Efecto de la excentricidad en tareas de búsqueda visual que difieren en las demandas atencionales

  1. Pardavila, M.
  2. Ponte Fernández, Dolores
  3. Sampedro Vizcaya, María José
Revista:
Psicothema

ISSN: 0214-9915

Ano de publicación: 2004

Volume: 16

Número: 4

Páxinas: 563-569

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Psicothema

Resumo

The eccentricity effect on visual search tasks that differ on attentional demand: Evidence in favor of attentional hypothesis. It seems intuitively clear and it has been experimentally proven that in visual search task when target appear in the fixation point it is detected and located better than when such element occupy more peripheral locations. Initially these effects were explained as a result of the decrement of the spatial resolution and sensitivity that happens in the retinal periphery. Nevertheless, they have appeared new data that indicate that these effects represent a foveal bias in the allocation of attention. Our study explores the role that eccentricity has in two different tasks of visual search (parallel and serial). The results that we have obtained support the attentional hypothesis. They show how the effects produced by this variable are directly related to the level of difficulty of the task: the more attentional resources needed the greater the effect produced by the localization in which the target is found

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Albert, M.L. (1973). A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology, 23(6), 658-664.
  • Carrasco, M. y Chang, I. (1995). The interaction of objective and subjective organizations in a localization task. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1.134-1.150.
  • Carrasco, M., Evert, D.L., Chang, I. y Katz, S.M. (1995). The eccentricity effect: Target eccentricity affects performance on conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 1.241-1.261.
  • Carrasco, M. y Frieder, K.S. (1997). Cortical magnification neutralizes the eccentricity effect in visual search. Vision Research, 37, 63-82.
  • Carrasco, M., McLean, T.L., Kazt, S.M. y Frieder, K.S. (1998). Features asymmetries in visual search: Effects display duration, target eccentricity, orientation, and spatial frequency. Vision Research, 38, 347-374.
  • Carrasco, M., Ponte, D., Rechea, C. y Sampedro, M.J. (1998). «Transient structures» the effects of practice and distractor grouping on within-dimension conjunction searches. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1.243-1.258.
  • Cole, B.L. y Hughes, P.K. (1984). A field trial of attention and search conspicuity. Human Factors, 26, 299-313.
  • Cudeiro, J. y Acuña, C. (1998). Fisiología de la Visión I. En Delgado, Ferrús, Mora y Rubia (Eds.), Manual de Neurociencia (Capítulo 21, pp. 541-578). Madrid: Síntesis.
  • DeValois, R.L. y DeValois, K.K. (1988). Spatial Vision. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Efron, R., Yund, E.W. y Nichols, D.R. (1990). Detectability as a function of target localization: Effects of spatial configuration. Brain and Cognition, 12, 102-116.
  • Gainotti, G., Messerli, P. y Tissot, R. (1972). Qualitative analysis of unilateral spatial neglect in relation to laterality of cerebral lesions. Journal of Neurology and Neurosurgery Psychiatry, 35, 545-550.
  • Geisler, W.S. y Chou, K.L. (1995). Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex task: Visual search. Psychological Review, 102, 356-378.
  • Ponte, D., Rechea, C. y Sampedro, M.J. (1995). Efecto de la homogeneidad y la organización de las exposiciones en una tarea de búsqueda visual con objetivos múltiples. Cognitiva, 7, 131-148.
  • Ponte, D. y Sampedro, M.J. (1997). Guía de la atención hacia un elemento definido por una conjunción intradimensión. Psicothema, 9, 377-382.
  • Previc, F.H. (1996). Attentional and oculomotor influences on visual field anisotropies in visual search performance. Visual Cognition, 3, 277-301.
  • Saarinen, J. (1993). Shifts in visual attention at fixation and away from fixation. Vision Research, 33, 1.113-1.117.
  • Sampedro, M.J. (1997). El efecto de la homogeneidad-heterogeneidad en la búsqueda simultánea de estímulos definidos por color. Psicothema, 9, 347-358.
  • Sampedro, M.J., Rechea, C. y Ponte, D. (1998). Claves de profundidad como elemento desencadenante de la detección automática de estímulos definidos por conjunciones de color x localización espacial. En J. Botella y V. Ponsoda (Eds.), La atención: un enfoque pluridisciplinar, Vol 1 (capítulo 18, pp. 223-236). Valencia: Promolibro.
  • Scialfa, C.T. y Joffe, K.M. (1998). Response times and eye movements in feature and conjunction search as a function of target eccentricity. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 1.067-1.082.
  • Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The 14th Bartlett Memorial Lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237.
  • Treisman, A. y Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
  • Treisman, A. y Sato, S. (1990). Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 459-478.
  • Verghese, P. y Nakayama, K. (1994). Stimulus discriminability in visual search. Vision Research, 34, 2.453-2.467.
  • Wolfe, J.M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1, 202-238.
  • Wolfe, J.M., Cave, K.R. y Franzel, S.L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419- 433.
  • Wolfe, J.M., O’Neill, P. y Bennett, S (1998). Why are there eccentricity effects in visual search? Visual and attentional hypothesis. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 140-156.
  • Wolfe, J.M., Steward, M.I., Friedman-Hill, S.R., Yu, K.P., Shorter, A.D. y Cave, K.R. (1990). Limitations on the parallel guidance of visual search: Color x color and orientation x orientation conjunctions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 879-892.
  • Yund, E.W. y Efron, R. (1996). Guided search: The effects of learning. Brain and Cognition, 31, 369-386.
  • Yund, E.W., Efron, R. y Nichols, D.R. (1990). Detectability gradients as a function of target location. Brain and Cognition, 12, 1-16.