Periodismo de alta tecnologíasigno de los tiempos digitales del tercer milenio

  1. Xosé López-García 1
  2. Ángel Vizoso 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1386-6710 1699-2407

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Periodismo hi-tech / Hi-tech Journalism

Volumen: 30

Número: 3

Tipo: Artículo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: El profesional de la información

Resumen

La denominada "alta tecnología" marca buena parte de la innovación y de los debates del periodismo actual. Inteligencia artificial y periodismo caminan de la mano en la fase actual de la digitalización de los procesos. Los estudios sobre el estado de las tecnologías en las redacciones de los medios muestran una clara tendencia de los periodistas a trabajar con herramientas más sofisticadas y a emplearlas en los desafíos que tienen a la hora de realizar su cometido profesional. La tendencia, que no parece tener marcha atrás, introduce renovados debates sobre las amenazas y oportunidades en un ecosistema comunicativo cada vez más complejo y más necesitado de respuestas para establecer modelos sostenibles que aseguren la existencia de información periodística de calidad. En este texto se realiza una aproximación al estado de la cuestión, se analizan experiencias y se sitúan algunos de los retos.

Información de financiación

El texto de este artículo está elaborado en el marco del proyecto Cibermedios nativos digitales en España: forma-tos narrativos y estrategia móvil (RTI2018-093346-B-C33), del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, cofinanciado por el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (Feder).El autor Ángel Vizoso es, además, beneficiario del Programa de Ayudas para la Formación del Profesorado Universitario (FPU), financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades, del Gobierno de España.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, Catherine (2019). “Tinker, tailor, soldier, thief: An investigation into the role of drones in journalism”. Digital journalism, v. 7, n. 5, pp. 658-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1533789
  • Aisch, Gregor (2015). “Seven features you’ll want in your next charting tool”. vis4.net. https://www.vis4.net/blog/2015/03/seven-features-youll-wantin-your-next-charting-tool
  • Bauman, Zigmunt (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN: 978 0 7456 2410 5
  • Beckett, Charlie (2019). New powers, new responsabilities. A global survey of journalism and artificial intelligence. London: London School of Economics. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nf7dquDx6BxsXD3VcF_-J_WzNeoYujN_/view
  • Berganza, Rosa; Lavín, Eva; Piñeiro-Naval, Valeriano (2017). “La percepción de los periodistas españoles acerca de sus roles profesionales”. Comunicar, v. 25, n. 51, pp. 83-92. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-08
  • Biswal, Kumar-Santosh; Gouda, Nikhil-Kumar (2019). “Artificial intelligence in journalism: A boon or bane?”. In: Kulkarni, Anand J.; Chandra Satapathy, Suresh (eds.). Optimization in machine learning and applications. Switzerland: Springer Nature, pp. 155-167. ISBN: 978 981 15 0994 0
  • Boczkowski, Pablo J.; Mitchelstein, Eugenia (2013). The news gap. When the information preferences of the media and the public diverge. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press. ISBN: 978 0 262 52826 9
  • Broussard, Meredith; Diakopoulos, Nicholas; Guzman, Andrea L.; Abebe, Rediet; Dupagne, Michel; Chuan, Ching-Hua (2019). “Artificial intelligence and journalism”. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, v. 96, n. 3, pp. 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019859901
  • Chadwick, Andrew (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 19 069673 3
  • CNN (2016). “CNN launches CNN Air”. CNN, 18 August. https://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2016/08/18/cnn-launches-cnn-air
  • Cooper, Thomas W. (1998). “New technology effects inventory: Forty leading ethical issues”. Journal of mass media ethics, v. 13, n. 2, pp. 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme1302_2
  • DAS Services (2019). What is the difference between automation and robotics?. DAS Services Inc. https://www.dasservicesinc.com/post?post_id=30
  • De-Aguilera, Miguel; Casero-Ripollés, Andreu (2018). “¿Tecnologías para la transformación? Los medios sociales ante el cambio político y social”. Icono 14, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1162
  • De-la-Peña, Nonny; Weil, Peggy; Llobera, Joan; Giannopoulos, Elias; Pomés, Ausiàs; Spanlang, Bernhard; Friedman, Doron; Sánchez-Vives, María V.; Slater, Mel (2010). “Immersive journalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news”. Presence, v. 19, n. 4, pp. 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00005
  • Deuze, Mark (2004). “What is multimedia journalism?”. Journalim studies, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000211131
  • Deuze, Mark (2008). “The changing context of news work: Liquid journalism and monitorial citizenship”. International journal of communication, v. 2, pp. 848-865. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/290/197
  • Deuze, Mark (2017). “Considering a possible future for digital journalism”. Revista mediterránea de comunicación, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 9- 18. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.1.1
  • Deuze, Mark (2019). “What journalism is (not)”. Social media + society, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119857202
  • Diakopoulos, Nicholas (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978 0 674 97698 6
  • Drumwright, Minete (2014). Ethical issues in communication professions. New agenda in communication. Routledge: New York. ISBN: 978 0 415 86994 2
  • Etim, Bassey (2017). “The Times sharply increases articles open for comments, using Google’s technology”. The New York Times, 13 June. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/insider/have-a-comment-leave-a-comment.html
  • Fanta, Alexander (2017). Putting Europe’s robots on the map: Automated journalism in news agencies. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/putting-europes-robots-map-automated-journalism-news-agencies
  • Fernández-Barrero, María-Ángeles (2018). “Periodismo y drones. Retos y oportunidades del uso de drones para la narración informativa en España”. Doxa comunicación, v. 26, pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n26a2
  • Franklin, Bob (2011). The future of journalism. London: Routledge. ISBN: 978 1 138 08570 1
  • Franklin, Bob (2016). “The future of journalism. Risk, threats and opportunities”. Journalism studies, v. 17, n. 7, pp. 798-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1197641
  • Garnham, Nicholas (1996). “Constraints on multimedia convergence”. In: Dutton, William H. (ed.). Information and communication technologies: Visions and realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-119. ISBN: 978 0 19 877459 4
  • Google news lab (2020). Google news initiative. https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/intl/es/google-news-lab
  • Gynnild, Astrid (2014). “Journalism innovation leads to innovation journalism: The impact of computational exploration on changing mindsets”. Journalism, v. 15, n. 6, pp. 713-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913486393
  • Hamilton, James F. (2016). “Hybrid news practices”. In: Witschge, Tamara; Anderson, Chris W.; Domingo, David, Hermida, Alfred (eds.). The SAGE handbook of digital journalism. London: SAGE, pp. 164-178. ISBN: 978 1 47 390653 2
  • Huifeng, He (2015). “End of the road for journalists? Tencent’s Robot reporter ‘Dreamwriter’ churns out perfect 1,000-word news story - in 60 seconds”. South China Morning Post, 11 Sept. https://www.scmp.com/tech/china-tech/article/1857196/end-road-journalists-tencents-robot-reporter-dreamwriter-churns-out
  • Johnston, Chris (2014). “Chernobyl’s eerie desolation revealed by camera mounted on drone”. The guardian, 29 Nov. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/29/chernobyl-desolation-camera-drone
  • Jones, Sarah (2017). “Disrupting the narrative: Inmersive journalism in virtual reality”. Journal of media practice, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2017.1374677
  • Journalism 360 (2016). “Introducing journalism 360: An immersive news initiative”. Medium.com, 15 Sept. https://medium.com/journalism360/introducing-journalism-360-d58b9e72e2e
  • Klinenberg, Eric (2005). “Convergence: News production in a digital age”. The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 597, n. 1, pp. 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204270346
  • Kool, Hollis (2016). “The ethics of immersive journalism: A rhetorical analysis of news storytelling with virtual reality technology”. Intersect, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 1-11. http://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/871/863
  • Kranzberg, Melvin (1991). “Science-technology-society: It’s as simple as XTZ!”. Theory into practice. Science, technology, society: Challenges, v. 25, n. 4, pp. 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543507
  • Lacy, Stephen; Rosenstiel, Tom (2015). Defining and measuring quality journalism. Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University. https://www.issuelab.org/resource/defining-and-measuring-quality-journalism.html
  • Landow, George P. (1997). Hypertext 2.0. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN: 978 0 8018 5585 6
  • López-García, Xosé (2018). “Panorama y desafíos de la mediación comunicativa en el escenario de la automatización inteligente”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 4, pp. 725-731. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.01
  • López-García, Xosé; Rodríguez-Vázquez, Ana-Isabel; Pereira-Fariña, Xosé (2017). “Habilidades tecnológicas y nuevos perfiles profesionales: desafíos actuales para el periodismo”. Comunicar, v. 25, n. 53, pp. 81-90. https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-08
  • Los Angeles Times (2019). “What is the Quakebot and how does it work?”. Los Angeles Times, 24 May. https://www.latimes.com/la-me-quakebot-faq-20190517-story.html
  • Malone, Thomas W. (2018). “How human-computer ‘superminds’ are redefining the future of work”. MIT Sloan management review, v. 59, n. 4, pp. 34-41. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-human-computer-superminds-are-redefining-the-future-of-work
  • Marconi, Francesco (2020). Newsmakers: artificial intelligence and the future of journalism. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN: 978 0 231 19137 1
  • Martin, Nicole (2019). “Did a robot write this? How AI is impacting journalism”. Forbes.com, 8 Febr. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicolemartin1/2019/02/08/did-a-robot-write-this-how-ai-is-impacting-journalism
  • Massey, Brian L.; Levy, Mark R. (1999). “Interactive online journalism at English language web newspapers in Asia”. Gazette, v. 61, n. 6, pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549299061006005
  • Mosseri, Adam (2017). “Working to stop misinformation and false news”. Facebook for media, 7 April. https://www.facebook.com/facebookmedia/blog/working-to-stop-misinformation-and-false-news
  • Mullin, Benjamin (2017). “The Washington Post gets more than a million comments every month, so it’s using AI to tackle them”. Poynter.org, 22 June. https://www.poynter.org/tech-tools/2017/the-washington-post-gets-more-than-a-million-comments-every-month-so-its-using-ai-to-tackle-them-update3
  • Murcia-Verdú, Francisco; Ufarte-Ruiz, María José (2019). “Mapa de riesgos del periodismo hi-tech”. Hipertex.net, n. 18, pp. 47-55. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2019.i18.05
  • Paulussen, Steve (2016). “Innovation in the newsroom”. In: Witschge, Tamara; Anderson, Chris W.; Domingo, David, Hermida, Alfred (eds.). The SAGE handbook of digital journalism. London: SAGE, pp. 192-206. ISBN: 978 1 47 390653 2
  • Pavlik, John (2000). “The impact of technology on journalism”. Journalism studies, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700050028226
  • Pérez-Soler, Susana; Micó-Sanz, Josep-Lluís (2020). “Perfiles profesionales en el periodismo político local en tiempos de redes sociales”. Observatorio (OBS*), v. 14, n. 1, pp. 139-153. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS14120201523
  • Rampazzo-Gambarato, Renira; Tárcia, Lorena-Peret-Teixeira (2016). “Transmedia strategies in journalism. An analytical model for the news coverage of planned events”. Journalism studies, v. 18, n. 11, pp. 1381-1399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2015.1127769
  • Rogers, Simon (2017). “A new machine learning app for reporting on hate in America”. Google - The Kewyord, 18 August. https://www.blog.google/topics/journalism-news/new-machine-learning-app-reporting-hate-america
  • Ryfe, David M. (2012). Can journalism survive: An inside Look at American newsrooms. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN: 978 0 7456 5428 7
  • Salaverría, Ramón (2015). “Los labs como fórmula de innovación en los medios”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 397-404. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.06
  • Scolari, Carlos-Alberto (2009). “Transmedia storytelling: Implicit consumers, narrative worlds, and branding in contemporary media production”. International journal of communication, v. 3, pp. 586-606. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/477
  • Serokell (2020). “Artificial intelligence vs. machine learning vs. deep learning: What’s the difference”. Medium.com. https://medium.com/ai-in-plain-english/artificial-intelligence-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning-whats-the-difference-dccce18efe7f
  • Shepard, Jason M. (2014). “Freedom of the press and journalism ethics in the internet age”. In: Drumwright, Minete (ed.). Ethical issues in communication professions. New agenda in communication. Routledge: New York. ISBN: 978 0 415 86994 2
  • Thurman, Neil (2011). “Making ‘The Daily Me’: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news”. Journalism: Theory, practice & criticism, v. 12, n. 4, pp. 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388228
  • Túñez-López, Miguel; Toural-Bran, Carlos; Valdiviezo-Abad, Cesibel (2019). “Automatización, bots y algoritmos en la redacción de noticias. Impacto y calidad del periodismo artificial”. Revista latina de comunicación social, v. 74, pp. 1411-1433. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2019-1391
  • Urbs Media (2018). “How Radar became front page news”. Medium.com, 10 Sept. https://medium.com/@urbsmedia/how-radar-became-front-page-news-55c2f399f9d6
  • Vállez, Mari; Codina, Lluís (2018). “Periodismo computacional: evolución, casos y herramientas”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 4, pp. 759-768. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.05
  • Van-der-Haak, Bregtje; Parks, Michael; Castells, Manuel (2012). “The future of journalism: Networked journalism”. International journal of communication, v. 6, pp. 2923-2938. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1750
  • VV.AA. (2019). The state of technology in global newsrooms 2019. Washington: International Center for Journalists (ICFJ). https://www.icfj.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/2019%20Final%20Report.pdf
  • Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin; Williams, Andrew; Sambrook, Richard; Harris, Janet; García-Blanco, Iñaki; Dencik, Lina; Cushion, Stephen; Carter, Cynthia; Allan, Stuart (2016). “The future of journalism. Risk, threats and opportunities”. Journalism studies, v. 17, n. 7, pp. 801-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1199486
  • Westcott, Richard (2013). “Hexacopter changes the way TV reporters work”. BBC.com, 29 October. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-24712136
  • Westlund, Oscar (2013). “Mobile news: A review and model of journalism in an age of mobile media”. Digital journalism, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 6-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.740273
  • Wu, Yanfang (2019). “Is automated journalistic writing less biased? An experimental test of auto-written and human-written news stories”. Journalism practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1682940