La Entrevista Conductual Estructurada y el Desempeño Laboral en la Administración Pública EspañolaPropiedades psicométricas y reacciones de justicia

  1. Salgado Velo, Jesús Fernando
  2. Gorriti Bontigui, Mikel
  3. Moscoso Ruibal, Silvia
Journal:
Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

ISSN: 1576-5962

Year of publication: 2007

Issue Title: Avances Europeos en la Investigación del Desempeño Ocupacional y la Selección de Personal

Volume: 23

Issue: 1

Pages: 39-56

Type: Article

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

More publications in: Revista de psicología del trabajo y de las organizaciones = Journal of work and organizational psychology

Abstract

This paper reports on the results of two studies on the use of a panel structured behavioural interview (SBI) for promoting managers in the Spanish Public Administration. The first study describes the SBI psychometric properties (inter-rater reliability and criterion validity). The second study shows the fairness reactions of applicants, interviewers, and supervisors to the use of the SBI. The results support the use of this assessment tool for personnel decision making in the public administration.

Bibliographic References

  • Borman, W.C. y Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt, y W.C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Borman, W.C., Penner, L.A., Allen, T.D. y Motowidlo, S.J. (2001). Personality predictors of citizienship performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 52-69.
  • Conway, J.M., Jako, R.A. y Goodman, D.F. (1995). A meta-analysis of inter-rater and internal consistency reliability of selection interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 565-579.
  • Flanagan, J.C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
  • Guilford, J.P. y Fruchter, B. (1978). Fundamental of statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw.
  • Hotteling, H. (1940). The selection variables for use in the prediction, with some comments on the general problem of nuisance parameters. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 271-283.
  • Huffcutt, A. I. y Arthur,W. Jr. (1994). Hunter and Hunter (1984) revisited: interview validity for entry-level jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184–190.
  • Hunter, J.E.y Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative predictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 72-98.
  • Janz, T. (1982). Initial comparisons of patterned behavior description interviews versus unstructured interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 577-580.
  • Latham, G.P. (1989). The reliability, validity and practicality of the situational interview. En R.W. Eder y G.R. Ferris (Eds.). The Employment interview: Theory, research and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • McDaniel, M.A., Whetzel, D.L., Schmidt, F.L. y Maurer, S. (1994). The validity of employment interview: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599- 617.
  • Motowidlo, S.J., Carter, G.W., Dunnette, M.D., Tippins, N., Werner, S., Burnett, J.R. y Vaughan, J. (1992). Studies of structured behavioral interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 571-588.
  • Penney, L.M y Borman, W. C. (2005). The prediction of contextual performance. In A. Evers, A. Anderson y O. Voskuijl (Eds). Handbook of personnel selection (pp 376-396). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Ryan, A. M., McFarland, L., Baron, H. y Page, R. (1999). An international look at selection practices: nation and culture as explanations for variability in practice. Personnel Psychology, 52, 359–391.
  • Salgado, J.F. (1999). Personnel Selection Methods. In C.L. Cooper and I.T. Robertson (Eds.). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Vol. 12. (pp 1-53). London, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Salgado, J.F. y Anderson, N. (2003). Validity generalization of GMA tests across countries in the European Community. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 1-17.
  • Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., y de Fruyt, F. (2003a). International Validity Generalization of GMA and Cognitive Abilities as Predictors of Work Behaviors. Personnel Psychology,
  • Salgado, J.F., Anderson, N., Moscoso, S., Bertua, C., de Fruyt, F. y Rolland, J.P. (2003b). Criterion validity of General Mental Ability measures for different occupations in the European Community. Journal of Applied Psychology.
  • Salgado, J.F. y Moscoso, S. (1995). Validez de las entrevistas conductuales estructuradas. Psicología del Trabajo y las Organizaciones, 11, 9-24.
  • Salgado, J.F. y Moscoso, S. (2005). Entrevista conductual estructurada de selección de personal. Teoría, práctica y rentabilidad. 2ª edición. Madrid: Pirámide.
  • Salgado, J.F. y Moscoso, S. (2002). Comprehensive meta-analysis of the construct validity of the selection interview. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 11, 299-324.
  • Salgado, J.F., Moscoso, S. y Gorriti M. (2004). Investigaciones sobre la Entrevista Conductual Estructurada (ECE) en la Selección de Personal en la Administración General del País Vasco: Meta-análisis de la Fiabilidad. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 20, 107-139.
  • Salgado, J.F., Moscoso, S. y Lado, M. (2005). Reclutamiento y Selección. En Bonache, J. y Cabrera, A. (directores ). Dirección de personas. Evidencias y perspectivas para el siglo XXI. Financial Times-Prentice Hall.
  • Salgado, J.F., Viswesvaran, C. y Ones, D.S. (2001). Predictors used for personnel selection: an overview of construct, methods and technichs. En N. Anderson, D.S. Ones, H.K. Sinangil y C. Viswesvaran (Eds.). Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology. Vol 1 (pp 165-199). Londres: Sage
  • Schmidt, F.L. y Hunter, J.E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.
  • Schüler, H. (1989). Construct validity of a multimodal employment interview. En Fallon, B.J., Pfister, H.P. y Brebner, J. (Eds.). Advances in industrial and organizational psychology. New York: North Holland.
  • Schüler, H. y Funke, U. (1989). The interview as a multimodal procedure. En E.W. Eder y G.R. Ferris (Eds.). The Employment interview: Theory, research and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Viswesvaran, C., Ones, D.S., Schmidt, F.L.. (1996) Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 557-574.
Data source: Dialnet