¿Para qué usan Internet los adolescentes?

  1. Dans Álvarez-de-Sotomayor, Isabel 1
  2. Muñoz Carril, Pablo César 2
  3. González Sanmamed, Mercedes 3
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

  2. 2 Universidadede Santiago de Compostela(España)
  3. 3 UniversidadedaCoruña (España)
Show affiliations +
Journal:
Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

ISSN: 2529-9638

Year of publication: 2022

Issue: 12

Pages: 127-140

Type: Article

DOI: 10.6018/RIITE.516131 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openDIGITUM editor

More publications in: Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa

Abstract

The use of the Internet by youth has become a matter of debate in various fields of knowledge, gaining special relevance in the educational context, especially for the social emergency caused by COVID-19. The objective of this research has been to analyze the use of the Internet by adolescents in the fourth year of secondary education, distinguishing between leisure-oriented employment and use in school tasks. A non-experimental ex post facto quantitative methodology is used through a questionnaire (N = 1144). The results show that adolescents make a more intensive use of the Internet for the development of leisure activities compared to school tasks, highlighting the use of social networks. Regarding leisure, differences have been found based on academic performance, and in the development of school tasks according to sex. Finally, the need to design specific training actions, both from school and from the family, is discussed that contribute to a more informed and appropriate use of the Internet that allows taking advantage of the possibilities offered by the Internet for learning and integral development of youth in the digital age.

Bibliographic References

  • Baltasar, B. (2018). El linchamiento digital: Acoso, difamación y censura en las redes sociales. Jotdown.
  • Ballesteros, J. y Picazo, L. (2018). Las TIC y su influencia en la socialización de adolescentes. Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud, Fad.
  • Castañeda, L. (2021). Trazabilidad de los discursos sobre tecnología educativa: los caminos de la influencia. Revista Interuniversitaria de Investigación en Tecnología Educativa, 10, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.6018/riite.480011
  • Deloitte (2019). The Deloitte Global Millennial Survey 2019. About-Deloitte/deloitte-2019-millennial-survey.pdf
  • Eco, U. (1964). Apocalittici e integrati. Bompiani.
  • Fernández, A.A. y Shaw, G.P. (2020). Academic Leadership in a Time of Crisis: The Coronavirus and COVID-19. Journal of Leadership Studies, 14 (1), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jls.21684
  • Fernández, C. y García, F., (2016). The use of mobile phones as tools for access and knowledge exchange by students in Spain when studying. Prisma Social, (1), 190-208.
  • Finney, S.J., y DiStefano, C. (2006). Non-normal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G.R. Hancock, & R.O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 269-314). Information Age Publishing. https://bit.ly/2YB0YsZ
  • García-Martín, S., y Cantón-Mayo, I. (2019). Uso de tecnologías y rendimiento académico en estudiantes adolescentes. Comunicar, 59, 73-81. https://doi.org/10.3916/C59-2019-07
  • Garrido, M., Busquet, J. y Munté, R. A. (2016). De las TIC a las TRIC. Estudio sobre el uso de las TIC y la brecha digital entre adultos y adolescentes en España. Anàlisi. Quaderns de Comunicació i Cultura, (54), 44-57. https://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i54.2953
  • Gremmen, M. C., Berger, C., Ryan, A. M., Steglich, C. E. G., Veenstra, R. & Dijkstra, J. K. (2019). Adolescents’ friendships, academic achievement, and risk behaviors: Same-behavior and cross- behavior selection and influence processes. Child Development, 90(2), e192-e211. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13045
  • González Sanmamed, M., Muñoz Carril, P.C. y Dans Álvarez de Sotomayor, I. (2017). Factors which motivate the use of social networks by students. Psicothema, 29(2), 204-210. https://www.doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2016.127
  • Hernández-Sellés, N., Muñoz-Carril, P.C. y González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers & Education, 138, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012
  • ITU y UNESCO (2018). Bridging the gender gap in internet and broadband access and use. Broadband Commission for Digital Development. Working Group on the Digital Gender Divide. https://broadbandcommission.org/workinggroups/Pages/digital-gender-divide.aspx
  • ITU y UNESCO (2019). Child Online Safety: Minimizing the Risk of Violence, Abuse and Exploitation Online. https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Cybersecurity/Pages/Publications.aspx
  • Jenkins, H., Ito, M. & Boyd, D. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era. A conversation on youth, learning, commerce and politics. Polity Press.
  • Jiménez, E., Garmendia. M. y Casado, M. (2018). Entre selfies y whatsapps: Oportunidades y riesgos para la infancia y la adolescencia conectada. Gedisa.
  • Juez, B. (2018). Inteligencia artificial. Promesas y amenazas. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265211_spa
  • McMillan, J. y Schumacher, S (2005). Investigación Educativa. Pearson Addison Wesley.
  • Miguélez-Juan, B., Núñez, P. y Mañas-Viniegra, L. (2019). La Realidad Virtual Inmersiva como herramienta educativa para la transformación social: Un estudio exploratorio sobre la percepción de los estudiantes en Educación Secundaria Postobligatoria. Aula abierta, 48(2), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.17811/rifie.48.2.2019.157-166
  • Morozov, E. (2012). El desengaño de internet. Destino.
  • Muñoz, P.C., Dans, I. y González, M. (2019). Social Networks and Their Uses in The Field Of Secondary Education. En N. Dey, S. Borah, R. Babo y A. Ashour (eds.). Social Network Analytics. Computational Research Methods and Techniques (pp. 203-226). London: Academic Press. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815458-8.00011-6
  • Muñoz-Carril, P.C., Hernández-Sellés, N. y González-Sanmamed, M. (2021). Factors influencing students’ perceived impact of learning and satisfaction in Computer Supported Collaborative Learning. Computers & Education, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104310
  • OECD (2020). PISA 2018 Results (Volume V): Effective Policies, Successful Schools. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/ca768d40-en
  • Pérez Torres, V., Pastor Ruiz, Y. y Abarrou Ben Boubaker, S. (2018). Los youtubers y la construcción de la identidad adolescente. Comunicar, 55, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-06
  • Rodríguez, E. y Ballesteros, J.C. (2019). Jóvenes, ocio y TIC. Una mirada a la estructura vital de la juventud desde los referentes del tiempo libre y las tecnologías. Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud, Fad. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3537638
  • Rubio, R. y Álvaro, A. (2015). Jóvenes y generación 2020. Revista de Estudios de Juventud, 1-226.
  • Sanmartín, A. y Megías, I. (2020). Jóvenes, futuro y expectativa tecnológica. Centro Reina Sofía sobre Adolescencia y Juventud, Fad. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3629108
Data source: Dialnet