A non-cooperative approach to bankruptcy problems

Bibliographische Referenzen

• Aumann R (1959) Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Tucker AW, Luce RD (Eds.) Contributions to the theory of games IV. Princeton University Press, Princeton
• Chun Y (1989) A noncooperative justification for the Egalitaria surplus sharing. Math Soc Sci 17:245-261
• Corchón LC, Herrero C (2004) A decent proposal. Span Econ Rev 6:107-125
• Dagan N, Serrano R, Volij O (1997) A noncooperative view of consistent bankruptcy rules. Games Econ Behav 18:55-72
• Dagan N, Serrano R, Volij O (1999) Feasible implementation of taxation methods. Rev Econ Des 4:57-72
• de Frutos MA (1999) Coalitional manipulation in a bankruptcy problem. Rev Econ Des 4:255-272
• Herrero C (2003) Equal awards versus equal losses: duality in bankruptcy. In: Sertel MR, Koray S (eds.) Adv Econ Des. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
• Herrero C, Moreno-Ternero J, Ponti O (2003) An experiment of bankruptcy. Ivie Working paper AD 2003-03
• Ju B-G (2003) Manipulation via merging and splitting in claims problems. Rev Econ Des 8:205-215
• Moreno-Ternero JD (2004) Bankruptcy rules and coalitional manipulation. Int Game Theory Rev (in press)
• Moulin H (2002) Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing. In: Arrow K, Sen A, Suzumura K (eds.) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam
• O'Neill B (1982) A problem of rights arbitration from the Talmud. Math Soc Sci 2:345-371
• Serrano R (1995) Strategic bargaining, surplus sharing problems and the nucleolus. J Math Econ 24:319-329
• Sonn S (1992) Sequential bargaining for bankruptcy problems. Mimeo
• Thomson W (2003) Axiomatic and game theoretic analysis of bankruptcy and taxation problems. Math Soc Sci 45:249-297