The portacaval sham operation in rats affects acquisition but not memory of an active avoidance task

  1. López Álvarez, Laudino 1
  2. Méndez López, Marta 1
  3. Méndez López, Magdalena
  4. Aller Reyero, María Angeles
  5. Arias Pérez, Jaime
  6. Díaz Fernández, Fernando
  7. Arias Pérez, Jorge Luis 1
  1. 1 Universidad de Oviedo
    info

    Universidad de Oviedo

    Oviedo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/006gksa02

Journal:
Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

ISSN: 2171-2069

Year of publication: 2010

Volume: 1

Issue: 1

Pages: 81-99

Type: Article

More publications in: Revista iberoamericana de psicología y salud

Abstract

Hepatic encephalopathy is one of the most important diseases and is the focus of investigation by many research groups. One of the most frequently used models is the portocaval shunt. This requires a surgically intervened group and also a sham operated group as control. Our objective was to examine whether the sham operation had physiological or behavioural consequences for the animals. Two groups of rats were studied: rats that had undergone a sham operation consisting in a laparotomy followed by clamping of the portal vein and inferior vena cava for 15 min; and an unoperated control group. The animals were then submitted to behavioural tests and plasma testosterone and corticosterone levels were determined. The sham-operated rats behaved slightly differently to the control rats in the open field. They tended to walk more in the central area. In the Morris pool, they learnt the task one day later than the control group. In the associative learning test, the sham operation prevented rats from being able to learn the task. However, the sham operation did not interfere with the rats remembering a previously learnt task. The sham group also presented higher levels of plasma corticosterone than controls. It seems necessary to reconsider what would constitute the most appropriate control group for portacaval shunt.

Bibliographic References

  • Abraldes, J.G., Pasarín, M., & García-Pagán, J.C. (2006). Animal models of portal hypertension. World Journal of Gastroeneterology, 12, 6577-6584.
  • Benoist, S., Sarkis, R., Baudrimont, M., Delelo, R., Robert, A., Vaubourdolle, M., Balladur, P., Calmus, Y., Capeau, J., & Nordlinger, B. (2000). A reversible model of acute hepatic failure by temporary hepatic ischemia in the pig. The Journal of Surgical Research, 88, 63-69.
  • Bhatnagar, A., & Majumdar, S. (2003). Animal models of hepatic encephalopathy. Indian Journal of Gastroenterology, 22(Suppl 2), S33-36.
  • Blei, A.T., & Córdoba, J. (2001). Hepatic encephalopathy. The American Journal of Gastroeneterology, 96, 1968-1976.
  • Blei, A.T., Omary, R., & Butterworth, R.F. (1992). Animal models of hepatic encephalopathies. In A. Bouton, B. Baker & R.F. Butterworth (Eds.), Animal models of neurological disease II. Neuromethod (Volume 2, pp.183-222). New Jersey: The Humana Press Clifton.
  • Brush, F.R. (2003). The Syracuse strains, selectively bred for differences in active avoidance learning, may be models of genetic differences in trait and state anxiety. Stress, 6, 77-85.
  • Butterworth, R.F. (2003). Pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy: New insights from neuroimaging and molecular studies. Journal of Hepatology, 39, 278- 285.
  • Chamuleau, R.A. (1996). Animal models of hepatic encephalopathy. Seminars in Liver Disease, 16, 265–270.
  • Clincke, G.H.C., & Werbrouck, L. (1993). Two-way active avoidance. In A. Sahgal (Ed.), Behavioural neuroscience (Volume I, pp. 71-79). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • De Boer, S.F., & Van der Gugten, J. (1987). Daily variations in plasma noradrenaline, adrenaline and corticosterone concentrations in rats. Physiology & Behavior, 40, 323-328.
  • Diéguez, B., Aller, M.A., Nava, M.P., Palma, M.D., Arias, J.L., Lopez, L., & Arias, J. (2002). Chronic portal hypertension in the rat by triple-portal stenosing ligation. Journal of Investigative Surgery, 15, 329-336.
  • Ferenci, P., Lockwood, A., Mullen, K., Tarter, R., Weissenborn, K., & Blei, A.T. (2002). Hepatic encephalopathy. Definition, nomenclature, diagnosis, and quantification. Final report of the Working Party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna, 1998. Hepatology, 35, 716–721.
  • Filipponi, F., Fabbri, L.P., Marsili, M., Falcini, F., Benassai, C., Nucera, M., & Romagnoli, P. (2001). A new surgical model of acute liver failure in the pig: Experimental procedure and analysis of liver injury. European Surgical Research, 23, 58-64.
  • Filipponi, F., & Mosca, F. (2001). Animal models of fulminate hepatic failure: need to test liver support devices. Digestive and Liver Disease, 33, 607-613.
  • Hall, N.J., Smith, V.V., Harding, B., Pierro, A., & Eaton, S. (2005). Intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury does not lead to acute central nervous system damage. The Journal of Surgical Research, 129, 288-291.
  • Hazell, A.S., & Butterworth, R.F. (1999). Hepatic encephalopathy: An update of pathophysiologic mechanisms. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 222, 99-112.
  • Jover, R., Madaria, E., Felipo, V., Rodrigo, R., Candela, A., & Compan, A. (2005). Animal models in the study of episodic hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis. Metabolic Brain Disease, 20, 399-408.
  • Kelley, A.E. (1993). Locomotor activity and exploration. In A. Sahgal (Ed.), Behavioural neuroscience (Volume II, pp. 1-21). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kountouras, J., Billing, B.H., & Scheuer, P.J. (1984). Prolonged bile duct obstruction: A new experimental model for cirrhosis in the rat. British Journal of Experimental Pathology, 65, 305-311.
  • Laleman, W., Elst, I.V., Zeegers, M., Servaes, R., Libbrecht, L., Roskams, T., Fevery, J., & Nevens, F. (2006). A stable model of cirrhotic portal hypertension in the rat: thioacetamide revisited. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 36, 242–249.
  • Levine, S. (1971). Stress and behaviour. Scientific American, 224, 26-31.
  • Li, X., Benjamin, I.S., & Alexander, B. (2002). Reproducible production of thioacetamide-induced macronodular cirrhosis in the rat with no mortality. Journal of Hepatology, 36, 488-493.
  • López, L., Begega, A., Burgos, P., Santín, L.J., Lorente, A., Arias, J., & Arias, J.L. (1997). Portacaval shunt control animals: Physiological consequences derived from the sham operation. Laboratory Animals, 31, 225-230.
  • McEwen, B.S., & Sapolsky, R.M. Stress and cognitive function. (1995). Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 5, 205–216.
  • Montagnese, S., Amodio, P., & Morgan, M.Y. (2004). Methods for diagnosing hepatic encephalopathy in patiens with cirrhosis: A multidimensional approach. Metabolic Brain Disease, 19, 281-312.
  • Morris, R.G.M. (1984). Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 11, 47-60.
  • Morris, R.G.M. (1981). Spatial localization does not require the presence of local cues. Learning and Motivation, 12, 239-260.
  • Ong, J.P., & Mullen, K.D. (2001). Hepatic encephalopathy. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 13, 325-334
  • Quero, J.C., & Herrerías, J.M. (2006). Diagnostic methods in hepatic encephalopathy. Clinica Chimica Acta, 365, 1-8.
  • Stewart, C.A., & Morris, R.G.M. (1993). The Watermaze. In A. Sahgal (Ed.), Behavioural neuroscience (Volume I, pp. 107-122). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Terblanche, J., & Hickman, R. (1991). Animal models of fulminant hepatic failure. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 36, 770-774.
  • Weiss, E., & Greenberg, G. (1998). Open-field procedures. In G. Greenberg & M.M. Haraway (Eds.), Comparative psychology: A handbook (pp. 357-263). New York: Garland.
  • Yehuda, R., & Antelman, S.M. (1993). Criteria for rationally evaluating animal of posttraumatic stress disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 33, 479-486.
  • Yehuda, R., Southwick, S., Nussbaum, G., Wahby, V., Giller, E., & Mason, J. (1990). Low urinary cortisol excretion in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 178, 366-369.