Construction and "worldmaking"the significance of Nelson Goodman's pluralism

  1. Donato Rodríguez, Xavier de
Revista:
Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

ISSN: 0495-4548

Ano de publicación: 2009

Volume: 24

Número: 65

Páxinas: 213-225

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Theoria: an international journal for theory, history and foundations of science

Resumo

In the present paper, I try to defend a coherent interpretation of Goodman�s relativism by responding to the main objections of the critics. I also discuss the significance of his pluralism by relating it to the notion of construction. This will show the relevance of Goodman�s philosophy for the present days.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Bennigson, T., 1999. Is Relativism really self-refuting. Philosophical Studies 94: 3, pp. 211-236.
  • Boghossian, P., 2006. Fear of knowledge. Against Relativism and Constructivism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Cox, D., 2003. Goodman and Putnam on the Making of Worlds, Erkenntnis 58: 1, pp. 33-46.
  • Dupré, J., 1993. The Disorder of Things. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  • Elgin, C.Z., 2009. Construction and Cognition.
  • Goodman, N., 1951. The Structure of Appearance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Goodman, N., 1954. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. London: Athlone Press.
  • Goodman, N., 1963. The Significance of Der logische Aufbau der Welt. In P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, pp. 545-558.
  • Goodman, N., 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.
  • Goodman, N., 1984. Of Mind and Other Matters. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
  • Goodman, N. and C. Z. Elgin. 1988. Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences. London: Routledge.
  • Haase, M., 2005. Was ist eigentlich eine Weltversion?. In J. Steinbrenner, O. Scholz and G. Ernst (eds.), Symbole, Systeme, Welten, Studien zur Philosophie Nelson Goodmans. Heidelberg: Synchron, pp. 111-139.
  • Harris, J.F., 1992. Against Relativism. A Philosophical Defense of Method. La Salle: Open Court.
  • Hempel, C.G., 1996. Comments on Goodman's Ways of Worldmaking. In McCormick (ed.), pp. 125-131.
  • Johnston, M., 1993. Objectivity Refigured: Pragmatism Without Verificationism. In J. Haldane and C. Wright (eds.), Reality, Representation and Projection. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 85-130.
  • Küng, G., 1993. Ontology and the Construction of Systems. Synthese 95: 1, pp. 29-53.
  • Künne, W., 1993. Truth, Rightness, and Permanent Acceptability. Synthese 95: 1, pp. 107-117.
  • Lynch, M., 1998. Truth in Conflict: an Essay in Pluralism and Objectivity. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  • Lynch, M., 2009. Truth as One and Many. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McCormick, P.J., ed., 1996. Starmaking. Realism, Anti-Realism and Irrealism. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
  • Norris, Ch., 2000. Quantum Theory and the Flight from Realism. Philosophical Responses to Quantum Mechanics. London: Routledge.
  • Putnam, H., 1990. The Way the World Is. In H. Putnam. Realism with a Human Face. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 261-267.
  • Putnam, H., 1996. Irrealism and Deconstruction. In McCormick (ed.), pp. 179-200.
  • Rossberg, M. and D. Cohnitz. 2006. Nelson Goodman. Chesham: Acumen.
  • Scheffler, I., 1996. The Wonderful Worlds of Goodman. In McCormick (ed.), pp. 133-141.
  • Scheffler, I., 2000. A Plea for Plurealism. Erkenntnis 52, pp. 161-173.
  • Schwartz, R., 2000. Starting from Scratch: Making Worlds. Erkenntnis 52, pp. 151-159.
  • Shottenkirk, D., 2009. Nominalism and Its Aftermath: The Philosophy of Nelson Goodman. Berlin: Springer.
  • Siegel, H., 1984. Goodmanian Relativism. The Monist 67: 3, pp. 359-375;
  • Siegel, H., 1987. Relativism Refuted. Dordrecht: Reidel.