lazarsfeld, P. F.; Mackenzie, W. J. M. et al. (Eds.), Tendencias de la investigación en las ciencias sociales. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 199-282. (Orig. 1970).
• PoPPeR, K. (1972). Conjeturas y refutaciones. Barcelona: Paidós. (Orig. 1963).
• PRochAsKA, J. o.; wRight, J. A. y VeliceR, w. F. (2008). Evaluating theores of health behavior change: a hierarchy of criteria applied to the transtheoretical model. Applied Psychology: An Interntional Review, 57, 561-588.
• RePKo, A. (2008). Interdisciplinary research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
• SPelt, e. J.h.; biemAns, h. J. A.; tobi, h.; luning, P. A. y muldeR, m. (2009). Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: a systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 365-378.
• StoKols, d.; FuquA, J.; gRess, J.; hARVey, R.; PhilliPs, K.; bAezcondegARbAnAti, l.; ungeR, J.; PAlmeR, P.; clARK, m. A.; colby, s. m.; moRgAn, g. y tRochim, w. (2003). Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotina and Tobacco Research, 5, S21-S39.
• StoKols, d.; hAll, K. J.; tAyloR, b. K. y moseR, R. P. (2008). The science of team science. Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35 (2S), S77-S89.
• StoKols, d.; misRA, s.; moseR, R. P.; mAy, K. J. y tAyloR, b. K. (2008). The ecology of team science. Understanding contextual influences on transdisciplinary collaboration. American journal of Preventive Medicine, 35 (2S), S96-S115.
• SzostAK, R. (2003). A schema for unifying human science. Selinsgrove: Susquehanna University Press.
• ThomPson, J. l. (2009). Building collective communication competente in interdisciplinary research teams. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 37, 278-297.
• TwAle, d. J.; schAlleR, m. A.; hunley, s. A. y PolAnsKi, P.J. (2002). Creating collaborative community in multidisciplinary settings. Innovative Higher Education, 27, 113-128.
• VAn FRAAseen, b. c. (2008). Scientific representation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• WeingARt, P. y stehR, n. (eds.) (2000). Practicing interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
• Wylie, A. (ed.) (2006). Epistemic diversity and disent, Part 1 (Special issue). Episteme, 3 (1-2).
• ZAbAlzA, m. A. (2008). El Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior: innovación en la enseñanza universitaria. Innovación Educativa, 18, 69-95.
• Zhou, J. y shAlley, c. e. (eds.) (2008). Handbook of organizational creativity. new York: Erlbaum.