Modelos input-output rectangulares mediante inversas generalizadas

  1. Pereira López, Xesús 1
  2. Fernández Fernández, Melchor 1
  3. Miranda Torrado, Fernando 1
  4. Carrascal Incera, André 1
  1. 1 Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
    info

    Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

    Santiago de Compostela, España

    ROR https://ror.org/030eybx10

Revista:
Anales de ASEPUMA

ISSN: 2171-892X

Ano de publicación: 2012

Número: 20

Tipo: Artigo

Outras publicacións en: Anales de ASEPUMA

Resumo

In economic studies should prevail the utilization of available data. Despite this, in economic modelling related with supply-use tables this aspect is ignored. In fact, as in this format the number of products exceeds the number of industries, considerable information is lost due to the aggregations in order to get square matrices. However, the rectangular matrices can directly be modelled using generalized inverses. The main aim of this paper is to highlight the fact that it is not obligatory elaborate symmetric input-output tables for modelling. In spite of it, in this paper it is reminded how to construct symmetric matrices through the two traditional hypotheses: product technology and industry technology. Finally, it is shown an empirical application with the goal of highlight different alternatives in this area.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Almon, C. (2000): “Product-to-Product Tables via Product-Technology with no Negative Flows”. Economics Systems Research. Vol. 12, núm. 1, pp. 27–43.
  • Armstrong, A. (1975): “Technology Assumptions in the Construction of United Kingdom Input-Output Tables” in Allen, R.; Gossling, W. F. [ed.]: Estimating and Updating Input-Output Coefficients. Input-Output Publishing Co. London.
  • Baksalary, J.; Baksalary, O.M. (2007): “Particular Formulae for the Moore-Penrose Inverse of a Column Wise Partitioned Matrix”. Linear Algebra and its Applications. Vol. 421, núm. 1, pp. 16–23.
  • Bon, R. (1986): “Comparative Stability Analysis of Demand-Side and Supply side Input-Output Models”. International Journal of Forecasting. Vol. 2, pp. 231–235.
  • Dietzenbacher, E. (1997): “In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: a Reinterpretation as a Price Model”. Journal of Regional Science. Vol. 37, pp. 629–651
  • Ghosh, A. (1958): “Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System”. Economica.Vol. 25, pp. 58–64.
  • Guerra, A. I.; Sancho, F. (2011): “Revisiting the Original Ghosh Model: can it be Made more Plausible?” Economic Systems Research. Vol. 23, núm. 3, pp. 319–328.
  • Guo, J., Lawson, A. M.; Planting, M. A. (2002): From Make-Use to Symmetric I-O Tables: An Assessment of Alternative Technology Assumptions. 14th International Input-Output Conference, Montreal.
  • Konijn, P. (1994): The Make and Use of Commodities by Industries: on the Compilation of Input-Output Data from the National Accounts. Enschede. Faculty of Public Administration and Public Policy, University of Twente.
  • Kop Jansen, P.; Ten Raa, T. (1990): “The Choice of Model in the Construction of Input-Output Coefficients Matrices”. International Economic Review. Vol. 31, pp. 213–227.
  • Kornelis, M.; Koole, B. (2003) “Building Compatible Supply, Use, and Input-Output Tables on the Basis of Integrated Data: An Application to the Agricultural Economy of the Netherlands”. Agricultural Economics Research Institute. Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen.
  • Luppino, M., Gajewski, G., Zohir, S., Khondker, B.; Crowther, D. (2004) Estimating the Impacts of the Jamuna Bridge on Poverty Levels in Bangldesh using SAM and CGE Models: A Comparative Study. EcoMod InputOutput and General Equilibrium: Data, Modeling and Policy Analysis Conference. Bruxelas.
  • Mattey, J. P. y Ten Raa, T. (1997): “Primary Versus Secondary Production Techniques in US Manufacturing”. Review of Income and Wealth. Vol. 43, pp.449–464.
  • Miller, R. (1989): “Stability of Supply Coefficients and Consistency of SupplyDriven and Demand-Driven Input-Output Models: a Comment”. Environment and Planning A. Vol. 21, pp. 1113–1120.
  • Moore, E. H. (1920): “On the Reciprocal of the General Algebraic Matrix (Abstract)”. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society. pp. 394–395.
  • Olsen, A. (2000): General Perfect Aggregation of Industries in Input-Output Models. Economic Modelling. Working Paper Series, núm. 2.
  • Oosterhaven, J. (1988): “On the Plausibility of the Supply-Driven InputOutput Model”. Journal of Regional Science. Vol. 28, pp. 203–217.
  • Oosterhaven, J. (1989): “The Supply-Driven Input-Output Model: A New Interpretation but Still Implausible”. Journal of Regional Science. Vol. 29, pp. 459–465.
  • Oosterhaven, J. (1996): “Leontief versus Ghoshian Price and Quantity Models”. Southern Economic Journal. Vol. 62, núm. 3, pp. 750–759.
  • Penrose, R. (1955): “A Generalized Inverse for Matrices”. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. Vol. 51, pp. 406–413.
  • Pereira, X. (2006): Elaboración e Análise de Modelos Económicos basados no Marco Input-Output. Servizo de Publicacións e Intercambio Científico. Santiago de Compostela.
  • Pereira, X., Carrascal, A.; Fernández, M. (2011): Impacto Económico do Turismo Receptor através de Modelos Origem-Destino: uma Aplicaçao para a Galiza, in Haddad, E.; Ramos, P.; Castro, E. [ed.]: Modelos Operacionais de Economia Regional. pp. 101–121. Principia Editora. Parede, Portugal.
  • Pereira, X., Quiñoá; X, L.; Fernández, M. (2011) “Actualización Global de Tablas Origen-Destino: una Alternativa al Método Euro”. Análise Económica,42. Santiago de Compostela
  • Rainer, N. (1989): “Descriptive Versus Analytical Make-Use Systems: Some Austrian Experiences”, in Miller, R.; Polenske, K.; Rose, A. [ed.]: Frontiers of Input-Output Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Rose, A. Allison, T. (1989): “On the Plausibility of the Supply-Driven InputOutput Model: Empirical Evidence on Joint Stability”. Journal of Regional Science. Vol. 29, pp. 451–458.
  • Rueda Cantuche, J.M. (2011): “Econometric Analysis of European Carbon Dioxide Emissions based on Rectangular Supply-Use Tables”. Economic Systems Research. Vol. 23, núm. 3, pp. 261–280.
  • Schinnar, A. (1978): “The Leontief Dynamic Generalized Inverse”. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. Vol. 92, núm. 4, pp. 641–52.
  • Stahmer, C. (1985): “Transformation Matrices in Input-Output Compilation” in Smyshlyaev, A. [ed.]: Input-Output Modelling. pp. 225–236. New York, Springer.
  • Steenge, A. (1990): “The Commodity Technology Revisited: Theoretical Basis and an Application to Error Location in the Make-Use Framework”. Economic Modelling. Vol. 7, núm. 4, pp. 376–387.
  • Ten Raa, T.; Rueda Cantuche, J.M. (2005): “Análisis de las Producciones Secundarias en la Economía Andaluza”. Revista de Estudios Regionales. Vol. 73, pp. 43–77.
  • Viet, V. (1994): “Practices in Input-Output Table Compilation”. Regional Science and Urban Economics. Vol. 24, pp. 27–54.
  • Young, P. (1986): “The US Input-Output Experience-Present Status and Future Prospects” in Franz, A.; Rainer, N. [ed.]: Problems of Compilation of Input-Output Tables. pp. 121–145. Orac. Viena.
  • Zhao, J. (2002): The Techniques of Compiling the Rectangular UV Input-Output Table under the Hypothesis of Product Technology. 14th International Input-Output Conference. Montreal.