Periodismo de alta tecnologíasigno de los tiempos digitales del tercer milenio

  1. Xosé López García 1
  2. Ángel Vizoso 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
El profesional de la información

ISSN: 1699-2407

Ano de publicación: 2021

Volume: 30

Número: 3

Páxinas: 1

Tipo: Artigo

DOI: 10.3145/EPI.2021.MAY.01 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso aberto editor

Outras publicacións en: El profesional de la información

Indicadores

Citas recibidas

  • Citas en Scopus: 7 (20-01-2023)
  • Citas en Dialnet Métricas: 8 (26-01-2023)
  • Citas en Web of Science: 4 (02-01-2023)

JCR (Journal Impact Factor)

  • Ano 2021
  • Factor de impacto da revista: 3.596
  • Factor de impacto sen autocitas: 3.277
  • Article influence score: 0.656
  • Cuartil maior: Q2
  • Área: INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Cuartil: Q2 Posición na área: 31/84 (Edición: SSCI)
  • Área: COMMUNICATION Cuartil: Q2 Posición na área: 29/95 (Edición: SSCI)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Ano 2021
  • Impacto SJR da revista: 0.831
  • Cuartil maior: Q1
  • Área: Library and Information Sciences Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 33/249
  • Área: Communication Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 74/458
  • Área: Cultural Studies Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 29/1142
  • Área: Information Systems Cuartil: Q2 Posición na área: 98/352

Índice Dialnet de Revistas

  • Ano 2021
  • Factor de impacto da revista: 2,050
  • Ámbito: DOCUMENTACIÓN Cuartil: C1 Posición no ámbito: 1/25
  • Ámbito: COMUNICACIÓN Cuartil: C1 Posición no ámbito: 3/67

CIRC

  • Ciencias Sociais: A

Scopus CiteScore

  • Ano 2021
  • CiteScore da revista: 4.5
  • Área: Library and Information Sciences Percentil: 86

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Ano 2021
  • JCI da revista: 1.26
  • Cuartil maior: Q1
  • Área: INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 31/164
  • Área: COMMUNICATION Cuartil: Q1 Posición na área: 43/218

Resumo

High technology is driving most of the innovation and debates in journalism today. Artificial intelligence and journalism are walking hand in hand in the current phase, defined by processes of digitization. Studies on the state of the art of such technology in the media reveal a clear tendency towards the use of more sophisticated tools. Furthermore, this research highlights how journalists are increasingly using such approaches in challenging situations. This shift has thus led to more debate on the threats and opportunities of the introduction of such technologies into a communication ecosystem that is already in need of models that can produce high-quality information. This study thus describes the state of the art on the integration of high technology into daily routines in the media.

Información de financiamento

El texto de este art?culo est? elaborado en el marco del proyecto Cibermedios nativos digitales en Espa?a: forma-tos narrativos y estrategia m?vil (RTI2018-093346-B-C33), del Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci?n y Universidades, cofinanciado por el Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (Feder). El autor ?ngel Vizoso es, adem?s, beneficiario del Programa de Ayudas para la Formaci?n del Profesorado Univer-sitario (FPU), financiado por el Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci?n y Universidades, del Gobierno de Espa?a.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams, Catherine (2019). “Tinker, tailor, soldier, thief: An investigation into the role of drones in journalism”. Digital journalism, v. 7, n. 5, pp. 658-677. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.1533789
  • Aisch, Gregor (2015). “Seven features you’ll want in your next charting tool”. vis4.net. https://www.vis4.net/blog/2015/03/seven-features-youll-wantin-your-next-charting-tool
  • Bauman, Zigmunt (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN: 978 0 7456 2410 5
  • Beckett, Charlie (2019). New powers, new responsabilities. A global survey of journalism and artificial intelligence. London: London School of Economics. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nf7dquDx6BxsXD3VcF_-J_WzNeoYujN_/view
  • Berganza, Rosa; Lavín, Eva; Piñeiro-Naval, Valeriano (2017). “La percepción de los periodistas españoles acerca de sus roles profesionales”. Comunicar, v. 25, n. 51, pp. 83-92. https://doi.org/10.3916/C51-2017-08
  • Biswal, Kumar-Santosh; Gouda, Nikhil-Kumar (2019). “Artificial intelligence in journalism: A boon or bane?”. In: Kulkarni, Anand J.; Chandra Satapathy, Suresh (eds.). Optimization in machine learning and applications. Switzerland: Springer Nature, pp. 155-167. ISBN: 978 981 15 0994 0
  • Boczkowski, Pablo J.; Mitchelstein, Eugenia (2013). The news gap. When the information preferences of the media and the public diverge. Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press. ISBN: 978 0 262 52826 9
  • Broussard, Meredith; Diakopoulos, Nicholas; Guzman, Andrea L.; Abebe, Rediet; Dupagne, Michel; Chuan, Ching-Hua (2019). “Artificial intelligence and journalism”. Journalism & mass communication quarterly, v. 96, n. 3, pp. 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699019859901
  • Chadwick, Andrew (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978 0 19 069673 3
  • CNN (2016). “CNN launches CNN Air”. CNN, 18 August. https://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2016/08/18/cnn-launches-cnn-air
  • Cooper, Thomas W. (1998). “New technology effects inventory: Forty leading ethical issues”. Journal of mass media ethics, v. 13, n. 2, pp. 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327728jmme1302_2
  • DAS Services (2019). What is the difference between automation and robotics?. DAS Services Inc. https://www.dasservicesinc.com/post?post_id=30
  • De-Aguilera, Miguel; Casero-Ripollés, Andreu (2018). “¿Tecnologías para la transformación? Los medios sociales ante el cambio político y social”. Icono 14, v. 16, n. 1, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v16i1.1162
  • De-la-Peña, Nonny; Weil, Peggy; Llobera, Joan; Giannopoulos, Elias; Pomés, Ausiàs; Spanlang, Bernhard; Friedman, Doron; Sánchez-Vives, María V.; Slater, Mel (2010). “Immersive journalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news”. Presence, v. 19, n. 4, pp. 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00005
  • Deuze, Mark (2004). “What is multimedia journalism?”. Journalim studies, v. 5, n. 2, pp. 139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670042000211131
  • Deuze, Mark (2008). “The changing context of news work: Liquid journalism and monitorial citizenship”. International journal of communication, v. 2, pp. 848-865. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/290/197
  • Deuze, Mark (2017). “Considering a possible future for digital journalism”. Revista mediterránea de comunicación, v. 8, n. 1, pp. 9- 18. https://doi.org/10.14198/MEDCOM2017.8.1.1
  • Deuze, Mark (2019). “What journalism is (not)”. Social media + society, v. 5, n. 3, pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119857202
  • Diakopoulos, Nicholas (2019). Automating the news: How algorithms are rewriting the media. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978 0 674 97698 6
  • Drumwright, Minete (2014). Ethical issues in communication professions. New agenda in communication. Routledge: New York. ISBN: 978 0 415 86994 2
  • Etim, Bassey (2017). “The Times sharply increases articles open for comments, using Google’s technology”. The New York Times, 13 June. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/06/13/insider/have-a-comment-leave-a-comment.html
  • Fanta, Alexander (2017). Putting Europe’s robots on the map: Automated journalism in news agencies. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/putting-europes-robots-map-automated-journalism-news-agencies
  • Fernández-Barrero, María-Ángeles (2018). “Periodismo y drones. Retos y oportunidades del uso de drones para la narración informativa en España”. Doxa comunicación, v. 26, pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.31921/doxacom.n26a2
  • Franklin, Bob (2011). The future of journalism. London: Routledge. ISBN: 978 1 138 08570 1
  • Franklin, Bob (2016). “The future of journalism. Risk, threats and opportunities”. Journalism studies, v. 17, n. 7, pp. 798-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1197641
  • Garnham, Nicholas (1996). “Constraints on multimedia convergence”. In: Dutton, William H. (ed.). Information and communication technologies: Visions and realities. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 103-119. ISBN: 978 0 19 877459 4
  • Google news lab (2020). Google news initiative. https://newsinitiative.withgoogle.com/intl/es/google-news-lab
  • Gynnild, Astrid (2014). “Journalism innovation leads to innovation journalism: The impact of computational exploration on changing mindsets”. Journalism, v. 15, n. 6, pp. 713-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913486393
  • Hamilton, James F. (2016). “Hybrid news practices”. In: Witschge, Tamara; Anderson, Chris W.; Domingo, David, Hermida, Alfred (eds.). The SAGE handbook of digital journalism. London: SAGE, pp. 164-178. ISBN: 978 1 47 390653 2
  • Huifeng, He (2015). “End of the road for journalists? Tencent’s Robot reporter ‘Dreamwriter’ churns out perfect 1,000-word news story - in 60 seconds”. South China Morning Post, 11 Sept. https://www.scmp.com/tech/china-tech/article/1857196/end-road-journalists-tencents-robot-reporter-dreamwriter-churns-out
  • Johnston, Chris (2014). “Chernobyl’s eerie desolation revealed by camera mounted on drone”. The guardian, 29 Nov. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/nov/29/chernobyl-desolation-camera-drone
  • Jones, Sarah (2017). “Disrupting the narrative: Inmersive journalism in virtual reality”. Journal of media practice, v. 18, n. 1, pp. 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/14682753.2017.1374677
  • Journalism 360 (2016). “Introducing journalism 360: An immersive news initiative”. Medium.com, 15 Sept. https://medium.com/journalism360/introducing-journalism-360-d58b9e72e2e
  • Klinenberg, Eric (2005). “Convergence: News production in a digital age”. The annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, v. 597, n. 1, pp. 48-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204270346
  • Kool, Hollis (2016). “The ethics of immersive journalism: A rhetorical analysis of news storytelling with virtual reality technology”. Intersect, v. 9, n. 3, pp. 1-11. http://ojs.stanford.edu/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/871/863
  • Kranzberg, Melvin (1991). “Science-technology-society: It’s as simple as XTZ!”. Theory into practice. Science, technology, society: Challenges, v. 25, n. 4, pp. 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849109543507
  • Lacy, Stephen; Rosenstiel, Tom (2015). Defining and measuring quality journalism. Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University. https://www.issuelab.org/resource/defining-and-measuring-quality-journalism.html
  • Landow, George P. (1997). Hypertext 2.0. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN: 978 0 8018 5585 6
  • López-García, Xosé (2018). “Panorama y desafíos de la mediación comunicativa en el escenario de la automatización inteligente”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 4, pp. 725-731. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.01
  • López-García, Xosé; Rodríguez-Vázquez, Ana-Isabel; Pereira-Fariña, Xosé (2017). “Habilidades tecnológicas y nuevos perfiles profesionales: desafíos actuales para el periodismo”. Comunicar, v. 25, n. 53, pp. 81-90. https://doi.org/10.3916/C53-2017-08
  • Los Angeles Times (2019). “What is the Quakebot and how does it work?”. Los Angeles Times, 24 May. https://www.latimes.com/la-me-quakebot-faq-20190517-story.html
  • Malone, Thomas W. (2018). “How human-computer ‘superminds’ are redefining the future of work”. MIT Sloan management review, v. 59, n. 4, pp. 34-41. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-human-computer-superminds-are-redefining-the-future-of-work
  • Marconi, Francesco (2020). Newsmakers: artificial intelligence and the future of journalism. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN: 978 0 231 19137 1
  • Martin, Nicole (2019). “Did a robot write this? How AI is impacting journalism”. Forbes.com, 8 Febr. https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicolemartin1/2019/02/08/did-a-robot-write-this-how-ai-is-impacting-journalism
  • Massey, Brian L.; Levy, Mark R. (1999). “Interactive online journalism at English language web newspapers in Asia”. Gazette, v. 61, n. 6, pp. 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016549299061006005
  • Mosseri, Adam (2017). “Working to stop misinformation and false news”. Facebook for media, 7 April. https://www.facebook.com/facebookmedia/blog/working-to-stop-misinformation-and-false-news
  • Mullin, Benjamin (2017). “The Washington Post gets more than a million comments every month, so it’s using AI to tackle them”. Poynter.org, 22 June. https://www.poynter.org/tech-tools/2017/the-washington-post-gets-more-than-a-million-comments-every-month-so-its-using-ai-to-tackle-them-update3
  • Murcia-Verdú, Francisco; Ufarte-Ruiz, María José (2019). “Mapa de riesgos del periodismo hi-tech”. Hipertex.net, n. 18, pp. 47-55. https://doi.org/10.31009/hipertext.net.2019.i18.05
  • Paulussen, Steve (2016). “Innovation in the newsroom”. In: Witschge, Tamara; Anderson, Chris W.; Domingo, David, Hermida, Alfred (eds.). The SAGE handbook of digital journalism. London: SAGE, pp. 192-206. ISBN: 978 1 47 390653 2
  • Pavlik, John (2000). “The impact of technology on journalism”. Journalism studies, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 229-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700050028226
  • Pérez-Soler, Susana; Micó-Sanz, Josep-Lluís (2020). “Perfiles profesionales en el periodismo político local en tiempos de redes sociales”. Observatorio (OBS*), v. 14, n. 1, pp. 139-153. https://doi.org/10.15847/obsOBS14120201523
  • Rampazzo-Gambarato, Renira; Tárcia, Lorena-Peret-Teixeira (2016). “Transmedia strategies in journalism. An analytical model for the news coverage of planned events”. Journalism studies, v. 18, n. 11, pp. 1381-1399. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670x.2015.1127769
  • Rogers, Simon (2017). “A new machine learning app for reporting on hate in America”. Google - The Kewyord, 18 August. https://www.blog.google/topics/journalism-news/new-machine-learning-app-reporting-hate-america
  • Ryfe, David M. (2012). Can journalism survive: An inside Look at American newsrooms. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN: 978 0 7456 5428 7
  • Salaverría, Ramón (2015). “Los labs como fórmula de innovación en los medios”. El profesional de la información, v. 24, n. 4, pp. 397-404. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2015.jul.06
  • Scolari, Carlos-Alberto (2009). “Transmedia storytelling: Implicit consumers, narrative worlds, and branding in contemporary media production”. International journal of communication, v. 3, pp. 586-606. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/477
  • Serokell (2020). “Artificial intelligence vs. machine learning vs. deep learning: What’s the difference”. Medium.com. https://medium.com/ai-in-plain-english/artificial-intelligence-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning-whats-the-difference-dccce18efe7f
  • Shepard, Jason M. (2014). “Freedom of the press and journalism ethics in the internet age”. In: Drumwright, Minete (ed.). Ethical issues in communication professions. New agenda in communication. Routledge: New York. ISBN: 978 0 415 86994 2
  • Thurman, Neil (2011). “Making ‘The Daily Me’: Technology, economics and habit in the mainstream assimilation of personalized news”. Journalism: Theory, practice & criticism, v. 12, n. 4, pp. 395-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884910388228
  • Túñez-López, Miguel; Toural-Bran, Carlos; Valdiviezo-Abad, Cesibel (2019). “Automatización, bots y algoritmos en la redacción de noticias. Impacto y calidad del periodismo artificial”. Revista latina de comunicación social, v. 74, pp. 1411-1433. https://doi.org/10.4185/rlcs-2019-1391
  • Urbs Media (2018). “How Radar became front page news”. Medium.com, 10 Sept. https://medium.com/@urbsmedia/how-radar-became-front-page-news-55c2f399f9d6
  • Vállez, Mari; Codina, Lluís (2018). “Periodismo computacional: evolución, casos y herramientas”. El profesional de la información, v. 27, n. 4, pp. 759-768. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2018.jul.05
  • Van-der-Haak, Bregtje; Parks, Michael; Castells, Manuel (2012). “The future of journalism: Networked journalism”. International journal of communication, v. 6, pp. 2923-2938. http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1750
  • VV.AA. (2019). The state of technology in global newsrooms 2019. Washington: International Center for Journalists (ICFJ). https://www.icfj.org/sites/default/files/2019-10/2019%20Final%20Report.pdf
  • Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin; Williams, Andrew; Sambrook, Richard; Harris, Janet; García-Blanco, Iñaki; Dencik, Lina; Cushion, Stephen; Carter, Cynthia; Allan, Stuart (2016). “The future of journalism. Risk, threats and opportunities”. Journalism studies, v. 17, n. 7, pp. 801-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2016.1199486
  • Westcott, Richard (2013). “Hexacopter changes the way TV reporters work”. BBC.com, 29 October. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-24712136
  • Westlund, Oscar (2013). “Mobile news: A review and model of journalism in an age of mobile media”. Digital journalism, v. 1, n. 1, pp. 6-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2012.740273
  • Wu, Yanfang (2019). “Is automated journalistic writing less biased? An experimental test of auto-written and human-written news stories”. Journalism practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1682940