Análisis comparativo de dos métodos de evaluación de las publicaciones científicas

Abstract

Background: Assessing the quality of scientific production is a challenge for both institutions and funding agencies. The Objective Quality of a scientific publication refers to its intrinsic value in relation to internationally accepted benchmarks. Scientific Management refers to an added value given to a publication which is established by the manager and modifies its objective quality. Methods: We have developed own method of objective assessment of a CIBERobn groups. This method in evaluating the component groups of CIBERobn. Applying Spearman´s correlation, arecomparing them with the method used byISCIII. Results: Arguably, there is a high correlation between the scores obtained with both methods for the 25 groups using Objective Quality criteria (> 0.80). To apply Objective Quality criteria modulated by Scientific Management does not reach 0.50. Conclusion: We can say that after analysis, CIBERobn method that more information is used both as Objective Quality and Scientific Management, away from the funding criteria as subject to controversy and different trends.