Influence of Pinus pinaster age on aluminium fractions in acidic soils.

  1. Cristina Eimil Fraga 1
  2. Roque Rodríguez Soalleiro 1
  3. María Jose Fernández Sanjurjo 1
  4. Esperanza Álvarez Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España


Spanish Journal of Soil Science: SJSS

ISSN: 2253-6574

Ano de publicación: 2020

Volume: 10

Número: 2

Páxinas: 123-136

Tipo: Artigo


Outras publicacións en: Spanish Journal of Soil Science: SJSS


Citas recibidas

  • Citas en Scopus: 0 (30-08-2023)
  • Citas en Web of Science: 0 (18-09-2023)
  • Citas en Dimensions: 0 (07-04-2023)

SCImago Journal Rank

  • Ano 2020
  • Impacto SJR da revista: 0.316
  • Cuartil maior: Q3
  • Área: Soil Science Cuartil: Q3 Posición na área: 81/156

Scopus CiteScore

  • Ano 2020
  • CiteScore da revista: 1.1
  • Área: Soil Science Percentil: 32

Journal Citation Indicator (JCI)

  • Ano 2020
  • JCI da revista: 0.21
  • Cuartil maior: Q4
  • Área: SOIL SCIENCE Cuartil: Q4 Posición na área: 41/43


(Datos actualizados na data de 07-04-2023)
  • Total de citas: 0
  • Citas recentes: 0
  • Field Citation Ratio (FCR): 0.0


The influence of plantation age on the chemical properties of acidic soils was studied in 16 plots in adult Pinus pinaster stands established in Galicia (NW Spain). The Al fractions in the soil solid phase and the total Al in soil solution were determined in the upper soil layer (0-20 cm) and the lower soil layer (20-40 cm) in each plot. The pH, total C and N, exchangeable Ca, Mg, Na, K, and Al and Al saturation (% Al) were determined in the solid fraction. Aluminium was extracted from the solid phase with the following solutions: ammonium oxalate (Alo), sodium pyrophosphate (Alp), copper chloride (Alcu) and ammonium chloride (AlNH4). The total Al in the liquid phase was also determined. All soil chemical parameters, except total N, C/N ratio and % Al, were significantly influenced by soil depth. The mean pH was lower in the upper than in the lower layer (4.57 vs. 4.97), but the opposite was observed for the organic C (77.2 vs. 50.4 g kg-1), the effective cation exchange capacity (eCEC) (9.43 vs. 6.25 cmol(+) kg-1), P (8.95 vs. 4.65 mg kg-1) and the exchangeable cations. Organic matter, total N and eCEC were significantly and positively correlated with plantation age (r = 0.69 in the upper layer and r = 0.82 in the lower layer, p < 0.01; r = 0.62, p < 0.05 in the upper layer and r = 0.78, p < 0.01 in the lower layer; r = 0.77, p < 0.01 in the upper layer and r = 0.85, p < 0.0001 in the lower layer, respectively), and pHKCl was negatively correlated with plantation age (r = -0.55 in the upper soil layer and r = -0.61 in the lower soil layer, p < 0.05). The concentrations of the different Al forms in all soils decreased in the order Alp > Alo > Alcu > AlNH4. Highly stable organo-aluminium complexes (Alp-cu) predominated over moderate and low stability complexes (Alcu) in all soil plots. The highly stable organo-Al complexes were significantly more abundant in the lower layer, whereas the opposite was observed for the exchangeable Al and the total Al in soil solution. The concentrations of all Al forms (except Alp-cu) were significantly and positively correlated with plantation age (Alo r = 0.50, p < 0.05 for the upper layer and r = 0.67, p < 0.01 for the lower layer; Alp r = 0.64, p < 0.01 for the lower layer; Alcu r = 0.84 for the upper layer and r = 0.83 for the lower layer, p < 0.0001; Alcu-NH4 r = 0.65 for the upper layer and r = 0.78 for the lower layer, p < 0.01; AlNH4 r = 0.76, p < 0.01 for the upper layer and r = 0.84, p < 0.0001 for the lower layer; total Al in soil solution r = 0.61 for the upper layer and r = 0.60 for the lower layer, p < 0.05). Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that plantation age, pH and total C explained between 67% and 93% of the variance in the Al forms. In all regression models, plantation age was a significant predictor variable for the different Al fractions, except total soluble Al, which is an important variable to consider in the study of chemical properties in forest soils.

Información de financiamento

This research was partly funded by a Grant from the Competitive Reference Research Unit Program of the Galician Autonomous Government, cofunded by ERDF (ref. ED431C 2018/07).


Referencias bibliográficas

  • Adams ML, Hawke DJ, Nilsson NHS, Powell KJ. 2000. The relationship between soil solution pH and Al3+ concentrations in a range of South Island (New Zealand) soils. Aust J Soil Res. 38(1):141-154.
  • Álvarez E, Fernández-Marcos M, Monterroso C, Fernández-Sanjurjo M. 2005. Application of aluminium toxicity indices to soils under various forest species. For Ecol Manag. 211:227-239.
  • Álvarez E, Martínez A, Calvo R. 1992. Geochemical aspects of aluminium in forest soils in Galicia (NW Spain). Biogeochemistry 16:167-180.
  • Álvarez E, Monterroso C, Fernández Marcos ML. 2002. Aluminium fractionation in Galicia (NW Spain) forest soils as related to vegetation and parent material. For Ecol Manag. 166:193-206.
  • Álvarez-Gónzalez JG, Ruiz AD, Rodríguez R, Barrio M. 2005. Ecoregional site index models for Pinus pinaster in Galicia (northwestern Spain). Ann For Sci. 62(2):115-127.
  • Bascomb CL. 1968. Distribution of pyrophosphate extractable iron and organic carbon in soils of various groups. J Soil Sci. 19:251-256.
  • Berggren D, Mulder J. 1995. The role of organic matter in controlling aluminum solubility in acidic mineral soil horizons. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59(20):4167-4180.
  • Blakemore LD. 1978. Exchange complex dominated by amorphous material (ECDAM). In: Smith GD, editor. The Andisol Proposal. New Zealand: Soil Bureau, DSIR.
  • Bonneau M. 1995. Fertilisation des forêsts dans les pays tempérés. Nancy: ENGREF. 367 p.
  • Boruvka L, Mladkova L, Drabek O. 2005. Factors controlling spatial distribution of soil acidification and Al forms in forest soils. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 99:1796-1806.
  • Boudot J, Maitat O, Merlet D, Rouiller J. 2000. Soil solutions and surface water analysis in two contrasted watersheds impacted by acid deposition, Vosges mountains, NE France: interpretation in terms of Al impact and nutrient imbalance. Chemosphere 41:1419-1429.
  • Brennan RF, Bolland MDA, Bowden JW. 2004. Potassium deficiency, and molybdenum deficiency and aluminium toxicity due to soil acidification, have become problems for cropping sandy soils in south-western Australia. Aust J Exp Agr. 44:1031-1039.
  • Buol SW, Sánchez PA, Cate RB, Granger MA. 1975. Soil fertility capability classification for fertility management. In: Bornemisza E, Alvarado A, editors. Soil Management in Tropical America. North Carolina State Univ. USA. p. 126-145.
  • Camps Arbestain M, Barreal ME, Mourenza C, Álvarez E, Kidd P, Macías F. 2003. Rhizosphere chemistry in acid forest soils that differ in their degree of Al-saturation of organic matter. Soil Sci. 164:267-279.
  • Camps Arbestain M, Mourenza C, Álvarez E, Macıas F. 2004. Influence of parent material and soil type on the root chemistry of forest species grown on acid soils. For Ecol Manag. 193:307-320.
  • Collignon C, Boudot J, Turpault M. 2012. Time change of aluminium toxicity in the acid bulk soil and the rhizosphere in Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands. Plant and Soil 357:259-274.
  • Cronan CS, Grigal DF. 1995. Use of calcium/aluminum ratios as indicators of stress in forest ecosystems. J Environ Qual. 24:209-226.
  • Dlouhá S, Boruvka L, Pavlú L, Tejnecky V, Drabek O. 2009. Comparison of Al speciation and other soil characteristics between meadow, young forest and old forest stands. Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry 103:1459-1464.
  • Dougan W, Wilson A. 1974. The absorptiometric determination of aluminium in water. A comparison of some chromogenic reagents and the development of an improved method. Analyst 99:413-430.
  • Eimil-Fraga C, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, Sánchez-Rodríguez F, Pérez-Cruzado C, Álvarez- González E. 2014. Significance of bedrock as a site factor determining nutritional status and growth of maritime pine. For Ecol Manag. 331:19-24.
  • Eimil-Fraga C, Álvarez-Rodríguez E, Rodríguez-Soalleiro R, Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ. 2015. Influence of parent material on the aluminium fractions in acidic soils under Pinus pinaster in Galicia (NW Spain). Geoderma 255:50-57.
  • Fernández-Sanjurjo MJ, Álvarez E, Fernández Vega V, García-Rodeja E. 1998. Chemistry of soil solutions under different kinds of vegetation in the vicinity of a thermal power station. Environ Pollut. 101:131-142.
  • Ferro-Vázquez C, Nóvoa-Muñoz JC, Costa-Casais M, Klaminder J, Martínez-Cortizas A. 2014. Metal and organic matter immobilization in temperate podzols: a high resolution study. Geoderma 217-218:225-234.
  • Frankowski M, Ziola-Frankowska A, Siepak J. 2013. From soil to leaves- Aluminum fractionation by single step extraction procedures in polluted and protected areas. J Environ Manag. 127:1-9.
  • García-Rodeja E, Macías F. 1984. Caracterización de suelos ácidos (Podsoles-Andosoles-Suelos alumínicos) de Galicia. In: Proceedings of the I Congreso Nacional de la Ciencia del Suelo. p. 589-602.
  • García-Rodeja E, Nóvoa JC, Pontevedra X, Martínez-Cortizas A, Buurman P. 2007. Aluminium and iron fractionation of European volcanic soils by selective dissolution techniques. In: Arnalds O, Bartoli F, Buurman P, Oskarsson H, Stoops G, García- Rodeja E, editors. Soils of Volcanic Regions in Europe. Springer-Verlag.
  • García-Rodeja E, Silva BM, Macías F. 1987. Andosols developed from non-volcanic materials in Galicia, NW Spain. Journal of Soil Science 38(4):573-591.
  • Guitián F, Carballas MT. 1976. Técnicas de análisis de suelos. Santiago de Compostela: Pico Sacro.
  • Juo AS, Kamprath EJ. 1979. Copper chloride as an extractant for estimating the potentially reactive aluminum pool in acid soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 43:35-38.
  • Kaiser K, Zech W. 1996. Defects in estimation of aluminum in humus complexes of podzolic soils by pyrophosphate extraction. Soil Sci. 161(7):452-458.
  • Kamprath EJ. 1970. Exchangeable aluminium as a criterion for liming leached mineral soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc. 34:252-254.
  • Kononova MM, Belchikova NP. 1970. Use of sodium pyrophosphate to separate and characterize organo-iron and organo-aluminium compounds in soils. Pochvovedeniye 6:61-74.
  • Larssen T, Vogt RD, Seip HM, Furuberg G, Liao B, Xiao J, Xiong J. 1999. Mechanisms for aluminium release in Chinese acid forest soils. Geoderma 91:65-86.
  • Macías F, Calvo de Anta R. 1992. Suelos de la Provincia de La Coruña. Editorial Diputación Provincial.
  • Macías F, Calvo de Anta R, García C, García-Rodeja E, Silva B. 1982. El material original: su formación e influencia en las propiedades de los suelos de Galicia. An Edafol Agrobiol. 41:1747-1768.
  • Macías F, Camps M. 2020. A biogeochemical view of the world reference base soil classification system: Homage to Ward Chesworth. Advances in Agronomy 160:295-342.
  • Marschner B, Winkler R, Jodemann D. 2005. Factors controlling the partitioning of pyrene to dissolved organic matter extracted from different soils. Eur J Soil Sci. 56:299-306.
  • Matús P, Kubova J, Bujdos M, Medved J. 2006. Free aluminium extraction from various reference materials and acid soils with relation to plant availability. Talanta 70:996-1005.
  • Mulder J, Stein A. 1994. The solubility of aluminium in acidic forest soils: long-term changes due to acid deposition. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 58(1):85-94.
  • Mulder J, Van Breemen N, Rasmussen L, Driscoll CT. 1989. Aluminum chemistry of acidic sandy soils with various inputs of acidic deposition in The Netherlands and in Denmark. In: Lewis TE, editor. The Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology of Aluminum. Lewis Publishers. p. 171-194.
  • Olsen SR, Sommers LE. 1982. Phosphorus. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, WI: ASA, SSSA.
  • Peech L, Alexander LT, Dean LA. 1947. Methods of Soil Analysis for Soil Fertility Investigations. UDA Cir. No 757. Washington: US Government Printing Office.
  • Richardson DM. 1998. Ecology and biogeography of Pinus. Cambridge University Press. 527 p.
  • Sas Institute Inc. 2004. SAS STAT® User's Guide. SAS Institute. Inc., Cary, NC.
  • Takahashi T, Fukuoka T, Dahlgren RA. 1995. Aluminum solubility and release rates from soil horizons dominated by aluminum–humus complexes. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 41:119-131.
  • Tejnecký V, Drábek O, Borůvka L, Nikodem A, Kopáč J, Vokurková P, Šebek O. 2010. Seasonal variation of water extractable aluminium forms in acidified forest organic soils under different vegetation cover. Biogeochemistry 101:151-163.
  • Urrutia M, Macías F, Garcíıa-Rodeja E. 1995. Evaluación del CuCl2 y del LaCl3 como extractantes de aluminio en suelos ácidos de Galicia. Nova Acta Cient Compostel. 5:173.
  • Walna B, Spychalski W, Siepak J. 2005. Assessment of potentially reactive pools of aluminium in poor forest soils using two methods of fractionation analysis. J Inorg Biochem. 99:1807-1816.