Sistemas de medición de gases de efecto invernadero en explotaciones lácteas: revisión bibliográfica

  1. Álvarez, J. 1
  2. Yáñez, U. 1
  3. Becerra, J.J. 1
  4. Peña, A.I. 1
  5. Herradón, P.G. 1
  6. Quintela,L.A. 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info
    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

    Localización xeográfica da organización Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
Revista:
Archivos de zootecnia

ISSN: 0004-0592,  1885-4494

Ano de publicación: 2025

Volume: 74

Número: 286

Páxinas: 171-181

Tipo: Artigo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDialnet editor

Outras publicacións en: Archivos de zootecnia

Resumo

It is estimated that, due to climate change, the Earth’s average global temperature will increase between 1 and 5.7 ºC by the end of the 21st century. The primary sector is directly responsible for 20% of anthropogenic greenhouse gases. The main objective of this literature review is to gather the most up-to-date information possible on the different methods of measuring greenhouse gases, in order to find the most useful one(s) for continuous and simple analysis in dairy cattle farms. We can classify the measurement methods depending on how they measure greenhouse gases into: direct systems, indirect systems, and semi-indirect systems. The choice of measurement method will depend on the farm to be studied, the necessary equipment, knowledge, economic investment, and the time available to the farm operator. The development of a continuous measurement tool applicable to a large number of animals is necessary in order to compare emissions among different farming systems.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Alfonzo, EPM et al. 2016, ‘Relationship between physical attributes and heat stress in dairy cattle from different genetic groups’, International Journal of Biometeorology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 245–253.
  • Bačėninaitė, D, Džermeikaitė, K, & Antanaitis, R 2022, ‘Global Warming and Dairy Cattle: How to Control and Reduce Methane Emission’, Animals, vol. 12, no. 19, p. 2687.
  • Bekele, W et al. 2022, ‘Contemporary Methods of Measuring and Estimating Methane Emission from Ruminants’, Methane, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 82–95.
  • Bittante, G & Cipolat-Gotet, C 2018, ‘Direct and indirect predictions of enteric methane daily production, yield, and intensity per unit of milk and cheese, from fatty acids and milk Fourier-transform infrared spectra’, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 101, no. 8, pp. 7219–7235.
  • Chilliard, Y et al. 2009, ‘Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output1’, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 92, no. 10, pp. 5199–5211.
  • Damián, JP et al. 2022, ‘Do device that simulate methane capture equipment, as a mask located in the head of dairy cows affect their welfare?’, Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, vol. 84, no. 11, pp. 1461–1464.
  • Deighton, MH et al. 2014, ‘A modified sulphur hexafluoride tracer technique enables accurate determination of enteric methane emissions from ruminants’, Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 197, pp. 47–63.
  • Della Rosa, MM, Jonker, A, & Waghorn, GC 2021, ‘A review of technical variations and protocols used to measure methane emissions from ruminants using respiration chambers, SF6 tracer technique and GreenFeed, to facilitate global integration of published data’, Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 279, p. 115018.
  • Dijkstra, J et al. 2011, ‘Relationships between methane production and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cattle’, Animal Feed Science and Technology, vol. 166–167, pp. 590–595.
  • Engelke, SW et al. 2019, ‘Methane prediction based on individual or groups of milk fatty acids for dairy cows fed rations with or without linseed’, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 1788–1802.
  • Fernández, C et al. 2021, ‘Changes in nutrient balance, methane emissions, physiologic biomarkers, and production performance in goats fed different forage-to-concentrate ratios during lactation’, Journal of Animal Science, vol. 99, no. 7, p. skab114.
  • Galyean, ML & Hales, KE 2022, ‘Prediction of methane per unit of dry matter intake in growing and finishing cattle from the ratio of dietary concentrations of starch to neutral detergent fiber alone or in combination with dietary concentration of ether extract’, Journal of Animal Science, vol. 100, no. 9, p. skac243.
  • Garnsworthy, PC et al. 2012, ‘On-farm methane measurements during milking correlate with total methane production by individual dairy cows’, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 3166–3180.
  • Government of Canada 2021, ‘Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act’.
  • Grassauer, F, Arulnathan, V, & Pelletier, N 2023, ‘Towards a net-zero greenhouse gas emission egg industry: A review of relevant mitigation technologies and strategies, current emission reduction potential, and future research needs’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 181, no. C, viewed 12 June 2024, https://ideas.repec.org//a/eee/rensus/v181y2023ics1364032123001788.html
  • Guadagnin, AR et al. 2023, ‘Assessment of heat production and methane emission using infrared thermography in lactating Holstein and Gyrolando-F1 (½ Holstein ½ Gyr) crossbreed cows’, Journal of Thermal Biology, vol. 115, p. 103628.
  • Hales, KE et al. 2022, ‘Predicting metabolizable energy from digestible energy for growing and finishing beef cattle and relationships to the prediction of methane’, Journal of Animal Science, vol. 100, no. 3, p.skac013.
  • Hammond, KJ, Waghorn, GC, & Hegarty, RS 2016, ‘The GreenFeed system for measurement of enteric methane emission from cattle’, Animal Production Science, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 181–189.
  • Holtkamp, F, Clemens, J, & Trimborn, M 2023, ‘Calcium cyanamide reduces methane and other trace gases during long-term storage of dairy cattle and fattening pig slurry’, Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), vol. 161, pp. 61–71.
  • Hristov, AN et al. 2015, ‘The Use of an Automated System (GreenFeed) to Monitor Enteric Methane and Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Ruminant Animals’, Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, , no. 103, p. 52904.
  • Huang, M-Q et al. 2022, ‘A novel Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain performs simultaneous heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification and aerobic phosphate removal’, Water Research, vol. 221, p. 118823.
  • Huhtanen, P et al. 2015, ‘Comparison of methods to determine methane emissions from dairy cows in farm conditions’, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 3394–3409.
  • IPCC 2019,‘Chapter 10 Emissions from Livestock and Manure Managements’, in, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Islam, MZ et al. 2023, ‘Exhaled volatile fatty acids, ruminal methane emission, and their diurnal patterns in lactating dairy cows’, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 106, no. 10, pp. 6849–6859.
  • Jebari, A et al. 2023, ‘Climate change effects on northern Spanish grassland-based dairy livestock systems’, Plant and Soil, viewed 12 June 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05936-5
  • Jones, MW et al. 2023, ‘National contributions to climate change due to historical emissions of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide since 1850’, Scientific Data, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 155.
  • Kebreab, E et al. 2006, ‘Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from Canadian animal agriculture: A review’, Canadian Journal of Animal Science, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 135–157.
  • Kebreab, E et al. 2010, ‘Impact of dietary manipulation on nutrient flows and greenhouse gas emissions in cattle’, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, vol. 39, pp. 458–464.
  • Kobayashi, N et al. 2021, ‘Laser methane detector-based quantification of methane emissions from indoor-fed Fogera dairy cows’, Animal Bioscience, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1415–1424.
  • Kroeze, C, Mosier, A, & Bouwman, L 1999, ‘Closing the global N2O budget: A retrospective analysis 1500–1994’, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–8.
  • Kwaśny, M & Bombalska, A 2023, ‘Optical Methods of Methane Detection’, Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 23, no. 5, p. 2834.
  • Lan, XKW, Thoning, EJ, & Dlugokencky 2023, Trends in globally-averaged CH4, N2O, and SF6, https://doi.org/10.15138/P8XG-AA10
  • Lockyer, DR & Jarvis, SC 1995, ‘The measurement of methane losses from grazing animals’, Environmental Pollution (Barking, Essex: 1987), vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 383–390
  • López-Paredes, J et al. 2020, ‘Mitigation of greenhouse gases in dairy cattle via genetic selection: 1. Genetic parameters of direct methane using noninvasive methods and proxies of methane’, Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 7199–7209.
  • Madsen, J et al. 2010, ‘Methane and carbon dioxide ratio in excreted air for quantification of the methane production from ruminants’, Livestock Science - LIVEST SCI, vol. 129, pp. 223–227.
  • McCann, L et al. 2015, ‘Effects of observability and complexity on farmers’ adoption of environmental practices’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1346–1362.
  • Metges, CC et al. 2020, ‘PREDICTION METHOD FOR METHANE (CH4) EMISSION OF A DAIRY COW’, , p. 19.
  • Mohamad Salleh, S et al. 2023, ‘Is it Possible to Predict the Methane Intensity of Dairy Cows Using Milk Mid-Infrared Spectroscopy Data?’, viewed 13 June 2024, https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4441019
  • Montanholi, YR et al. 2008, ‘Application of infrared thermography as an indicator of heat and methane production and its use in the study of skin temperature in response to physiological events in dairy cattle (Bos taurus)’, Journal of Thermal Biology, vol. 8, no. 33, pp. 468–475
  • Moraes, LE et al. 2014, ‘Prediction of enteric methane emissions from cattle’, Global Change Biology, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2140–2148.
  • Oikawa, K et al. 2023, ‘Prediction of methane emissions from fattening cattle using the methane-to-carbon dioxide ratio’, Animal Science Journal = Nihon Chikusan Gakkaiho, vol. 94, no. 1, p. e13828.
  • Patra, AK 2016, ‘Recent Advances in Measurement and Dietary Mitigation of Enteric Methane Emissions in Ruminants’, Frontiers in Veterinary Science, vol. 3, p. 39.
  • Peltokangas, K et al. 2023, ‘Ligneous amendments increase soil organic carbon content in fine-textured boreal soils and modulate N2O emissions’, PloS One, vol. 18, no. 8, p. e0284092.
  • Pereira, AM et al. 2023, ‘A Longitudinal Study with a Laser Methane Detector (LMD) Highlighting Lactation Cycle-Related Differences in Methane Emissions from Dairy Cows’, Animals: an open access journal from MDPI, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 974.
  • Pitesky, ME, Stackhouse, KR, & Mitloehner, FM 2009, ‘Clearing the Air’, , vol. 103, pp. 1–40.
  • Rafalska, A et al. 2023, ‘Variation in methane uptake by grassland soils in the context of climate change - A review of effects and mechanisms’, The Science of the Total Environment, vol. 871, p. 162127.
  • Rey, J et al. 2019, ‘Comparison Between Non-Invasive Methane Measurement Techniques in Cattle’, Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 563.
  • Ribeiro, DM et al. 2023, ‘Goat mammary gland metabolism: An integrated Omics analysis to unravel seasonal weight loss tolerance’, Journal of Proteomics, vol. 289, p. 105009.
  • Sorg, D 2022, ‘Measuring Livestock CH4 Emissions with the Laser Methane Detector: A Review’, Methane, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 38–57.
  • Storm, IMLD et al. 2012, ‘Methods for Measuring and Estimating Methane Emission from Ruminants’, Animals : an Open Access Journal from MDPI, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 160–183.
  • Tedeschi, LO et al. 2022, ‘Quantification of methane emitted by ruminants: a review of methods’, Journal of Animal Science, vol. 100, no. 7, p. skac197.
  • Uddin, J, McNeill, DM, & Phillips, CJC 2023, ‘Infrared thermography as a tool for the measurement of negative emotions in dairy cows’, International Journal of Biometeorology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 219–231
Fonte de datos: Dialnet